Literature DB >> 26767858

Predictive factors of mortality within 30 days in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Yoo Jin Lee1, Bo Ram Min1, Eun Soo Kim1, Kyung Sik Park1, Kwang Bum Cho1, Byoung Kuk Jang1, Woo Jin Chung1, Jae Seok Hwang1, Seong Woo Jeon2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a common medical emergency that can be life threatening. This study evaluated predictive factors of 30-day mortality in patients with this condition.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at a single hospital between April 2010 and November 2012, and 336 patients with symptoms and signs of gastrointestinal bleeding were consecutively enrolled. Clinical characteristics and endoscopic findings were reviewed to identify potential factors associated with 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: Overall, 184 patients were included in the study (men, 79.3%; mean age, 59.81 years), and 16 patients died within 30 days (8.7%). Multivariate analyses revealed that comorbidity of diabetes mellitus (DM) or metastatic malignancy, age ≥ 65 years, and hypotension (systolic pressure < 90 mmHg) during hospitalization were significant predictive factors of 30-day mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity of DM or metastatic malignancy, age ≥ 65 years, and hemodynamic instability during hospitalization were predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with NVUGIB. These results will help guide the management of patients with this condition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comorbidity; Gastrointestinal hemorrhage; Mortality; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26767858      PMCID: PMC4712435          DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2016.31.1.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Intern Med        ISSN: 1226-3303            Impact factor:   2.884


INTRODUCTION

Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is the most common medical emergency, and is a considerable clinical and economic burden [1]. Although the mortality rate in patients with NVUGIB has declined dramatically in recent years due to the development of proton pump inhibitors and endoscopic therapy, it remains high at 5% to 10% [2,3]. A recent international consensus on NVUGIB emphasized the importance of early risk stratification for rebleeding and mortality [4]. Several risk factors for this condition have been proposed, and of these, rebleeding was a significant predictor of mortality [5-7]. Other predictive factors include advanced age, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, advanced neoplasia, low hemoglobin level, cardiac failure, and hemodynamic instability [1,8]. Early recognition of the risk of death would facilitate differentiation between high- and low-risk patients. Close monitoring and careful management of high-risk patients could improve their prognosis. Therefore, predictors of mortality in patients with NVUGIB are clinically valuable. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate potential predictors associated with 30-day mortality in patients admitted to the emergency unit for this condition.

METHODS

Patients

This prospective, single-center, observational study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Daegu, Korea (Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital), and was approved by the institutional review board of the university (No. 11-294). Written informed consent was obtained from all of the subjects enrolled in the study. This study is registered in the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (KCT0000514). Adult patients (> 18 years), clinically diagnosed with gastrointestinal bleeding between April 2010 and November 2012, were enrolled. Patients were excluded if they did not complete at least 30 days of follow-up, if the bleeding source was varices or gastric cancer, if bleeding was associated with endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic mucosal resection, or if bleeding occurred in the lower gastrointestinal tract. The following information was documented prospectively: patient data (age, sex, date of admission, and endoscopy results); historical data (presenting symptoms, previous history of gastrointestinal bleeding, or peptic ulcer disease); social history such as current smoking status, alcohol consumption (heavy alcoholics were defined as women and men who consumed more than 40 and 60 g alcohol per day, respectively, for more than 5 years) [9]; physical findings (results of nasogastric tube aspiration, results of rectal examination, and initial hemodynamic status); initial laboratory data (hemoglobin and blood urea levels, platelet count, and nitrogen prothrombin time); and comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, liver cirrhosis (liver cirrhosis was defined according to clinical, laboratory, and radiologic data but not liver biopsy results because biopsy was not performed) [10], chronic kidney disease (defined as patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min for at least 3 months calculated using the four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation) [11], metastatic malignancy, and peripheral vascular disease. Hemodynamic instability was defined as tachycardia with a heart rate > 100 beats per minute and hypotension with a systolic pressure < 90 mmHg upon admission and during hospitalization. Medication history (antiplatelet agents, vitamin K antagonists, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], steroids, and proton pump inhibitors) was also recorded if patients had taken the aforementioned drugs 1 week before the first bleeding event. Patients were managed according to recent consensus recommendations, including endoscopic and pharmacologic management as well as transfusion [4]. All of the patients were intravenously administered proton pump inhibitors. In addition, each patient’s risk of bleeding was assessed by a Rockall score and a Blatchford score. The total Rockall score includes both endoscopic and nonendoscopic variables, whereas the Blatchford score is only based on nonendoscopic variables [6,7]. High-risk patients were defined as those with a total Rockall score ≥ 5, indicating an estimated mortality rate of 40% [6].

