Literature DB >> 12453133

Fatigue resistance of ITI implant-abutment connectors -- a comparison of the standard cone with a novel internally keyed design.

Jean Perriard1, W Anselm Wiskott, Aissa Mellal, Susanne S Scherrer, John Botsis, Urs C Belser.   

Abstract

The Straumann Company has recently supplemented its standard 'morse-taper' configuration with an octagonal internal key. During the restorative phase of implant treatment, this additional feature was designed to ensure positional duplicability between the laboratory and the clinical environments. It was, however, unclear whether this keying mechanism would decrease the mechanical strength of the connection between the implant and the abutment. This applies to keyed male and female parts but also to combinations of the new and the standard designs. Specially constructed specimens analogs representing all three combinations were fitted with a T-shaped bar, preangled to 15 degrees and subjected to vertical force applications provided by a servohydrolic fatigue tester. The loading frequency was 2 Hz and the maximum cycle number was 106. The data were evaluated using the staircase technique. The specimens were also modeled and analyzed numerically using finite element procedures. The samples' failure locations were recorded and the displacement vs. cycle number plots were patterned in four groups. The fatigue tests and staircase analysis showed no difference in mechanical resistance between the standard and the internally keyed connectors. The finite element models revealed a stress concentration located at the apical edges of the octagonal connector. However, it appeared that this phenomenon was based on computational rather than mechanical grounds. The locations of the failure sites were distributed randomly across the structures, thereby indicating the absence of a locus of minor resistance. The patterns of the displacement vs. cycle number could not be attributed to specific combinations between the standard and the internally keyed designs. It was concluded that both connectors are equal in their mechanical resistance to bending and torquing forces.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12453133     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130515.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  9 in total

1.  Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments.

Authors:  Izabela Cristina Maurício Moris; Adriana Cláudia Lapria Faria; Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos; Ricardo Faria Ribeiro; Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Implant fracture under dynamic fatigue loading: influence of embedded angle and depth of implant.

Authors:  Hiroaki Suzuki; Yoshiaki Hata; Fumihiko Watanabe
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Biomechanical evaluations of the long-term stability of dental implant using finite element modeling method: a systematic review.

Authors:  Seyed Aref Hosseini-Faradonbeh; Hamid Reza Katoozian
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 1.989

Review 4.  Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer; Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva; Liliane da Rocha Bonatto; Daniela Micheline dos Santos
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-25

5.  The change of rotational freedom following different insertion torques in three implant systems with implant driver.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Kwon; Chong-Hyun Han; Sun-Jai Kim; Jae-Seung Chang
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Compressive fatigue in titanium dental implants submitted to fluoride ions action.

Authors:  Ana Lúcia Roselino Ribeiro; Jorge Roberto Noriega; Fábio Roberto Dametto; Luís Geraldo Vaz
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Stress on external hexagon and Morse taper implants submitted to immediate loading.

Authors:  Caroline H Odo; Marcele J Pimentel; Rafael L X Consani; Marcelo F Mesquita; Mauro A A Nóbilo
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-07-29

Review 8.  Morse taper dental implants and platform switching: The new paradigm in oral implantology.

Authors:  José Paulo Macedo; Jorge Pereira; Brendan R Vahey; Bruno Henriques; Cesar A M Benfatti; Ricardo S Magini; José López-López; Júlio C M Souza
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 9.  Finite element analysis of dental implants with validation: to what extent can we expect the model to predict biological phenomena? A literature review and proposal for classification of a validation process.

Authors:  Yuanhan Chang; Abhijit Anil Tambe; Yoshinobu Maeda; Masahiro Wada; Tomoya Gonda
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-03-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.