Literature DB >> 28820674

Restoration of fMRI Decodability Does Not Imply Latent Working Memory States.

Sebastian Schneegans1, Paul M Bays1.   

Abstract

Recent imaging studies have challenged the prevailing view that working memory is mediated by sustained neural activity. Using machine learning methods to reconstruct memory content, these studies found that previously diminished representations can be restored by retrospective cueing or other forms of stimulation. These findings have been interpreted as evidence for an activity-silent working memory state that can be reactivated dependent on task demands. Here, we test the validity of this conclusion by formulating a neural process model of working memory based on sustained activity and using this model to emulate a spatial recall task with retro-cueing. The simulation reproduces both behavioral and fMRI results previously taken as evidence for latent states, in particular the restoration of spatial reconstruction quality following an informative cue. Our results demonstrate that recovery of the decodability of an imaging signal does not provide compelling evidence for an activity-silent working memory state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28820674      PMCID: PMC5889105          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  63 in total

Review 1.  Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity.

Authors:  X J Wang
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Hongsup Shin; Wen-Chuang Chou; Ryan George; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory.

Authors:  Laura Rerko; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.

Authors:  Alessandra S Souza; Laura Rerko; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect.

Authors:  Alessandra S Souza; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Neuron activity related to short-term memory.

Authors:  J M Fuster; G E Alexander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Model-based functional neuroimaging using dynamic neural fields: An integrative cognitive neuroscience approach.

Authors:  Sobanawartiny Wijeakumar; Joseph P Ambrose; John P Spencer; Rodica Curtu
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.223

8.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Beyond slots and resources: grounding cognitive concepts in neural dynamics.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Vanessa R Simmering; Aaron T Buss
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Decoding attended information in short-term memory: an EEG study.

Authors:  Joshua J LaRocque; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Andrew T Drysdale; Klaus Oberauer; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  14 in total

1.  Cortical specialization for attended versus unattended working memory.

Authors:  Thomas B Christophel; Polina Iamshchinina; Chang Yan; Carsten Allefeld; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Retrospective Cues Mitigate Information Loss in Human Cortex during Working Memory Storage.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Asal Nouri; Laura Rodriguez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A dynamic neural field model of continuous input integration.

Authors:  Weronika Wojtak; Stephen Coombes; Daniele Avitabile; Estela Bicho; Wolfram Erlhagen
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Priority-based transformations of stimulus representation in visual working memory.

Authors:  Quan Wan; Jorge A Menendez; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.779

5.  Towards a better understanding of information storage in visual working memory.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2021-07-01

6.  Working memory prioritization impacts neural recovery from distraction.

Authors:  Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 7.  The what, where and how of delay activity.

Authors:  Kartik K Sreenivasan; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Circuit mechanisms for the maintenance and manipulation of information in working memory.

Authors:  Nicolas Y Masse; Guangyu R Yang; H Francis Song; Xiao-Jing Wang; David J Freedman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 28.771

9.  Drift in Neural Population Activity Causes Working Memory to Deteriorate Over Time.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneegans; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Persistent Activity During Working Memory From Front to Back.

Authors:  Clayton E Curtis; Thomas C Sprague
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.