Endoscopic procedures

All of the endoscopic procedures for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) were performed within 24 hours after arrival at the hospital. Procedures were performed by experienced endoscopists who had previously conducted > 1,000 endoscopies. Urgent endoscopy was defined as an endoscopy procedure conducted within 12 hours of admission [4]. High-risk patients underwent urgent endoscopy according to a strict hospital protocol. However, in patients who showed unfavorable clinical conditions for endoscopy or in those who arrived at night or during the weekend, the decision to perform this procedure was made by the individual endoscopist. Endoscopic variables included the cause of UGIB and location of the lesion. Lesions are either located in the body of the stomach, where the risk of bleeding is high due to numerous supplying vessels, or in other parts of the stomach [12]. Unidentified causes of bleeding were defined as the presence of blood in the stomach without any identifiable source of bleeding [3]. In patients with ulcers, bleeding activity at the ulcer base was classified according to the Forrest classification [13]. Forrest I, IIa, and IIb represent high-risk bleeding stigmata (HRBS) [3,6]. Endoscopic findings were reviewed and adjusted by two expert endoscopists (YJL and ESK) to improve interobserver agreement.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was mortality within 30 days of admission. Patients were advised to return for an examination at 4 and 12 weeks after discharge. For discharged or deceased patients, the relevant data from hospital records were extracted by investigators. Patients with hospital record data that did not satisfy the inclusion criteria were excluded. A 30-day rebleeding episode was defined as the onset of new hematemesis or hematochezia with hypovolemic shock, or a greater than 2 g/dL decrease in blood hemoglobin levels after a 24-hour period of stable vital signs within 30 days of admission [3,14]. All of the rebleeding episodes were confirmed with endoscopy. Bleeding-related 30-day mortality included death from irreversible hypovolemic shock during surgery for uncontrolled bleeding or endoscopy-related mortality occurring within 30 days of the index-bleeding episode. Nonbleeding-related 30-day mortality was defined as death from cardiac, pulmonary or cerebrovascular disease, liver or kidney failure, and malignant disease [15].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Student t test was used for comparison of continuous variables. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher exact test or a chi-square test. Independent risk factors for 30-day mortality were assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. An odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for each independent factor. A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

During the study period, 336 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding were admitted, and 184 (54.8%) met the inclusion criteria (Fig. 1). A total of 144 patients were excluded from the study because the source of bleeding was varices (82 patients), the lower gastrointestinal tract (59 patients), or gastric cancer (3 patients). Eight patients were lost to follow-up. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 59.81 years, and 79.3% of patients were male. The most frequently presenting symptom was hematemesis (50.0%). A total of 48 patients (26.1%) had a previous history of gastrointestinal bleeding, and 60 (32.6%) had a previous history of peptic ulcer disease. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (82 patients, 44.6%), followed by DM (44 patients, 23.9%). With regard to concomitant use of drugs that could have been related to bleeding, 53 patients (28.8%) used antiplatelet agents including aspirin, clopidogrel, or cilostazol, and 37 patients (20.1%) used NSAIDs. As outlined in Table 2, the mean serum level of hemoglobin upon admission was 8.97 g/dL. The percentage of patients with tachycardia (heart rate > 100 beats per minute) and hypotension (systolic pressure < 90 mmHg) during hospitalization was 33.7% and 22.8%, respectively. The percentage of patients with positive nasogastric tube aspiration and digital rectal examination was 68.9% (122/177) and 68.7% (123/179), respectively. Packed red blood cells were transfused in 111 patients (60.3%), and the mean number of units transfused was 2.36 ± 3.69. The mean total Rockall score was 4.62 ± 2.00, and 96 patients (52.2%) had a score ≥ 5, indicating a high risk of mortality. The mean Blatchford score was 11.49 ± 3.38.
Figure 1.

Flow chart of patient selection in the study. UGIB, upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Table 1.

