Literature DB >> 8675081

Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

T A Rockall1, R F Logan, H B Devlin, T C Northfield.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish the relative importance of risk factors for mortality after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and to formulate a simple numerical scoring system that categorizes patients by risk. A prospective, unselected, multicentre, population based study was undertaken using standardised questionnaires in two phases one year apart. A total of 4185 cases of acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage over the age of 16 identified over a four month period in 1993 and 1625 cases identified subsequently over a three month period in 1994 were included in the study. It was found that age, shock, comorbidity, diagnosis, major stigmata of recent haemorrhage, and rebleeding are all independent predictors of mortality when assessed using multiple logistic regression. A numerical score using these parameters has been developed that closely follows the predictions generated by logistical regression equations. Haemoglobin, sex, presentation (other than shock), and drug therapy (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anticoagulants) are not represented in the final model. When tested for general applicability in a second population, the scoring system was found to reproducibly predict mortality in each risk category. In conclusion, a simple numerical score can be used to categorize patients presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage by risk of death. This score can be used to determine case mix when comparing outcomes in audit and research and to calculate risk standardised mortality. In addition, this risk score can identify 15% of all cases with acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage at the time of presentation and 26% of cases after endoscopy who are at low risk of rebleeding and negligible risk of death and who might therefore be considered for early discharge or outpatient treatment with consequent resource savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8675081      PMCID: PMC1383057          DOI: 10.1136/gut.38.3.316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  16 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic haemostasis for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  R J Steele
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Mortality in patients with haematemesis and melaena: a prospective study.

Authors:  P S Hunt; J Hansky; M G Korman
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-05-12

3.  Clinical factors in the prediction of further haemorrhage or mortality in acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  A E Clason; D A Macleod; R A Elton
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  The visible vessel as an indicator of uncontrolled or recurrent gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

Authors:  W J Griffiths; D A Neumann; J D Welsh
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Factors identifying the probability of further haemorrhage after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  I A MacLeod; P R Mills
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Endoscopic prediction of recurrent bleeding in peptic ulcers.

Authors:  D W Storey; S G Bown; C P Swain; P R Salmon; J S Kirkham; T C Northfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-10-15       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Factors influencing mortality in patients with bleeding ulcer. Review of 7 years' experience preceding therapeutic endoscopy.

Authors:  P Wara; V Berg; E Amdrup
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1983

8.  Importance of hypovolaemic shock and endoscopic signs in predicting recurrent haemorrhage from peptic ulceration: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  P C Bornman; N A Theodorou; R D Shuttleworth; H P Essel; I N Marks
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-07-27

9.  Controlled trial of Nd-YAG laser photocoagulation in bleeding peptic ulcers.

Authors:  C P Swain; J S Kirkham; P R Salmon; S G Bown; T C Northfield
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-05-17       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Further haemorrhage after admission to hospital for gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  P F Jones; S J Johnston; A B McEwan; J Kyle; C D Needham
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-09-29
View more
  288 in total

Review 1.  Methods for avoiding proteolytic artefacts in studies of enzymes and other proteins from yeasts.

Authors:  J R Pringle
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 1.441

2.  Prediction scores or gastroenterologists' Gut Feeling for triaging patients that present with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Nl de Groot; Mgh van Oijen; K Kessels; M Hemmink; Blam Weusten; R Timmer; Wl Hazen; N van Lelyveld; Wl Curvers; Lc Baak; R Verburg; Jh Bosman; Lrh de Wijkerslooth; J de Rooij; Ng Venneman; M Pennings; K van Hee; Rch Scheffer; Rl van Eijk; R Meiland; Pd Siersema; Aj Bredenoord
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Safety of esophagogastroduodenoscopy within 30 days of myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort study from a Canadian tertiary centre.

Authors:  Fahad Al-Ebrahim; Khurram J Khan; Waleed Alhazzani; Ahmed Alnemer; Abdullah Alzahrani; John Marshall; David Armstrong
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  I L P Beales
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: guidelines.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Management of haematemesis and melaena.

Authors:  K Palmer
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Clinical guidelines online: do they improve compliance?

Authors:  J G Williams; W Y Cheung; D E Price; R Tansey; I T Russell; P D Duane; S A Al-Ismail; M A Wani
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with End Stage Renal Disease: Causes, Characteristics and Factors Associated with Need for Endoscopic Therapeutic Intervention.

Authors:  Syed Mudassir Laeeq; Abbas Ali Tasneem; Farina M Hanif; Nasir Hassan Luck; Rajesh Mandhwani; Rajesh Wadhva
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2017-06-30

9.  Etiology and adverse outcome predictors of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 589 patients in Nepal.

Authors:  Umid Kumar Shrestha; Subash Sapkota
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dennis Shung; Michael Simonov; Mark Gentry; Benjamin Au; Loren Laine
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.