Literature DB >> 26752731

Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.

Alessandra S Souza1, Laura Rerko1, Klaus Oberauer1.   

Abstract

Visual working memory (VWM) has a limited capacity. This limitation can be mitigated by the use of focused attention: if attention is drawn to the relevant working memory content before test, performance improves (the so-called retro-cue benefit). This study tests 2 explanations of the retro-cue benefit: (a) Focused attention protects memory representations from interference by visual input at test, and (b) focusing attention enhances retrieval. Across 6 experiments using color recognition and color reproduction tasks, we varied the amount of color interference at test, and the delay between a retrieval cue (i.e., the retro-cue) and the memory test. Retro-cue benefits were larger when the memory test introduced interfering visual stimuli, showing that the retro-cue effect is in part because of protection from visual interference. However, when visual interference was held constant, retro-cue benefits were still obtained whenever the retro-cue enabled retrieval of an object from VWM but delayed response selection. Our results show that accessible information in VWM might be lost in the processes of testing memory because of visual interference and incomplete retrieval. This is not an inevitable state of affairs, though: Focused attention can be used to get the most out of VWM. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26752731     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  29 in total

1.  Contralateral Delay Activity Tracks Fluctuations in Working Memory Performance.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Matthew K Robison; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Reprioritization of Features of Multidimensional Objects Stored in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Young Eun Park; Jocelyn L Sy; Sang Wook Hong; Frank Tong
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-09-28

3.  Restoration of fMRI Decodability Does Not Imply Latent Working Memory States.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneegans; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Retrospective Attention in Short-Term Memory Has a Lasting Effect on Long-Term Memory Across Age.

Authors:  Jonathan Strunk; Lauren Morgan; Sarah Reaves; Paul Verhaeghen; Audrey Duarte
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Retrospective Cues Mitigate Information Loss in Human Cortex during Working Memory Storage.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Asal Nouri; Laura Rodriguez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Distraction in Visual Working Memory: Resistance is Not Futile.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Lorenc; Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Tracking attentional states: Assessing the relationship between sustained and selective focused attention in visual working memory.

Authors:  Andra Arnicane; Alessandra S Souza
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Working memory prioritization impacts neural recovery from distraction.

Authors:  Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Mnemonic attention in analogy to perceptual attention: harmony but not uniformity.

Authors:  Sizhu Han; Yixuan Ku
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-07-09

10.  And like that, they were gone: A failure to remember recently attended unique faces.

Authors:  Joyce Tam; Michael K Mugno; Ryan E O'Donnell; Brad Wyble
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.