Literature DB >> 23161291

An observational European study on clinical outcomes associated with current management strategies for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ENERGIB-Turkey).

Zeynel Mungan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This observational, retrospective cohort study assessed outcomes of the current management strategies for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in several European countries (Belgium, Greece, Italy, Norway, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey) (NCT00797641; ENERGIB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Turkey contributed 23 sites to this study. Adult patients (≥18 years old) consecutively admitted to hospital and who underwent endoscopy for overt non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (hematemesis, melena or hematochezia, with other clinical/laboratory evidence of acute upper GI blood loss) were included in the study. Data were collected from patient medical records regarding bleeding continuation, re-bleeding, pharmacological treatment, surgery, and mortality during a 30-day follow-up period.
RESULTS: A total of 423 patients (67.4% men; mean age: 57.8 ± 18.9 years) were enrolled in the Turkish study centers, of whom 96.2% were admitted to hospital with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. At admission, the most common symptom was melena (76.1%); 28.6% of patients were taking aspirin, 19.9% were on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and 7.3% were on proton pump inhibitors. The most common diagnoses were duodenal (45.2%) and gastric (27.7%) ulcers and gastritis/gastric erosions (26.2%). Patients were most often managed in general medical wards (45.4%). A gastrointestinal team was in charge of treatment in 64.8% of cases. Therapeutic procedures were performed in 32.4% of patients during endoscopy. After the endoscopy, most patients (94.6%) received proton pump inhibitors. Mean (SD) hospital stay was 5.36 ± 4.91 days. The cumulative proportions of continued bleeding/re-bleeding, complications and mortality within 30 days of the non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding episode were 9.0%, 5.7% and 2.8%, respectively. In the Turkish sub-group of patients, the significant risk factors for bleeding continuation or re-bleeding were age >65 years, presentation with hematemesis or shock/syncope, and the diagnosis of duodenal ulcer. The risk of clinical complications after non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding was higher in female patients older than 65 years, in patients with comorbidities, and in patients presenting with shock/syncope, and also according to time to endoscopy. The use of aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or warfarin at baseline was negatively associated with the development of bleeding or clinical complications. The risk of death within 30 days after non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding was significantly higher in patients older than 65 years and in those receiving transfusions other than intravenous fluid or red blood cells within 12 hours of presentation.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the survey results, non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Turkey varies from that in other European countries in a number of aspects. These differences could be associated with a younger population and Helicobacter pylori incidence. Despite the diminishing need for surgical intervention and mortality rates for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding, as is the case in other European countries, non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding remains a serious problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23161291     DOI: 10.4318/tjg.2012.0402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1300-4948            Impact factor:   1.852


  4 in total

1.  Is the AIMS65 score useful in predicting outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding?

Authors:  Sung Hoon Jung; Jung Hwan Oh; Hye Yeon Lee; Joon Won Jeong; Se Eun Go; Chan Ran You; Eun Jung Jeon; Sang Wook Choi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Upper-gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to peptic ulcer disease: incidence and outcomes.

Authors:  Samuel Quan; Alexandra Frolkis; Kaylee Milne; Natalie Molodecky; Hong Yang; Elijah Dixon; Chad G Ball; Robert P Myers; Subrata Ghosh; Robert Hilsden; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Gilaad G Kaplan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Predictive factors of mortality within 30 days in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Yoo Jin Lee; Bo Ram Min; Eun Soo Kim; Kyung Sik Park; Kwang Bum Cho; Byoung Kuk Jang; Woo Jin Chung; Jae Seok Hwang; Seong Woo Jeon
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.884

4.  Peptic Ulcer Is the Most Common Cause of Non-Variceal Upper-Gastrointestinal Bleeding (NVUGIB) in China.

Authors:  Mingliang Lu; Gang Sun; Xiao-Mei Zhang; You-Qing Xv; Shi-Yao Chen; Ying Song; Xue-Liang Li; Bin Lv; Jian-Lin Ren; Xue-Qing Chen; Hui Zhang; Chen Mo; Yan-Zhi Wang; Yun-Sheng Yang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-10-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.