General characteristics of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 184)

FactorValue
Male sex146 (79.3)
Age, yr59.81 ± 15.80
Bleeding related symptoms
 Hematemesis92 (50.0)
 Tarry stool77 (41.8)
 Hematochezia12 (6.5)
 Acute onset anemia3 (1.6)
Heavy alcoholics72 (39.1)
Current smoker68 (37.0)
Past history of gastrointestinal bleeding48 (26.1)
Past history of peptic ulcer disease60 (32.6)
Comorbidities
 Hypertension82 (44.6)
 Diabetes mellitus44 (23.9)
 Liver cirrhosis30 (16.3)
 Chronic kidney disease28 (15.2)
 Cerebrovascular disease26 (14.1)
 Heart failure27 (14.7)
 Cardiovascular disease22 (12.0)
 Metastatic malignancy8 (4.3)
 Peripheral vascular disease4 (2.2)
Use of medication
 Antiplatelet agents53 (28.8)
 NSAIDs37 (20.1)
 Vitamin K antagonist8 (4.3)
 PPI co-medication7 (3.8)

Values are presented as number (%) or mean ± SD.

NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; PPI, proton pump inhibitor.

Table 2.

Clinical data at the time of admission to the hospital for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 184)

FactorValue
Initial vital sign
 SBP, mmHg117.58 ± 22.79
 Heart rate, beat/min88.75 ± 17.97
Initial laboratory data
 Hemoglobin, g/dL8.97 ± 2.95
 Platelets, × 109/L253 ± 117
 Blood nitrogen urea, mg/dL42.54 ± 28.53
 Prothrombin time, sec13.29 ± 8.60
Positive nasogastric tube aspiration[a]122/177 (68.9)
Positive rectal examination[b]123/179 (68.7)
Transfusion requirement111 (60.3)
Transfusion requirement, no. of unit2.36 ± 3.69
Tachycardia (heart rate > 100 beat/min) during the hospital stay62 (33.7)
Hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg) during the hospital stay42 (22.8)
Blatchford score11.49 ± 3.38
Rockall score4.62 ± 2.00

Values are presented as mean ± SD or number (%).

SBP, systolic blood pressure.

Nasogastric tube was performed in 177 patients.

Rectal examination was performed in 179 patients.

An urgent endoscopy (< 12 hours after admission) was conducted in 121 patients (65.8%), whereas the remaining patients (63, 34.2%) underwent endoscopy 12 to 24 hours after admission. Peptic ulcer was the main cause of bleeding (78.3%); other causes of bleeding were Mallory-Weiss syndrome (12.5%), angiodysplasia (1.6%), and hemorrhagic gastritis (0.5%). The cause of bleeding in 13 patients (7.1%) could not be identified despite the presence of blood in the stomach. Of the 144 patients with peptic ulcer, 78 (54.2%) showed HRBS (Forrest I, 22.2%; IIa, 20.8%; and IIb, 11.1%) (Table 3).
Table 3.

Endoscopic features of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 184)

FactorNo. (%)
Urgent endoscopy[a]121 (65.8)
Endoscopy finding
 Peptic ulcer disease144 (78.3)
 Mallory-Weiss syndrome23 (12.5)
 Angiodysplasia3 (1.6)
 Hemorrhagic gastritis1 (0.5)
 No evidence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding13 (7.1)
Endoscopy lesion location
 Cardia, angle, antrum89 (48.4)
 Body46 (25.0)
 Duodenum35 (19.0)
 No specific lesion14 (7.6)
Forrest classification[b]
 I32/144 (22.2)
 IIa30/144 (20.8)
 IIb16/144 (11.1)
 IIc40/144 (27.8)
 III26/144 (18.1)

Endoscopy which was performed within 12 hours of admission.

Classified in 144 patients who had ulcers.

Clinical results

The median follow-up period was 196 days (interquartile range, 77 to 404), and the overall number of deaths during this period was 38 (20.7%). The number of deaths within 30 days was 16 (8.7%) (Table 4). Fig. 2 shows the survival curve of patients with NVUGIB over a follow-up period of 30 days. Among patients who died within 30 days, half (8/16, 50.0%) died during the first 7 days; the 7-day survival probability was estimated to be 96.6%. The causes of 30-day mortality are presented in Table 5. Bleeding-related death within 30 days occurred in five patients (31.2%), and all of them died within the first 7 days. The deaths of the remaining 11 patients (68.8%) were associated with their comorbidities. Cardiovascular events including heart failure or acute myocardial infarction were the most frequent nonbleeding-related causes of 30-day mortality (seven patients, 43.8%), followed by liver failure (two patients, 12.5%), brain hemorrhage (one patient, 6.3%), and metastatic cancer progression (one patient, 6.3%). Overall, rebleeding occurred in 38 patients (20.7%) during the follow-up period, and rebleeding within 30 days of admission occurred in 27 patients (14.7%). The median length of hospitalization was 6 days.
Table 4.

