Literature DB >> 34539273

Less Invasive Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery: The Case for Robotic-Assisted Placement of Pedicle Screws.

Kyle W Morse1, Hila Otremski2, Kira Page1, Roger F Widmann1.   

Abstract

Introduction: Pediatric spinal deformity involves a complex 3-dimensional (3D) deformity that increases the risk of pedicle screw placement due to the close proximity of neurovascular structures. To increase screw accuracy, improve patient safety, and minimize surgical complications, the placement of pedicle screws is evolving from freehand techniques to computer-assisted navigation and to the introduction of robotic-assisted placement. Purpose: The aim of this review was to review the current literature on the use of robotic navigation in pediatric spinal deformity surgery to provide both an error analysis of these techniques and to provide recommendations to ensure its safe application.
Methods: A narrative review was conducted in April 2021 using the MEDLINE (PubMed) database. Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed retrospective or prospective studies, included pediatric patients, included a primary diagnosis of pediatric spine deformity, utilized robotic-assisted spinal surgery techniques, and reported thoracic or lumbar pedicle screw breach rates or pedicle screw malpositioning.
Results: In the few studies published on the use of robotic techniques in pediatric spinal deformity surgery, several found associations between the technology and increased rates of screw placement accuracy, reduced rates of breach, and minimal complications. All were retrospective studies. Conclusions: Current literature is of a low level of evidence; nonetheless, the findings suggest the accuracy and safety of robotic-assisted spinal surgery in pediatric pedicle screw placement. The introduction of robotics may drive further advances in less invasive pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Further study is warranted.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mini-incision surgery; operative treatments; pediatrics; robotics; scoliosis; spine

Year:  2021        PMID: 34539273      PMCID: PMC8436344          DOI: 10.1177/15563316211027828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  56 in total

1.  Correlation between low triggered electromyographic thresholds and lumbar pedicle screw malposition: analysis of 4857 screws.

Authors:  Barry L Raynor; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Brett A Taylor; Anne M Padberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Mid-term to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Rebecca Rosemann; Bhavraj Khalsa; Eli M Baron
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Daniel M Schwartz; Joshua D Auerbach; John P Dormans; John Flynn; Denis S Drummond; J Andrew Bowe; Samuel Laufer; Suken A Shah; J Richard Bowen; Peter D Pizzutillo; Kristofer J Jones; Denis S Drummond
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Prevalence, Distribution, and Surgical Relevance of Abnormal Pedicles in Spines with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis vs. No Deformity: A CT-Based Study.

Authors:  Vishal Sarwahi; Etan P Sugarman; Adam L Wollowick; Terry D Amaral; Yungtai Lo; Beverly Thornhill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Eli M Baron; Gowriharan Thaiyananthan; Kunwar Khalsa; Theodore B Goldstein
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2008-10

Review 6.  Does image guidance decrease pedicle screw-related complications in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review update and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Chan; Eric Parent; Jason Wong; Karl Narvacan; Cindy San; Edmond Lou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Khoi D Than; Praveen V Mummaneni; Kelly J Bridges; Stacie Tran; Paul Park; Dean Chou; Frank La Marca; Juan S Uribe; Todd D Vogel; Pierce D Nunley; Robert K Eastlack; Neel Anand; David O Okonkwo; Adam S Kanter; Gregory M Mundis
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 8.  Accuracy and Safety of Pedicle Screw Placement in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients: A Review of 2020 Screws Using Computed Tomography Assessment.

Authors:  Mun Keong Kwan; Chee Kidd Chiu; Siti Mariam Abd Gani; Chris Chan Yin Wei
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery: History, Efficacy, Cost, And Future Trends.

Authors:  Marissa D'Souza; Julian Gendreau; Austin Feng; Lily H Kim; Allen L Ho; Anand Veeravagu
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2019-11-07

10.  Minimally Invasive Scoliosis Surgery Is a Feasible Option for Management of Idiopathic Scoliosis and Has Equivalent Outcomes to Open Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Abduljabbar Alhammoud; Yahya Alborno; Abdul Moeen Baco; Yahya Azhar Othman; Yoji Ogura; Michael Steinhaus; Evan D Sheha; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.