Literature DB >> 25701717

Neural evidence reveals the rapid effects of reward history on selective attention.

Mary H MacLean1, Barry Giesbrecht2.   

Abstract

Selective attention is often framed as being primarily driven by two factors: task-relevance and physical salience. However, factors like selection and reward history, which are neither currently task-relevant nor physically salient, can reliably and persistently influence visual selective attention. The current study investigated the nature of the persistent effects of irrelevant, physically non-salient, reward-associated features. These features affected one of the earliest reliable neural indicators of visual selective attention in humans, the P1 event-related potential, measured one week after the reward associations were learned. However, the effects of reward history were moderated by current task demands. The modulation of visually evoked activity supports the hypothesis that reward history influences the innate salience of reward associated features, such that even when no longer relevant, nor physically salient, these features have a rapid, persistent, and robust effect on early visual selective attention.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; ERP; Reward

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25701717     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  25 in total

1.  Reward breaks through center-surround inhibition via anterior insula.

Authors:  Lihui Wang; Hongbo Yu; Jie Hu; Jan Theeuwes; Xiaoliang Gong; Yang Xiang; Changjun Jiang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Value-based attentional capture influences context-dependent decision-making.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Napat Rangsipat; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Value-driven attentional capture is modulated by the contents of working memory: An EEG study.

Authors:  T Hinault; K J Blacker; M Gormley; B A Anderson; S M Courtney
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  On the relationship between value-driven and stimulus-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Neural correlates of attentional capture by stimuli previously associated with social reward.

Authors:  Andy J Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.065

6.  Stress diminishes outcome but enhances response representations during instrumental learning.

Authors:  Jacqueline Katharina Meier; Bernhard P Staresina; Lars Schwabe
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 8.713

7.  Spatial task relevance modulates value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Xiaojin Ma; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  Counterintuitive effects of negative social feedback on attention.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2016-01-08

9.  Dissociable signatures of visual salience and behavioral relevance across attentional priority maps in human cortex.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Vy A Vo; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Nicholas Gaspelin; Charles L Folk; Roger W Remington; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.