Literature DB >> 22521208

Cortical asymmetries in speech perception: what's wrong, what's right and what's left?

Carolyn McGettigan1, Sophie K Scott.   

Abstract

Over the past 30 years hemispheric asymmetries in speech perception have been construed within a domain-general framework, according to which preferential processing of speech is due to left-lateralized, non-linguistic acoustic sensitivities. A prominent version of this argument holds that the left temporal lobe selectively processes rapid/temporal information in sound. Acoustically, this is a poor characterization of speech and there has been little empirical support for a left-hemisphere selectivity for these cues. In sharp contrast, the right temporal lobe is demonstrably sensitive to specific acoustic properties. We suggest that acoustic accounts of speech sensitivities need to be informed by the nature of the speech signal and that a simple domain-general vs. domain-specific dichotomy may be incorrect.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22521208      PMCID: PMC4083255          DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  67 in total

1.  Adaptation to speaker's voice in right anterior temporal lobe.

Authors:  Pascal Belin; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study.

Authors:  T Zaehle; T Wüstenberg; M Meyer; L Jäncke
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Huan Luo; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Interaction of face and voice areas during speaker recognition.

Authors:  Katharina von Kriegstein; Andreas Kleinschmidt; Philipp Sterzer; Anne-Lise Giraud
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Left-hemisphere specialization for the processing of acoustic transients.

Authors:  I S Johnsrude; R J Zatorre; B A Milner; A C Evans
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-05-06       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Information in speech: observations on the perception of [s]-stop clusters.

Authors:  P J Bailey; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Rate of acoustic change may underlie hemispheric specialization for speech perception.

Authors:  J Schwartz; P Tallal
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-03-21       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Hemispheric asymmetry for spectral and temporal processing in the human antero-lateral auditory belt cortex.

Authors:  Marc Schönwiesner; Rudolf Rübsamen; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Laura L Colgin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Hemispheric asymmetries in speech perception: sense, nonsense and modulations.

Authors:  Stuart Rosen; Richard J S Wise; Shabneet Chadha; Eleanor-Jayne Conway; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  41 in total

1.  Neural correlates of audiotactile phonetic processing in early-blind readers: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Morteza Pishnamazi; Yasaman Nojaba; Habib Ganjgahi; Asie Amousoltani; Mohammad Ali Oghabian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Do temporal processes underlie left hemisphere dominance in speech perception?

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 3.  The neuroanatomic and neurophysiological infrastructure for speech and language.

Authors:  David Poeppel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Exploring the roles of spectral detail and intonation contour in speech intelligibility: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Jeong S Kyong; Sophie K Scott; Stuart Rosen; Timothy B Howe; Zarinah K Agnew; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  On the planum temporale lateralization in suprasegmental speech perception: evidence from a study investigating behavior, structure, and function.

Authors:  Franziskus Liem; Martina A Hurschler; Lutz Jäncke; Martin Meyer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Voice-sensitive brain networks encode talker-specific phonetic detail.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 7.  From speech and talkers to the social world: The neural processing of human spoken language.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing.

Authors:  Yune-Sang Lee; Nam Eun Min; Arthur Wingfield; Murray Grossman; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Dynamic speech representations in the human temporal lobe.

Authors:  Matthew K Leonard; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 10.  The neural processing of masked speech.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.