Clinical outcomes of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 184)

FactorValue
Rebleeding
 During follow-up period[a]38 (20.7)
 Within 30 days27 (14.7)
Death
 During follow-up period[a]38 (20.7)
 Within 30 days16 (8.7)
Hospital stay, day5.90 ± 5.80

Values are presented as number (%) or mean ± SD.

Median follow-up period of 196 days (interquartile range, 77–404 days).

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier survival curve of 30-day mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Eight patients died during the first 7 days (cumulative survival, 96.6%).

Table 5.

Characteristics of the 16 patients who died within 30 days

PatientAge/SexRockall scoreBlatchford scoreForrest classEndoscopy findingBleeding lesionComorbiditiesDays from admission to deathCause of death
163/M6132AGUAntrumHTN, CKD1Rebleeding
286/M6141BGUUBCKD, HF1Rebleeding
387/M9121BGU & DU2ndHTN, DM, CKD, CVA1Rebleeding
479/F7131BDUBulbHTN, HF1Rebleeding
549/M410-No lesion-HTN, DM, HF, CHB1Liver failure
686/M7132BGUAngleDM2AMI
772/F5133GUAntrumHTN, DM2Brain hemorrhage
869/M1182ADUBulbHTN, CVA, metastatic malignancy6Rebleeding
976/F4142CGUAntrumHTN, DM, CVA, HF10HF
1080/F5122BDU2ndHTN10HF
1163/M57-No lesion-Metastatic malignancy13Cancer progression
1271/M7122AGUMBHTN, DM, CKD, CVA15AMI
1342/M6101BMWSCardiaLC, CKD, metastatic malignancy20Liver failure
1472/M7123GUAntrumHTN, DM, CKD CVD, HF24AMI
1569/M5132CGULBDM, CVA27HF
1669/M6152CGUCardiaHTN, DM, HF, CKD30HF

GU, gastric ulcer; HTN, hypertension; CKD, chronic kidney disease; UB, upper body; HF, heart failure; DU, duodenal ulcer; 2nd, duodenum 2nd portion; DM, diabetes mellitus; CVA, cerebrovascular attack; CHB, chronic hepatitis B; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; MB, mid body; MWS, Mallory-Weiss syndrome; LC, liver cirrhosis; LB, lower body.

Predictive factors for 30-day mortality in patients with NVUGIB

According to univariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years (p = 0.009), DM (p = 0.004), chronic kidney disease (p = 0.004), metastatic malignancy (p = 0.023), heart failure (p = 0.016), Rockall score ≥ 5 (p = 0.003), tachycardia (heart rate > 100 beats per minute) during hospitalization (p < 0.001), hypotension (systolic pressure < 90 mmHg) during hospitalization (p < 0.001), and rebleeding within 30 days (p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for 30-day mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the following variables as independent predictors of increased 30-day mortality in patients with NVUGIB: comorbidity of DM (OR, 12.67; 95% CI, 1.92 to 83.45; p = 0.008) or metastatic malignancy (OR, 29.24; 95% CI, 2.08 to 411.67; p = 0.012), age ≥ 65 years (OR, 5.06; 95% CI, 1.79 to 32.60; p = 0.048), and hypotension (systolic pressure < 90 mmHg) during hospitalization (OR, 16.63; 95% CI, 2.56 to 107.90; p = 0.003) (Table 6). Predictors for 30-day mortality were also analyzed after dividing patients into high- and low-risk bleeding stigmata groups. However, there were no independent risk factors for 30-day mortality according to risk stratification by Forrest classification (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2).
Table 6.

