Literature DB >> 25420117

When goals conflict with values: counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli.

Mike E Le Pelley1, Daniel Pearson1, Oren Griffiths1, Tom Beesley1.   

Abstract

Attention provides the gateway to cognition, by selecting certain stimuli for further analysis. Recent research demonstrates that whether a stimulus captures attention is not determined solely by its physical properties, but is malleable, being influenced by our previous experience of rewards obtained by attending to that stimulus. Here we show that this influence of reward learning on attention extends to task-irrelevant stimuli. In a visual search task, certain stimuli signaled the magnitude of available reward, but reward delivery was not contingent on responding to those stimuli. Indeed, any attentional capture by these critical distractor stimuli led to a reduction in the reward obtained. Nevertheless, distractors signaling large reward produced greater attentional and oculomotor capture than those signaling small reward. This counterproductive capture by task-irrelevant stimuli is important because it demonstrates how external reward structures can produce patterns of behavior that conflict with task demands, and similar processes may underlie problematic behavior directed toward real-world rewards.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25420117     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  74 in total

1.  Oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal the availability of reward.

Authors:  Michel Failing; Tom Nissens; Daniel Pearson; Mike Le Pelley; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Mikhail S Spektor; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Valerie M Beck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Mechanisms of habitual approach: Failure to suppress irrelevant responses evoked by previously reward-associated stimuli.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Charles L Folk; Rebecca Garrison; Leeland Rogers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-04-07

5.  Selection history is relative.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Reward learning biases the direction of saccades.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-11-27

7.  On the distinction between value-driven attention and selection history: Evidence from individuals with depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Michelle Chiu; Michelle M DiBartolo; Stephanie L Leal
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

Review 8.  Controlled information processing, automaticity, and the burden of proof.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

9.  Reduced attentional capture by reward following an acute dose of alcohol.

Authors:  Poppy Watson; Daniel Pearson; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Counterintuitive effects of negative social feedback on attention.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2016-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.