Literature DB >> 26744037

Counterintuitive effects of negative social feedback on attention.

Brian A Anderson1.   

Abstract

Which stimuli we pay attention to is strongly influenced by learning. Stimuli previously associated with reward outcomes, such as money and food, and stimuli previously associated with aversive outcomes, such as monetary loss and electric shock, automatically capture attention. Social reward (happy expressions) can bias attention towards associated stimuli, but the role of negative social feedback in biasing attentional selection remains unexplored. On the one hand, negative social feedback often serves to discourage particular behaviours. If attentional selection can be curbed much like any other behavioural preference, we might expect stimuli associated with negative social feedback to be more readily ignored. On the other hand, if negative social feedback influences attention in the same way that other aversive outcomes do, such feedback might ironically bias attention towards the stimuli it is intended to discourage selection of. In the present study, participants first completed a training phase in which colour targets were associated with negative social feedback. Then, in a subsequent test phase, these same colour stimuli served as task-irrelevant distractors during a visual search task. The results strongly support the latter interpretation in that stimuli previously associated with negative social feedback impaired search performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Selective attention; aversive conditioning; punishment; social feedback

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26744037      PMCID: PMC5575918          DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1122576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Emot        ISSN: 0269-9931


  27 in total

1.  Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses.

Authors:  Chiara Della Libera; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05-05

2.  Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search.

Authors:  Senqing Qi; Qinghong Zeng; Cody Ding; Hong Li
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum.

Authors:  Keise Izuma; Daisuke N Saito; Norihiro Sadato
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  When goals conflict with values: counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli.

Authors:  Mike E Le Pelley; Daniel Pearson; Oren Griffiths; Tom Beesley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-11-24

5.  Neural evidence reveals the rapid effects of reward history on selective attention.

Authors:  Mary H MacLean; Barry Giesbrecht
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Interaction between value and perceptual salience in value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Lihui Wang; Hongbo Yu; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Perceptual effects of social salience: evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching.

Authors:  Jie Sui; Xun He; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Value-driven attentional priority signals in human basal ganglia and visual cortex.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Patryk A Laurent; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Why skill matters.

Authors:  Okihide Hikosaka; Shinya Yamamoto; Masaharu Yasuda; Hyoung F Kim
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  5 in total

1.  Neural correlates of attentional capture by stimuli previously associated with social reward.

Authors:  Andy J Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.065

2.  On the value-dependence of value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Madeline Halpern
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  On the automaticity of attentional orienting to threatening stimuli.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Mark K Britton
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-03-14

4.  Punishment-modulated attentional capture is context specific.

Authors:  Laurent Grégoire; Haena Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Motiv Sci       Date:  2020-12-10

5.  Previously reward-associated sounds interfere with goal-directed auditory processing.

Authors:  Andy J Kim; David S Lee; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.138

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.