Predictive factors for 30-day mortality (n = 184)

FactorUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
30-Day death (+) (n = 16)30-Day death (–) (n = 168)p valueOdds ratio (95% CI)p value
Male sex14 (87.5)133 (79.2)1.000--
Age ≥ 65 yr11 (68.7)65 (38.7)0.009[a]5.06 (1.79–32.60)0.048[a]
Initial vital signs
 SBP < 90 mmHg013 (7.7)0.608--
 Heart rate > 100 beat/min5 (31.2)43 (25.6)0.567--
Initial laboratory data
 Hemoglobin, g/dL8.60 ± 3.299.0 ± 2.930.581--
 Platelets, × 109/L287 ± 187250 ± 1090.445--
 Blood nitrogen urea, mg/dL58.81 ± 32.3040.99 ± 27.760.071--
 Prothrombin time, sec16.47 ± 10.7513.01 ± 8.360.242--
Severe bleeding related symptoms (hematemesis, hematochezia)9 (56.2)93 (55.4)0.945--
Positive nasogastric tube aspiration[b]12 (75.0)110 (65.5)0.779--
Positive rectal examination[c]14 (87.5)109 (64.9)0.089--
Heavy alcoholics6 (37.5)66 (39.3)0.889--
Current smoker5 (31.2)63 (37.5)0.621--
Past history of gastrointestinal bleeding1 (6.2)47 (28.0)0.074--
Past history of peptic ulcer disease5 (31.2)55 (32.7)0.903--
Transfusion requirement13 (81.2)98 (58.3)0.073--
Red cell transfusion unit4.56 ± 5.622.14 ± 3.390.110--
Comorbidities
 Hypertension11 (68.8)71 (42.3)0.052--
 Diabetes mellitus9 (56.2)35 (20.8)0.004[a]12.67 (1.92–83.45)0.008[a]
 Cardiovascular disease1 (6.2)21 (12.5)0.698--
 Liver cirrhosis1 (6.2)29 (17.3)0.477--
 Chronic kidney disease7 (43.8)21 (12.5)0.004[a]1.18 (0.15–9.59)0.876
 Cerebrovascular disease5 (31.2)21 (12.5)0.055--
 Heart failure6 (37.5)21 (12.5)0.016[a]1.96 (0.33–11.76)0.461
 Metastatic malignancy3 (18.8)5 (3.0)0.023[a]29.24 (2.08–411.67)0.012[a]
 Peripheral vascular disease1 (6.2)3 (1.8)0.307--
Medication
 Antiplatelet agents7 (43.8)46 (27.4)0.245--
 Vitamin K antagonist2 (12.5)6 (3.6)0.146--
 Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug4 (25.0)33 (19.6)0.533--
 PPI comedication1 (6.2)6 (3.6)1.000--
Blatchford score ≥ 1212 (75.0)99 (58.9)0.209--
Rockall score ≥ 514 (87.5)82 (48.8)0.003[a]1.11 (0.15–8.49)0.920
Endoscopy finding--1.000--
 Peptic ulcer disease13 (81.2)131 (78.0)--
 Nonpeptic ulcer disease3 (18.8)37 (22.0)---
Endoscopy lesion location--0.765--
 Body3 (18.8)44 (26.2)---
 Other than body13 (81.2)124 (73.8)---
High risk endoscopic stigmata (Forrest I, IIa, and IIb)[d]8 (61.5)70 (53.4)0.576--
Tachycardia (heart rate > 100 beat/min) during the admission12 (75.0)50 (29.8)<0.001[a]3.59 (0.60–21.40)0.161
Hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg) during the admission11 (68.8)31 (18.5)<0.001[a]16.63 (2.56–107.90)0.003[a]
Rebleeding within 30 days8 (50.0)19 (11.3)<0.001[a]6.40 (0.80–51.07)0.080
Hospital stay, day6.75 ± 6.665.88 ± 5.740.566--

Values are presented as number (%) or mean ± SD.

CI, confidence interval; SBP, systolic blood pressure; PPI, proton pump inhibitor.

Significant values with p < 0.05.

Nasogastric tube was performed in 177 patients.

Rectal examination was performed in 179 patients.

Classified in 144 patients who had ulcers.

