Literature DB >> 33438522

Previously reward-associated sounds interfere with goal-directed auditory processing.

Andy J Kim1, David S Lee1, Brian A Anderson1.   

Abstract

Previously reward-associated stimuli have consistently been shown to involuntarily capture attention in the visual domain. Although previously reward-associated but currently task-irrelevant sounds have also been shown to interfere with visual processing, it remains unclear whether such stimuli can interfere with the processing of task-relevant auditory information. To address this question, we modified a dichotic listening task to measure interference from task-irrelevant but previously reward-associated sounds. In a training phase, participants were simultaneously presented with a spoken letter and number in different auditory streams and learned to associate the correct identification of each of three letters with high, low, and no monetary reward, respectively. In a subsequent test phase, participants were again presented with the same auditory stimuli but were instead instructed to report the number while ignoring spoken letters. In both the training and test phases, response time measures demonstrated that attention was biased in favour of the auditory stimulus associated with high value. Our findings demonstrate that attention can be biased towards learned reward cues in the auditory domain, interfering with goal-directed auditory processing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional capture; associative learning; auditory attention; reward

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33438522      PMCID: PMC8439143          DOI: 10.1177/1747021821990033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.138


  43 in total

1.  Attentional enhancement for positive and negative tones at an early stage of auditory processing.

Authors:  Tímea Folyi; Heinrich René Liesefeld; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Neural basis of auditory-induced shifts in visual time-order perception.

Authors:  John J McDonald; Wolfgang A Teder-Sälejärvi; Francesco Di Russo; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-31       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Attention-driven auditory cortex short-term plasticity helps segregate relevant sounds from noise.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Matti Hämäläinen; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Seppo P Ahlfors; Samantha Huang; Fa-Hsuan Lin; Tommi Raij; Mikko Sams; Christos E Vasios; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Neural correlates of attentional capture by stimuli previously associated with social reward.

Authors:  Andy J Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.065

6.  On the value-dependence of value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Madeline Halpern
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Neural effects of cognitive control load on auditory selective attention.

Authors:  Merav Sabri; Colin Humphries; Matthew Verber; Einat Liebenthal; Jeffrey R Binder; Jain Mangalathu; Anjali Desai
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Persistence of value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Reward guides vision when it's your thing: trait reward-seeking in reward-mediated visual priming.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Leonardo Chelazzi; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Auditory attentional selection is biased by reward cues.

Authors:  Erkin Asutay; Daniel Västfjäll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  How Does Threat Modulate the Motivational Effects of Reward on Attention?

Authors:  Andy J Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2021-05

2.  Reward magnitude enhances early attentional processing of auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Elise Demeter; Brittany Glassberg; Marissa L Gamble; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Value-Biased Competition in the Auditory System of the Brain.

Authors:  Andy J Kim; Laurent Grégoire; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.420

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.