Literature DB >> 29669029

Retrospective Attention in Short-Term Memory Has a Lasting Effect on Long-Term Memory Across Age.

Jonathan Strunk1, Lauren Morgan1, Sarah Reaves1, Paul Verhaeghen1, Audrey Duarte1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Declines in both short- and long-term memory are typical of healthy aging. Recent findings suggest that retrodictive attentional cues ("retro-cues") that indicate the location of to-be-probed items in short-term memory (STM) have a lasting impact on long-term memory (LTM) performance in young adults. Whether older adults can also use retro-cues to facilitate both STM and LTM is unknown.
METHOD: Young and older adults performed a visual STM task in which spatially informative retro-cues or noninformative neutral-cues were presented during STM maintenance of real-world objects. We tested participants' memory at both STM and LTM delays for objects that were previously cued with retrodictive or neutral-cues during STM order to measure the lasting impact of retrospective attention on LTM.
RESULTS: Older adults showed reduced STM and LTM capacity compared to young adults. However, they showed similar magnitude retro-cue memory benefits as young adults at both STM and LTM delays. DISCUSSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate whether retro-cues in STM facilitate the encoding of objects into LTM such that they are more likely to be subsequently retrieved by older adults. Our results support the idea that retrospective attention can be an effective means by which older adults can improve their STM and LTM performance, even in the context of reduced memory capacity.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Improvement; Objects; Retro-cues; Visual

Year:  2019        PMID: 29669029      PMCID: PMC6941208          DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gby045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  41 in total

Review 1.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency.

Authors:  M E Faust; D A Balota; D H Spieler; F R Ferraro
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness.

Authors:  Rogier Landman; Henk Spekreijse; Victor A F Lamme
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Long-term memory prepares neural activity for perception.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes; Kathryn Atherton; Eva Zita Patai; Anna Christina Nobre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: protection or prioritization?

Authors:  Michi Matsukura; Steven J Luck; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-11

5.  Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory.

Authors:  Laura Rerko; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect.

Authors:  Alessandra S Souza; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Behavioral and Neural Markers of Flexible Attention over Working Memory in Aging.

Authors:  Robert M Mok; Nicholas E Myers; George Wallis; Anna Christina Nobre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research.

Authors:  Mathieu B Brodeur; Emmanuelle Dionne-Dostie; Tina Montreuil; Martin Lepage
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results.

Authors:  Zoltan Dienes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-29
View more
  1 in total

1.  Leveraging the Power of Networks to Support Healthy Aging.

Authors:  Janelle N Beadle
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.077

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.