DISCUSSION

In our study, we found that age (≥ 65 years), comorbidity of DM or metastatic malignancy, and hypotension (systolic pressure < 90 mmHg) during hospitalization were independently associated with mortality within 30 days. The 30-day mortality rate was 8.7%, which was slightly higher than the rates of 5.4% and 4.5% reported by the Canadian registry [16] and Italian database study [1], respectively. Although the reason for the higher mortality rate in our study was not clear, it may have been due to differences in the study populations. This study was conducted at a tertiary hospital; therefore, patients’ conditions may have been more severe, which may have contributed to poor patient outcomes and a higher mortality rate. On the other hand, the mortality rate was lower than that in a recent study from England that reported a 28-day mortality rate of 13.1% [17]. It is notable that half of all 30-day deaths occurred within the first 7 days, and all rebleeding-related 30-day deaths also occurred during this period, suggesting that rebleeding was the cause of early death (within 7 days), whereas comorbidities were responsible for later deaths. These findings are consistent with those from the Italian database study in which early death was mainly related to hemorrhage and late death was associated with patients’ comorbidities [18]. In our study, underlying comorbidities were the cause of death in more than half of patients (11/16, 68.8%). Interestingly, 30-day rebleeding was not an independent risk factor of 30-day mortality on multivariate analysis after adjusting for confounding factors, which is in accordance with previous findings [19-21]. Sung et al. [21] reported that 10,429 patients with NVUGIB had 6.2% mortality, and bleeding-related death was observed in only 29.2%; in the remaining patients (70.8%), comorbidities were the cause of death. Therefore, early monitoring of rebleeding in patients with NVUGIB is essential for reducing early death. In patients with comorbidities, long-term monitoring of rebleeding after discharge is an appropriate strategy to reduce mortality. Advanced age is associated with adverse outcomes such as rebleeding or mortality in UGIB [2,22]. Consistent with previous studies, we found that age (≥ 65 years) was an important predictor of 30-day mortality regardless of severity and source of bleeding. It is unclear why the mortality rate in elderly patients with UGIB is so high, but it is likely due to multiple complex factors. For example, elderly patients are more likely to have diverse and complex comorbidities and be more susceptible to physiological changes associated with acute bleeding events than younger patients. Therefore, careful follow-up with intensive monitoring is needed in this population following a bleeding episode. In addition to older age, certain comorbidities such as metastatic malignancies, renal failure, hepatic disease, and heart failure are associated with a greater risk of rebleeding and mortality in patients with UGIB [6,7]. In our study, patients with DM (OR, 12.67; 95% CI, 1.92 to 83.45; p = 0.008) had a high risk of 30-day mortality. There is limited information on how DM contributes to a higher mortality rate in patients with NVUGIB. However, there are several possible explanations. First, although cardiovascular disease was not a predictive factor of 30-day mortality, it accounted for a large proportion of the leading cause of death (7/16 patients) in this study. In general, patients with DM have elevated rates of cardiovascular complications and mortality due to impaired coronary microvascular function [23,24]. Second, diabetic angiopathy impairs mucosal integrity, leading to more severe ulcers [25]. Lastly, DM increases susceptibility to acute gastrointestinal injury and affects mucosal healing [26]. In addition to DM, metastatic malignancy was associated with a higher 30-day mortality rate (OR, 29.24; 95% CI, 2.08 to 411.67; p = 0.012). Critically ill patients with cancer have an overall 30-day mortality rate of up to 50% and a high risk of severe sepsis related to immunosuppression caused by the malignancy and its treatment [27]. We hypothesized that patients with metastatic malignancy may have been in poor physiological condition and more vulnerable to acute illness. In our study, hypotension (systolic pressure < 90 mmHg) during hospitalization was associated with a high risk of 30-day mortality after adjustment for confounding factors (OR, 16.63; 95% CI, 2.56 to 107.90; p = 0.003). These findings are in agreement with those from prior reports showing an association between hemodynamic instability from UGIB and mortality [5-7]. In our study, both Rockall and Blatchford scores were calculated in all of the patients on the basis of clinical and endoscopic index variables. Although 30-day mortality rates tended to be higher in patients with a high Rockall score (≥ 5), this tendency was not observed with the Blatchford score in univariate analysis. However, the Blatchford score was originally designed to assess the need for clinical intervention to control bleeding rather than to predict mortality [7]. Notwithstanding, in the multivariate analysis, the Rockall score also failed to show a significant association with 30-day mortality. To clarify predictive factors of NVUGIB-related death, it would be necessary to compare the predictive factors of 30-day mortality according to endoscopic risk stratification. However, our results showed that no factors were independently associated with 30-day mortality according to Forrest classification, probably due to small sample size. Therefore additional large-scale studies are needed to identify predictors associated with 30-day mortality in patients with NVUGIB. The strengths of this study include its prospective design and inclusion of many factors potentially predictive of mortality in NVUGIB. In addition, the effects of various debated factors on clinical outcomes of patients with NVUGIB were analyzed by examining the data from high-risk patients after adjusting for severity of bleeding. We also attempted to solve the colinearity problem by including Rockall scores ≥ 5 rather than continuous Rockall scores in the multivariate analysis. This study had several limitations. First, it was a single-center study with a relatively small sample size, which could lead to sampling bias. Second, the causes of death may have been, to some extent, subjective. However, we assumed that the cause of death, as determined on the basis of imaging findings, clinical symptoms and signs, might have been clinically relevant. Third, although Helicobacter pylori eradication reduces rebleeding in patients with peptic ulcers, we did not test for its presence in our patients [28]. Despite these limitations, our findings provide valuable insight on the outcomes of patients with NVUGIB. In conclusion, the risk of 30-day mortality in patients with UGIB was significantly higher in patients with advanced age, comorbidity of DM or metastatic malignancy, and hemodynamic instability during hospitalization. These findings suggest that aggressive management and careful monitoring according to specific guidelines should be provided for high-risk patients. Additional prospective studies with a larger number of subjects are needed to support these findings. 1. This study demonstrates that comorbidity of diabetes mellitus or metastatic malignancy, age ≥ 65 years and hemodynamic instability during hospitalization are risk factors of 30-day mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. 2. Early death was mainly caused by hemorrhage, whereas death after hospital discharge was mainly caused by patients’ comorbidities.
  28 in total

