Literature DB >> 24385345

The face inversion effect in infants is driven by high, and not low, spatial frequencies.

Karen R Dobkins1, Rachael Harms.   

Abstract

To investigate the mechanisms underlying development of upright face preferences in infants, the current study measured inversion effects for faces that were spatial frequency (SF) filtered, into low SF and high SF, with the notion that different SFs are analyzed by different visual mechanisms. For comparison to faces, we used object stimuli that consisted of pictures of strollers. In 4 month olds, 8 month olds, and adults, we measured the strength of the selective face inversion effect (sFIE), operationally defined as an upright over inverted looking preference that is greater for faces than objects. In Study 1, we employed unfiltered stimuli, and found a clear sFIE in both infants and adults. To determine what drove this sFIE, in Study 2, the sFIE was measured for low-SF and high-SF stimuli, with all stimuli being equated for visibility. For adults, the sFIE was equally strong for low-SF and high-SF stimuli. A different pattern was seen for infants. Infants exhibited a significantly greater sFIE for high-SF, than for low-SF, stimuli (and only for high SF was the sFIE significant). In fact, the strength of infants' upright face preference for high-SF stimuli was indistinguishable from that observed for unfiltered faces, indicating that in natural (unfiltered) stimuli, high SFs are sufficient to account for infants' upright face preferences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adults; development; face inversion effect; face processing; infants; objects; preference; spatial frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24385345      PMCID: PMC3880109          DOI: 10.1167/14.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  68 in total

1.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition.

Authors:  I Gauthier; P Skudlarski; J C Gore; A W Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutet; Charles Collin; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-10

3.  Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition.

Authors:  Charles A Collin; Chang Hong Liu; Nikolaus F Troje; Patricia A McMullen; Avi Chaudhuri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Newborns' face recognition is based on spatial frequencies below 0.5 cycles per degree.

Authors:  Adélaïde de Heering; Chiara Turati; Bruno Rossion; Hermann Bulf; Valérie Goffaux; Francesca Simion
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-01-18

5.  Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: the perceptual field hypothesis.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-09-10

6.  Recognition of the mother's face by six-month-old infants: a neurobehavioral study.

Authors:  M de Haan; C A Nelson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1997-04

7.  Contrast masking in human vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; J M Foley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1980-12

8.  Acuity and contrast sensitivity in 1-, 2-, and 3-month-old human infants.

Authors:  M S Banks; P Salapatek
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Evidence of a shift from featural to configural face processing in infancy.

Authors:  Gudrun Schwarzer; Nicola Zauner; Bianca Jovanovic
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2007-07

10.  Spatial frequency and face processing in children with autism and Asperger syndrome.

Authors:  Christine Deruelle; Cecilie Rondan; Bruno Gepner; Carole Tardif
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2004-04
View more
  7 in total

1.  The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces.

Authors:  Jessica Royer; Verena Willenbockel; Caroline Blais; Frédéric Gosselin; Sandra Lafortune; Josiane Leclerc; Daniel Fiset
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-02

2.  Age norms for grating acuity and contrast sensitivity measured by Lea tests in the first three years of life.

Authors:  Amal A Elgohary; Manal H Abuelela; Adel Alei Eldin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Effects of motion and audio-visual redundancy on upright and inverted face and feature preferences in 4-13-month old pre- and full-term NICU graduates.

Authors:  P M Kittler; S-Y Kim; M J Flory; H T T Phan; B Z Karmel; J M Gardner
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2020-05-18

4.  Selectivity of Face Perception to Horizontal Information over Lifespan (from 6 to 74 Year Old).

Authors:  Valérie Goffaux; Aude Poncin; Christine Schiltz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Developmental changes in ERP responses to spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Carlijn van den Boomen; Lisa M Jonkman; Petra H J M Jaspers-Vlamings; Janna Cousijn; Chantal Kemner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Exploring the Role of Spatial Frequency Information during Neural Emotion Processing in Human Infants.

Authors:  Sarah Jessen; Tobias Grossmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Sensitivity to trustworthiness cues in own- and other-race faces: The role of spatial frequency information.

Authors:  Valentina Silvestri; Martina Arioli; Elisa Baccolo; Viola Macchi Cassia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.