Literature DB >> 26703300

Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer.

Jinhai Huang1, Giacomo Savini1, Fan Wu1, Xinxin Yu1, Jing Yang1, Ayong Yu1, Ye Yu1, Qinmei Wang2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the precision of ocular biometry with a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer (Aladdin) in healthy subjects and patients with cataracts.
SETTING: Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Eyes from healthy subjects and eyes from patients with cataracts were examined with the new interferometer. Axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), keratometry (K), and white-to-white (WTW) values were measured by 2 operators. The test-retest repeatability, coefficient of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to evaluate intraoperator repeatability. Different-operator comparison was analyzed with paired t tests and Bland-Altman plots to assess interoperator reproducibility.
RESULTS: Ninety-eight people were enrolled for this study, of which 52 eyes were from healthy subjects and 46 eyes were from patients with cataracts. The AL was the most repeatable and reproducible parameter. The ACD, K values, and WTW measurements were highly repeatable in healthy subjects with CoV less than 0.89% and ICC more than 0.94. However, in patients with cataracts, high repeatability could only be observed for AL, ACD, and K values, whereas WTW measurement had test-retest repeatability of 0.80 mm and an ICC of 0.795. Bland-Altman analysis also showed good agreement between the 2 operators for ocular component measurements, except that the WTW in patients with cataracts had wider 95% limits of agreement (range -0.88 to 0.95 mm).
CONCLUSION: The new biometer showed excellent intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility for AL, ACD, and K values measurements in both groups. The precision of WTW measurements was lower in patients with cataracts. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26703300     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of biometric measurements obtained by the Verion Image-Guided System versus the auto-refracto-keratometer.

Authors:  Cecilio Velasco-Barona; Guadalupe Cervantes-Coste; Erick Mendoza-Schuster; Claudia Corredor-Ortega; Nadia L Casillas-Chavarín; Alejandro Silva-Moreno; Manuel Garza-León; Roberto Gonzalez-Salinas
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparison of ocular parameters of two biometric measurement devices in highly myopic eyes.

Authors:  Xiao-Xiao Guo; Ran You; Shan-Shan Li; Xiu-Fen Yang; Lu Zhao; Fan Zhang; Yan-Ling Wang; Xi Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Evaluation of the repeatability of optical coherence tomography in patients with age-related cataract associated with dry eye.

Authors:  Fen Yang; Ying Chang; Lu Yang; Zhijie Jia; Jiewei Liu; Yan Wang
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.029

4.  Repeatability of total Keratometry and standard Keratometry by the IOLMaster 700 and comparison to total corneal astigmatism by Scheimpflug imaging.

Authors:  Giacomo Savini; Leonardo Taroni; Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello; Kenneth J Hoffer
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.456

5.  Determination of Personalized IOL-Constants for the Haigis Formula under Consideration of Measurement Precision.

Authors:  Simon Schröder; Christina Leydolt; Rupert Menapace; Timo Eppig; Achim Langenbucher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Intrasession repeatability of ocular anatomical measurements obtained with a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes.

Authors:  David P Piñero; Inmaculada Cabezos; Alberto López-Navarro; Dolores de Fez; María T Caballero; Vicente J Camps
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Accuracy of optical biometry combined with Placido disc corneal topography for intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Giacomo Savini; Kenneth J Hoffer; Piero Barboni; Nicole Balducci; Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello; Pietro Ducoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Precision of a new ocular biometer in eyes with cataract using swept source optical coherence tomography combined with Placido-disk corneal topography.

Authors:  Wenwen Wang; Yaxin Miao; Giacomo Savini; Colm McAlinden; Hao Chen; Qingjie Hu; Qinmei Wang; Jinhai Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  OCT Biometry (B-OCT): A New Method for Measuring Ocular Axial Dimensions.

Authors:  Bartosz L Sikorski; Pawel Suchon
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Yanjun Hua; Wei Qiu; Qiuyi Xiao; Qiang Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.