1.  [The 86th Congress of the Japanese Society of Legal Medicine. Okayama, Japan. April 17-19, 2002. Abstracts].

Authors: 
Journal:  Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi       Date:  2002-03

2.  Endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  J A Forrest; N D Finlayson; D J Shearman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-08-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Diabetes and 30-day mortality from peptic ulcer bleeding and perforation: a Danish population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Reimar W Thomsen; Anders Riis; Steffen Christensen; Mette Nørgaard; Henrik T Sørensen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Impact of alcohol on the histological and clinical progression of hepatitis C infection.

Authors:  T E Wiley; M McCarthy; L Breidi; M McCarthy; T J Layden
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  T A Rockall; R F Logan; H B Devlin; T C Northfield
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  O Blatchford; W R Murray; M Blatchford
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-10-14       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Simple clinical predictors may obviate urgent endoscopy in selected patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.

Authors:  Joseph Romagnuolo; Alan N Barkun; Robert Enns; David Armstrong; Jamie Gregor
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-02-12

8.  The Canadian Registry on Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Endoscopy (RUGBE): Endoscopic hemostasis and proton pump inhibition are associated with improved outcomes in a real-life setting.

Authors:  Alan Barkun; Sandrine Sabbah; Robert Enns; David Armstrong; Jamie Gregor; Richard N N Fedorak; Elham Rahme; Youssef Toubouti; Myriam Martel; Naoki Chiba; Carlo A Fallone
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Improved survival of critically ill cancer patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Jérôme Larché; Elie Azoulay; Fabienne Fieux; Laurent Mesnard; Delphine Moreau; Guillaume Thiery; Michaël Darmon; Jean-Roger Le Gall; Benoît Schlemmer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Meta-analysis: Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradication therapy for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer.

Authors:  J P Gisbert; S Khorrami; F Carballo; X Calvet; E Gene; E Dominguez-Muñoz
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 8.171

View more
  4 in total

1.  Risk factors for mortality among patients admitted with upper gastrointestinal bleeding at a tertiary hospital: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sibtain M Moledina; Ewaldo Komba
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Risk factors of in-hospital mortality among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Lingjie He; Jianwei Zhang; Shutian Zhang
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.485

3.  Predictors of rebleeding and in-hospital mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper digestive bleeding.

Authors:  Daniela Cornelia Lazăr; Sorin Ursoniu; Adrian Goldiş
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  Timing of endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Jeemyoung Kim; Eun Jeong Gong; Myeongsook Seo; Jong Kyu Park; Sang Jin Lee; Koon Hee Han; Young Don Kim; Woo Jin Jeong; Gab Jin Cheon; Hyun Il Seo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.