Literature DB >> 18685036

Bilateral speech comprehension reflects differential sensitivity to spectral and temporal features.

Jonas Obleser1, Frank Eisner, Sonja A Kotz.   

Abstract

Speech comprehension has been shown to be a strikingly bilateral process, but the differential contributions of the subfields of left and right auditory cortices have remained elusive. The hypothesis that left auditory areas engage predominantly in decoding fast temporal perturbations of a signal whereas the right areas are relatively more driven by changes of the frequency spectrum has not been directly tested in speech or music. This brain-imaging study independently manipulated the speech signal itself along the spectral and the temporal domain using noise-band vocoding. In a parametric design with five temporal and five spectral degradation levels in word comprehension, a functional distinction of the left and right auditory association cortices emerged: increases in the temporal detail of the signal were most effective in driving brain activation of the left anterolateral superior temporal sulcus (STS), whereas the right homolog areas exhibited stronger sensitivity to the variations in spectral detail. In accordance with behavioral measures of speech comprehension acquired in parallel, change of spectral detail exhibited a stronger coupling with the STS BOLD signal. The relative pattern of lateralization (quantified using lateralization quotients) proved reliable in a jack-knifed iterative reanalysis of the group functional magnetic resonance imaging model. This study supplies direct evidence to the often implied functional distinction of the two cerebral hemispheres in speech processing. Applying direct manipulations to the speech signal rather than to low-level surrogates, the results lend plausibility to the notion of complementary roles for the left and right superior temporal sulci in comprehending the speech signal.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18685036      PMCID: PMC6670773          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1290-08.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  78 in total

1.  Humans mimicking animals: a cortical hierarchy for human vocal communication sounds.

Authors:  William J Talkington; Kristina M Rapuano; Laura A Hitt; Chris A Frum; James W Lewis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Inferior frontal gyrus activation predicts individual differences in perceptual learning of cochlear-implant simulations.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; Carolyn McGettigan; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Hearing thresholds and FMRI of auditory cortex following eighth cranial nerve surgery.

Authors:  Harold Burton; Jill B Firszt; Timothy Holden
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 4.  Using naturalistic utterances to investigate vocal communication processing and development in human and non-human primates.

Authors:  William J Talkington; Jared P Taglialatela; James W Lewis
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  An application of univariate and multivariate approaches in FMRI to quantifying the hemispheric lateralization of acoustic and linguistic processes.

Authors:  Carolyn McGettigan; Samuel Evans; Stuart Rosen; Zarinah K Agnew; Poonam Shah; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Encoding of spectral correlation over time in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Tobias Overath; Sukhbinder Kumar; Katharina von Kriegstein; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Quantifying the adequacy of neural representations for a cross-language phonetic discrimination task: prediction of individual differences.

Authors:  Rajeev D S Raizada; Feng-Ming Tsao; Huei-Mei Liu; Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 8.  A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading.

Authors:  Cathy J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Do temporal processes underlie left hemisphere dominance in speech perception?

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Neural responses to grammatically and lexically degraded speech.

Authors:  Alexa Bautista; Stephen M Wilson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.