Literature DB >> 26732744

Phantom-based characterization of distortion on a magnetic resonance imaging simulator for radiation oncology.

Ke Colin Huang1, Yue Cao, Umar Baharom, James M Balter.   

Abstract

One of the major issues potentially limiting treatment planning with solely MR images is the possibility of geometric distortion inherent in MR images. We designed a large distortion phantom containing a 3D array of spheres and proposed a three-dimensional (3D) approach to determine the distortion of MR image volume. The approach to overcome partially filled spheres is also presented. The phantom was assembled with a 3D array of spheres filled with contrast and was scanned with a 3T MRI simulator. A 3D whole-sphere or half-sphere template is used to match the image pattern. The half-sphere template is used when the normalized cross-correlation value for the whole-sphere template is below a predetermined threshold. Procrustes method was applied to remove the shift induced by rotation and translation of the phantom. Then the distortion map was generated. Accuracy of the method was verified using CT images of a small phantom of the same design. The analysis of the small phantom showed that the method is accurate with an average offset of estimated sphere center 0.12 ± 0.04 mm. The Procrustes analysis estimated the rotation angle to be 1.95° and 0.01°, respectively, when the phantom was placed at 2° and 0° from the ceiling laser. The analysis showed that on the central plane through the magnet center, the average displacement is less than 1 mm for all radii. At distal planes, when the radius is less than 18 cm, the average displacement is less than 1 mm. However, the average displacement is over 1 mm but still less than 1.5 mm for larger radii. A large distortion phantom was assembled and analysis software was developed to characterize distortions in MRI scans. The use of two templates helps reduce the potential impact of residual air bubbles in some of the spheres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26732744      PMCID: PMC4733606          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  23 in total

1.  Reproducibility of geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging based on phantom studies.

Authors:  T Mizowaki; Y Nagata; K Okajima; M Kokubo; Y Negoro; N Araki; M Hiraoka
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  A proposed scheme for comprehensive characterization of the measured geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging using a three-dimensional phantom.

Authors:  Deming Wang; David M Doddrell
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems Part I: evaluation using a 3D phantom.

Authors:  Deming Wang; Wendy Strugnell; Gary Cowin; David M Doddrell; Richard Slaughter
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Accuracy of device-specific 2D and 3D image distortion correction algorithms for magnetic resonance imaging of the head provided by a manufacturer.

Authors:  Christian P Karger; Angelika Höss; Rolf Bendl; Valer Canda; Lothar Schad
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A complete distortion correction for MR images: I. Gradient warp correction.

Authors:  Simon J Doran; Liz Charles-Edwards; Stefan A Reinsberg; Martin O Leach
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Characterization, prediction, and correction of geometric distortion in 3 T MR images.

Authors:  Lesley N Baldwin; Keith Wachowicz; Steven D Thomas; Ryan Rivest; B Gino Fallone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A phantom study to assess the accuracy of stereotactic localization, using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with the Leksell stereotactic system.

Authors:  L Walton; A Hampshire; D M Forster; A A Kemeny
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Continuous table acquisition MRI for radiotherapy treatment planning: distortion assessment with a new extended 3D volumetric phantom.

Authors:  Amy Walker; Gary Liney; Lois Holloway; Jason Dowling; David Rivest-Henault; Peter Metcalfe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Magnetic resonance image-directed stereotactic neurosurgery: use of image fusion with computerized tomography to enhance spatial accuracy.

Authors:  E Alexander; H M Kooy; M van Herk; M Schwartz; P D Barnes; N Tarbell; R V Mulkern; E J Holupka; J S Loeffler
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Integration of magnetic resonance imaging into radiation therapy treatment planning: I. Technical considerations.

Authors:  B A Fraass; D L McShan; R F Diaz; R K Ten Haken; A Aisen; S Gebarski; G Glazer; A S Lichter
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  18 in total

1.  Characterization of hardware-related spatial distortions for IR-PETRA pulse sequence using a brain specific phantom.

Authors:  Sima Ahmadian; Iraj Jabbari; Seyed Mehdi Bagherimofidi; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  MR-guided radiation therapy: transformative technology and its role in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Chia-Lin Tseng; James M Balter; Feifei Teng; Hemant A Parmar; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Characterization of spatial distortion in a 0.35 T MRI-guided radiotherapy system.

Authors:  John S Ginn; Nzhde Agazaryan; Minsong Cao; Umar Baharom; Daniel A Low; Yingli Yang; Yu Gao; Peng Hu; Percy Lee; James M Lamb
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Large field of view distortion assessment in a low-field MR-linac.

Authors:  Siamak P Nejad-Davarani; Joshua P Kim; Dongsu Du; Carri Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Image-based gradient non-linearity characterization to determine higher-order spherical harmonic coefficients for improved spatial position accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Paul T Weavers; Shengzhen Tao; Joshua D Trzasko; Yunhong Shu; Erik J Tryggestad; Jeffrey L Gunter; Kiaran P McGee; Daniel V Litwiller; Ken-Pin Hwang; Matt A Bernstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Gradient nonlinearity calibration and correction for a compact, asymmetric magnetic resonance imaging gradient system.

Authors:  S Tao; J D Trzasko; J L Gunter; P T Weavers; Y Shu; J Huston; S K Lee; E T Tan; M A Bernstein
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A novel and rapid approach to estimate patient-specific distortions based on mDIXON MRI.

Authors:  Steffen Weiss; Siamak Nejad-Davarani; Holger Eggers; Eliza Orasanu; Steffen Renisch; Carri Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Peter B Greer; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Synthetic 4D-CT of the thorax for treatment plan adaptation on MR-guided radiotherapy systems.

Authors:  Joshua N Freedman; Hannah E Bainbridge; Simeon Nill; David J Collins; Marc Kachelrieß; Martin O Leach; Fiona McDonald; Uwe Oelfke; Andreas Wetscherek
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Task group 284 report: magnetic resonance imaging simulation in radiotherapy: considerations for clinical implementation, optimization, and quality assurance.

Authors:  Carri K Glide-Hurst; Eric S Paulson; Kiaran McGee; Neelam Tyagi; Yanle Hu; James Balter; John Bayouth
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.