Literature DB >> 16757858

Accuracy of device-specific 2D and 3D image distortion correction algorithms for magnetic resonance imaging of the head provided by a manufacturer.

Christian P Karger1, Angelika Höss, Rolf Bendl, Valer Canda, Lothar Schad.   

Abstract

For the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in precision radiotherapy, image distortions must be reduced to a minimum to maintain geometrical accuracy. Recently, two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) algorithms for MRI-device-specific distortion corrections were developed by the manufacturers of MRI devices. A previously developed phantom (Karger C P et al 2003 Phys. Med. Biol. 48 211-21) was used to quantify and assess the size of geometrical image distortions before and after application of the 2D and 3D correction algorithm in the head region. Four different types of MRI devices with different gradient systems were measured. For comparison, measurements were also performed with two computed tomography (CT) devices. Mean distortions of up to 4.6+/-1.4 mm (maximum: 5.8 mm) were found prior to the correction. After the correction, the mean distortions were well below 2.0 mm in most cases. Distortions in the CT images were below or equal to 1.0 mm on average. Generally, the 3D algorithm produced comparable or better results than the 2D algorithm. The remaining distortions after the correction appear to be acceptable for fractionated radiotherapy.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16757858     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/12/N04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  17 in total

1.  Characterization of hardware-related spatial distortions for IR-PETRA pulse sequence using a brain specific phantom.

Authors:  Sima Ahmadian; Iraj Jabbari; Seyed Mehdi Bagherimofidi; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Treatment planning using MRI data: an analysis of the dose calculation accuracy for different treatment regions.

Authors:  Joakim H Jonsson; Magnus G Karlsson; Mikael Karlsson; Tufve Nyholm
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Image-based gradient non-linearity characterization to determine higher-order spherical harmonic coefficients for improved spatial position accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Paul T Weavers; Shengzhen Tao; Joshua D Trzasko; Yunhong Shu; Erik J Tryggestad; Jeffrey L Gunter; Kiaran P McGee; Daniel V Litwiller; Ken-Pin Hwang; Matt A Bernstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Distortion inherent to magnetic resonance imaging can lead to geometric miss in radiosurgery planning.

Authors:  Tyler M Seibert; Nathan S White; Gwe-Ya Kim; Vitali Moiseenko; Carrie R McDonald; Nikdokht Farid; Hauke Bartsch; Joshua Kuperman; Roshan Karunamuni; Deborah Marshall; Dominic Holland; Parag Sanghvi; Daniel R Simpson; Arno J Mundt; Anders M Dale; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01

5.  Phantom-based characterization of distortion on a magnetic resonance imaging simulator for radiation oncology.

Authors:  Ke Colin Huang; Yue Cao; Umar Baharom; James M Balter
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Prospective feasibility analysis of a novel off-line approach for MR-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Tilman Bostel; Asja Pfaffenberger; Stefan Delorme; Constantin Dreher; Gernot Echner; Peter Haering; Clemens Lang; Mona Splinter; Frederik Laun; Marco Müller; Oliver Jäkel; Jürgen Debus; Peter E Huber; Florian Sterzing; Nils H Nicolay
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Assessing the Dosimetric Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance-Generated Synthetic CT Images for Focal Brain VMAT Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Eric Paradis; Yue Cao; Theodore S Lawrence; Christina Tsien; Mary Feng; Karen Vineberg; James M Balter
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Accuracy of inverse treatment planning on substitute CT images derived from MR data for brain lesions.

Authors:  Joakim H Jonsson; Mohammad M Akhtari; Magnus G Karlsson; Adam Johansson; Thomas Asklund; Tufve Nyholm
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Systematisation of spatial uncertainties for comparison between a MR and a CT-based radiotherapy workflow for prostate treatments.

Authors:  Tufve Nyholm; Morgan Nyberg; Magnus G Karlsson; Mikael Karlsson
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Geometric accuracy of 3D coordinates of the Leksell stereotactic skull frame in 1.5 Tesla- and 3.0 Tesla-magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of three different fixation screw materials.

Authors:  Hisato Nakazawa; Yoshimasa Mori; Osamu Yamamuro; Masataka Komori; Yuta Shibamoto; Yukio Uchiyama; Takahiko Tsugawa; Masahiro Hagiwara
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.