Literature DB >> 23916733

Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search.

Senqing Qi1, Qinghong Zeng, Cody Ding, Hong Li.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate whether a physically non-salient and task-irrelevant stimulus feature previously associated with reward can capture attention. In the training phase, participants implicitly associated a certain color with reward. In the subsequent test phase, participants searched for a uniquely shaped singleton among non-target shapes, with color completely irrelevant to the current task demand. Response time was delayed on trials wherein the target was simultaneously presented with an associated distracter, compared with trials without one. In ERPs, a lateralized reward-associated distracter elicited an N2pc component when a concurrent target was presented on the vertical meridian. The control experiment discounted the possibility that this N2pc was caused by familiarity of the reward-associated distracter. Presenting both the target and reward-associated distracter on the opposite side elicited N2pc, with the reward-associated distracter-elicited N2pc preceding the target-elicited N2pc, albeit only in trials with slow responses. These results show that the participants shifted their attention to the target only after noticing the task-irrelevant reward-associated distracter in slow trials. Therefore, task-irrelevant reward-driven salience can capture attention. Distracter positivity was observed in fast distracter-present trials presenting both a lateral distracter and a midline target. Thus, the reward-associated distracter should be actively suppressed to efficiently select the task-relevant target. Lastly, the distracter-elicited N2pc was negatively correlated with individual differences in reward drive score. This correlation may provide insight into reward sensitivity problems.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional capture; Distracter positivity (Pd); N2pc; Reward; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23916733     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  31 in total

1.  Reward breaks through center-surround inhibition via anterior insula.

Authors:  Lihui Wang; Hongbo Yu; Jie Hu; Jan Theeuwes; Xiaoliang Gong; Yang Xiang; Changjun Jiang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal the availability of reward.

Authors:  Michel Failing; Tom Nissens; Daniel Pearson; Mike Le Pelley; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The role of reward prediction in the control of attention.

Authors:  Anthony W Sali; Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Value-based attentional capture influences context-dependent decision-making.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Napat Rangsipat; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Measuring attention to reward as an individual trait: the value-driven attention questionnaire (VDAQ).

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim; Mark K Britton; Andy Jeesu Kim
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-06-12

6.  Value-Driven Attentional Capture is Modulated by Spatial Context.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015

7.  Selection history is relative.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  An electrophysiological dissociation of craving and stimulus-dependent attentional capture in smokers.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Marty G Woldorff; Jens-Max Hopf; Joseph A Harris; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Mircea A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Counterintuitive effects of negative social feedback on attention.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2016-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.