Literature DB >> 15035338

Motor evoked potential monitoring for spinal cord and brain stem surgery.

F Sala1, P Lanteri, A Bricolo.   

Abstract

Intraoperative Neurophysiology (ION) has established itself as one of the means by which modern neurosurgery can improve surgical results while minimizing morbidity. The advent of motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring represents a landmark in this recent progress. ION consists of monitoring (the continuous "on-line" assessment of the functional integrity of neural pathways) and mapping (the functional identification and preservation of anatomically ambiguous nervous tissue) techniques. In this chapter we have attempted to critically review the evolution of MEP use during monitoring and mapping techniques for neurosurgical procedures in the brainstem and the spinal cord, providing the neurophysiological theoretical background and practical aspects of clinical applications. According to the experience from our and other groups involved in ION, we suggest the following: 1) ION is mandatory whenever neurological complications are expected as predicted by a known pathophysiological mechanism. It is therefore advisable to perform ION when dealing with brain stem and intramedullary spinal cord lesions. 2) MEP monitoring after transcranial electrical stimulation is today a feasible and reliable technique for use under general anesthesia. MEP monitoring is the most appropriate technique to assess the functional integrity of descending motor pathways in the brainstem and, foremost, in the spinal cord. 3) Mapping of the corticospinal tract at the level of the cerebral peduncle as well as mapping of the VII, IX-X and XII cranial nerve motor nuclei on the floor of the fourth ventricle is of great value with which to identify "safe entry zones" into the brainstem. 4) Other techniques, although safe and feasible, still lack rigorous validation in terms of prognostic value and correlation with the postoperative neurological outcome. These techniques include mapping of the corticospinal tract within the spinal cord and monitoring of the corticobulbar tracts. These techniques, however, are expected to open new perspectives in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15035338     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0558-0_4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg        ISSN: 0095-4829


  8 in total

Review 1.  Multimodal intraoperative monitoring: an overview and proposal of methodology based on 1,017 cases.

Authors:  Martin Sutter; Andreas Eggspuehler; Alfred Muller; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during cervical spine surgical procedures in 246 patients.

Authors:  Andreas Eggspuehler; Martin A Sutter; Dieter Grob; Dezsö Jeszenszky; François Porchet; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Use of intra-operative stimulation of brainstem lesion target sites for frameless stereotactic biopsies.

Authors:  Jason Labuschagne; Denis Mutyaba; Jacques Nel; Claudia Casieri
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 4.  Surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: the role of intraoperative (neurophysiological) monitoring.

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Albino Bricolo; Franco Faccioli; Paola Lanteri; Massimo Gerosa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Combined motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation promotes corticospinal system functional and structural plasticity and motor function after injury.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; Alzahraa Amer; Daniel Ryan; John H Martin
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Intraoperative changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials predicting outcome in children with intramedullary spinal cord tumors.

Authors:  Jason S Cheng; Michael E Ivan; Christopher J Stapleton; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Nalin Gupta; Kurtis I Auguste
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Analysis of 1014 consecutive operative cases to determine the utility of intraoperative neurophysiological data.

Authors:  Namath Syed Hussain
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

8.  Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Pediatric Pelvic Tumors.

Authors:  Alessandro Crocoli; Cristina Martucci; Franco Randi; Viviana Ponzo; Alessandro Trucchi; Maria Debora De Pasquale; Carlo Efisio Marras; Alessandro Inserra
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.569

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.