Literature DB >> 26780716

A forty millimetre head significantly improves range of motion compared with a twenty eight millimetre head in total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system.

Kosuke Tsuda1,2, Keiji Haraguchi3,4, Junichiro Koyanagi3,4, Shintaro Takahashi5, Ryo Sugama6, Keiju Fujiwara4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Larger-diameter (≥40 mm) femoral heads decrease the incidence of post-operative dislocation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study was conducted to discover whether larger-diameter femoral heads result in greater range of motion of the hip with the use of a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system.
METHODS: Thirty-nine primary THAs were performed via a posterolateral approach using a CT-based navigation system. The stem was inserted in the femur in line with the original femoral neck anteversion. Considering the range of motion during various daily activities which could occur without impingement, the cup anteversion was decided at 10 ° increments according to the stem anteversion. While the cup inclination was set at 40 ° in order to avoid a high inclination angle to prevent the edge roading between the HXLPE liner and ceramic head. After implantation, trial liners and femoral heads were used with either 28 or 40 mm diameter. Maximal hip flexion, extension, abduction, external rotation in extension at 0° and internal rotation angles in flexion at 90 ° were measured. The differences between the ranges of motion with the 40-mm and 28-mm heads were tested. The results were assessed with paired Student t-tests.
RESULTS: The ranges of motion in flexion, extension, abduction and internal rotation angles improved significantly with the 40-mm heads compared with the 28-mm heads. The ranges of motion of cases where maximal flexion angle was 90° or less were excluded, improved significantly with the 40 mm heads.
CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the larger-diameter 40-mm femoral prosthetic heads result in greater ranges of motion in flexion, extension, abduction and internal rotation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT-based navigation; Femoral head diameter; Range of motion; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26780716     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-3095-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  44 in total

1.  Larger diameter femoral heads used in conjunction with a highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene: a new concept.

Authors:  O K Muratoglu; C R Bragdon; D O'Connor; R S Perinchief; D M Estok; M Jasty; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial?

Authors:  Donald S Garbuz; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Nelson V Greidanus; Eric R Bohm; Martin J Petrak; Craig J Della Valle; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Fixation failures of dual mobility cups: a mid-term study of 2601 hip replacements.

Authors:  Philippe Massin; Vincent Orain; Rémi Philippot; Frederic Farizon; Michel Henry Fessy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Is a cementless dual mobility socket in primary THA a reasonable option?

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; Hervé Arnould; Bertrand Bouxin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation.

Authors:  N Sugano; T Nishii; H Miki; H Yoshikawa; Y Sato; S Tamura
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-04

6.  Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty with large heads may prevent early dislocation.

Authors:  Thomas M Smith; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Roger H Emerson; Thomas H Mallory
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Donald W Howie; Oksana T Holubowycz; Robert Middleton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry.

Authors:  Monti Khatod; Thomas Barber; Elizabeth Paxton; Robert Namba; Donald Fithian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry; Marius von Knoch; Cathy D Schleck; William S Harmsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Anatomic diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Steven A Stuchin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

1.  Current standard rules of combined anteversion prevent prosthetic impingement but ignore osseous contact in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Michael Woerner; Benjamin Craiovan; Florian Voellner; Michael Worlicek; Hans-Robert Springorum; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Personalized Hip Joint Replacement with Large Diameter Head: Current Concepts.

Authors:  Pascal-André Vendittoli; Sagi Martinov; Mina Wahba Morcos; Sivan Sivaloganathan; William G Blakeney
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Head size in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Georgios Tsikandylakis; Maziar Mohaddes; Peter Cnudde; Antti Eskelinen; Johan Kärrholm; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

4.  An accelerometer-based navigation system provides acetabular cup orientation accuracy comparable to that of computed tomography-based navigation during total hip arthroplasty in the supine position.

Authors:  Tomonori Tetsunaga; Kazuki Yamada; Tomoko Tetsunaga; Tomoaki Sanki; Yoshi Kawamura; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Is there a reduction in risk of revision when 36-mm heads instead of 32 mm are used in total hip arthroplasty for patients with proximal femur fractures?

Authors:  Georgios Tsikandylakis; Johan N Kärrholm; Geir Hallan; Ove Furnes; Antti Eskelinen; Keijo Mäkelä; Alma B Pedersen; Søren Overgaard; Maziar Mohaddes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.