Literature DB >> 26701383

Boosting protein stability with the computational design of β-sheet surfaces.

Doo Nam Kim1, Timothy M Jacobs2, Brian Kuhlman1,3.   

Abstract

β-sheets often have one face packed against the core of the protein and the other facing solvent. Mutational studies have indicated that the solvent-facing residues can contribute significantly to protein stability, and that the preferred amino acid at each sequence position is dependent on the precise structure of the protein backbone and the identity of the neighboring amino acids. This suggests that the most advantageous methods for designing β-sheet surfaces will be approaches that take into account the multiple energetic factors at play including side chain rotamer preferences, van der Waals forces, electrostatics, and desolvation effects. Here, we show that the protein design software Rosetta, which models these energetic factors, can be used to dramatically increase protein stability by optimizing interactions on the surfaces of small β-sheet proteins. Two design variants of the β-sandwich protein from tenascin were made with 7 and 14 mutations respectively on its β-sheet surfaces. These changes raised the thermal midpoint for unfolding from 45°C to 64°C and 74°C. Additionally, we tested an empirical approach based on increasing the number of potential salt bridges on the surfaces of the β-sheets. This was not a robust strategy for increasing stability, as three of the four variants tested were unfolded.
© 2016 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rosetta molecular modeling program; charge zipper proteins; computational protein design; electrostatic interactions; protein stability; β-sheets

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26701383      PMCID: PMC4815415          DOI: 10.1002/pro.2869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  31 in total

1.  Designing protein beta-sheet surfaces by Z-score optimization.

Authors:  A G Street; D Datta; D B Gordon; S L Mayo
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2000-05-22       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Design of novel FN3 domains with high stability by a consensus sequence approach.

Authors:  Steven A Jacobs; Michael D Diem; Jinquan Luo; Alexey Teplyakov; Galina Obmolova; Thomas Malia; Gary L Gilliland; Karyn T O'Neil
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 1.650

4.  Protein stability and surface electrostatics: a charged relationship.

Authors:  Samantha S Strickler; Alexey V Gribenko; Alexander V Gribenko; Timothy R Keiffer; Jessica Tomlinson; Tracey Reihle; Vakhtang V Loladze; George I Makhatadze
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Supercharging proteins can impart unusual resilience.

Authors:  Michael S Lawrence; Kevin J Phillips; David R Liu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Folding and self-assembly of the TatA translocation pore based on a charge zipper mechanism.

Authors:  Torsten H Walther; Christina Gottselig; Stephan L Grage; Moritz Wolf; Attilio V Vargiu; Marco J Klein; Stefanie Vollmer; Sebastian Prock; Mareike Hartmann; Sergiy Afonin; Eva Stockwald; Hartmut Heinzmann; Olga V Nolandt; Wolfgang Wenzel; Paolo Ruggerone; Anne S Ulrich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Measurement of the beta-sheet-forming propensities of amino acids.

Authors:  D L Minor; P S Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Surface salt bridges stabilize the GCN4 leucine zipper.

Authors:  E J Spek; A H Bui; M Lu; N R Kallenbach
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Alternative computational protocols for supercharging protein surfaces for reversible unfolding and retention of stability.

Authors:  Bryan S Der; Christien Kluwe; Aleksandr E Miklos; Ron Jacak; Sergey Lyskov; Jeffrey J Gray; George Georgiou; Andrew D Ellington; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Computer-based redesign of a beta sandwich protein suggests that extensive negative design is not required for de novo beta sheet design.

Authors:  Xiaozhen Hu; Huanchen Wang; Hengming Ke; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.006

View more
  3 in total

1.  Practical Considerations for Atomistic Structure Modeling with Cryo-EM Maps.

Authors:  Doo Nam Kim; Dominik Gront; Karissa Y Sanbonmatsu
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 2.  Designing protein structures and complexes with the molecular modeling program Rosetta.

Authors:  Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Computer-based Engineering of Thermostabilized Antibody Fragments.

Authors:  Jiwon Lee; Bryan S Der; Christos S Karamitros; Wenzong Li; Nicholas M Marshall; Oana I Lungu; Aleksandr E Miklos; Jianqing Xu; Tae Hyun Kang; Chang-Han Lee; Bing Tan; Randall A Hughes; Sang Taek Jung; Gregory C Ippolito; Jeffrey J Gray; Yan Zhang; Brian Kuhlman; George Georgiou; Andrew D Ellington
Journal:  AIChE J       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.993

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.