Literature DB >> 19755976

Causes of mortality in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective cohort study of 10,428 cases.

Joseph J Y Sung1, Kelvin K F Tsoi, Terry K W Ma, Man-Yee Yung, James Y W Lau, Philip W Y Chiu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite advances in endoscopic and pharmacological treatment for peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB), mortality remains at 5-10% worldwide. Our aim was to investigate the causes of death in a prospective cohort of PUB in a tertiary referral center.
METHODS: Between 1993 and 2005, all patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) admitted to the Prince of Wales Hospital were prospectively registered. Demographic data, characteristics of ulcer, and pharmacological, endoscopic, and surgical therapy, were documented. Mortality cases were classified as (A) bleeding-related death (A1: uncontrolled bleeding, A2: within 48 h after endoscopy, A3: during surgery for uncontrolled bleeding, A4: surgical complications or within 1 month after surgery, and A5: endoscopic related mortality) or (B) non-bleeding-related death (B1: cardiac causes, B2: pulmonary causes, B3: cerebrovascular disease, B4: multiorgan failure, and B5: terminal malignancy).
RESULTS: In all, 18,508 cases of UGIB were enrolled; among them, 10,428 cases from 9,375 patients were confirmed to have PUB, and 577 (6.2%) patients died. There were significantly more patients who died of non-ulcer bleeding causes (79.7%) than bleeding causes (18.4%). The mean (s.d.) age of those who died of bleeding-related causes was higher (75.4 (12.6) years) than that of those who died of non-bleeding causes (71.7 (13.1) years) (P=0.010). Most bleeding-related deaths occurred when immediate control of bleeding failed (29.2%) or when patients died within 48 h after endoscopic therapy (25.5%). Among those who died of non-bleeding-related causes, multiorgan failure (23.9%), pulmonary conditions (23.5%), and terminal malignancy (33.7%) were most common.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of PUB patients died of non-bleeding-related causes. Optimization of management should aim at reducing the risk of multiorgan failure and cardiopulmonary death instead of focusing merely on successful hemostasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19755976     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  64 in total

Review 1.  Restrictive vs liberal transfusion for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Yong-Xin Bao; Ming Bai; Yong-Guo Zhang; Wen-Da Xu; Xing-Shun Qi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?

Authors:  Sara Monteiro; Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves; Joana Magalhães; José Cotter
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

3.  The clinical and cost implications of failed endoscopic hemostasis in gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding.

Authors:  Ann Roy; Micheline Kim; Robert Hawes; Shyam Varadarajulu
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 4.  Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly: aetiology, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Asma Ahmed; Adrian J Stanley
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Optimizing the use of aspirin for cardiovascular prevention.

Authors:  Rubén Casado-Arroyo; Carlos Sostres; Angel Lanas
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Rockall score in predicting outcomes of elderly patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Chang-Yuan Wang; Jian Qin; Jing Wang; Chang-Yi Sun; Tao Cao; Dan-Dan Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Successful Endoscopic Hemostasis Is a Protective Factor for Rebleeding and Mortality in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Yong Jae Han; Jae Myung Cha; Jae Hyun Park; Jung Won Jeon; Hyun Phil Shin; Kwang Ro Joo; Joung Il Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  The influence of etiologic factors on clinical outcome in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.

Authors:  Neven Ljubičić; Zeljko Puljiz; Ivan Budimir; Alen Bišćanin; Andre Bratanić; Tajana Pavić; Marko Nikolić; Davor Hrabar; Vladimir Supanc
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Community-based evaluation of laparoscopic versus open simple closure of perforated peptic ulcers.

Authors:  Kazuaki Kuwabara; Shinya Matsuda; Kiyohide Fushimi; Koichi B Ishikawa; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Kenji Fujimori
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  New and emerging endoscopic haemostasis techniques.

Authors:  Rebecca Palmer; Barbara Braden
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.