Literature DB >> 26698312

Implant fracture under dynamic fatigue loading: influence of embedded angle and depth of implant.

Hiroaki Suzuki1, Yoshiaki Hata1, Fumihiko Watanabe2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between implant fracture under cyclic-fatigue loading at different embedding angles, embedding depths, and loading forces. Twenty-four cylinder-type implants 3.3 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length were used. Test specimens were 30 mm(3) resin blocks with one surfaces inclined at angles of either 5°, 10°, 15° and 20° and embedded vertically with implants at depths of either 5 or 10 mm to the these surfaces. A straight abutment was connected to the implant and cut to 5 mm in length, and a hemispherical crown 5 mm in diameter and 7 mm in length was cast with a 12 % gold-silver-palladium alloy and cemented onto the abutment. Each specimen was mounted onto a fatigue loading device to apply repeated vertical loads of 294, 392, and 490 N to the coronal edge of the crown 60 times per min until reaching 100,000 cycles. For each respective specimen, we recorded the combined conditions of embedding and loading forces and the number of loading cycles until fracture, and then observed the fracture sites microscopically. The number of loading cycles until implant fracture tended to decrease in proportion to increased loading forces and embedded angles, and decreased embedded depths. Implant fracture was observed at angles of inclination over 10°. For specimens with an implant embedded at a depth of 5 mm, almost all fractures occurred at the center of the implant body; however, for those embedded at a depth of 10 mm, fractures occurred at the interface between the implant body and the abutment. These results demonstrate that implant fracture is associated with the loading axis, the amount of loading, and the embedded depth of the implant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bending force; Cyclic-fatigue loading; Implant axis; Implant fracture; Loading angle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26698312     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-015-0228-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  15 in total

1.  Fatigue resistance of ITI implant-abutment connectors -- a comparison of the standard cone with a novel internally keyed design.

Authors:  Jean Perriard; W Anselm Wiskott; Aissa Mellal; Susanne S Scherrer; John Botsis; Urs C Belser
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 2.  Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants.

Authors:  C J Goodacre; J Y Kan; K Rungcharassaeng
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered.

Authors:  G A Zarb; A Schmitt
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Evaluation of loading conditions on fatigue-failed implants by fracture surface analysis.

Authors:  Haw-Ming Huang; Chih-Mong Tsai; Cheng-Chung Chang; Che-Tong Lin; Sheng-Yang Lee
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  An analysis and management of fractured implants: a clinical report.

Authors:  T J Balshi
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Influence of the interface design on the yield force of the implant-abutment complex before and after cyclic mechanical loading.

Authors:  Marc Philipp Dittmer; Stephanie Dittmer; Lothar Borchers; Philipp Kohorst; Meike Stiesch
Journal:  J Prosthodont Res       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 4.642

7.  Analysis of incidence and associated factors with fractured implants: a retrospective study.

Authors:  S E Eckert; S J Meraw; E Cal; R K Ow
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis.

Authors:  B Rangert; P H Krogh; B Langer; N Van Roekel
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  Mechanical complications of dental implants.

Authors:  M S Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 10.  Fracture of dental implants: literature review and report of a case.

Authors:  Nirit Tagger Green; Eli E Machtei; Jacob Horwitz; Micha Peled
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.454

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of crown to implant ratio and implantoplasty on the fracture resistance of narrow dental implants with marginal bone loss: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Bruno Leitão-Almeida; Octavi Camps-Font; André Correia; Javier Mir-Mari; Rui Figueiredo; Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Does implantoplasty affect the failure strength of narrow and regular diameter implants? A laboratory study.

Authors:  Kristina Bertl; Flemming Isidor; Per Vult von Steyern; Andreas Stavropoulos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.573

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.