Literature DB >> 35025073

Vertebrae segmentation in reduced radiation CT imaging for augmented reality applications.

Ethan Schonfeld1, Madeleine de Lotbiniere-Bassett2,3, Tatiana Jansen4, Diana Anthony4, Anand Veeravagu5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is growing evidence for the use of augmented reality (AR) navigation in spinal surgery to increase surgical accuracy and improve clinical outcomes. Recent research has employed AR techniques to create accurate auto-segmentations, the basis of patient registration, using reduced radiation dose intraoperative computed tomography images. In this study, we aimed to determine if spinal surgery AR applications can employ reduced radiation dose preoperative computed tomography (pCT) images.
METHODS: We methodically decreased the imaging dose, with the addition of Gaussian noise, that was introduced into pCT images to determine the image quality threshold that was required for auto-segmentation. The Gaussian distribution's standard deviation determined noise level, such that a scalar multiplier (L: [0.00, 0.45], with steps of 0.03) simulated lower doses as L increased. We then enhanced the images with denoising algorithms to evaluate the effect on the segmentation.
RESULTS: The pCT radiation dose was decreased to below the current lowest clinical threshold and the resulting images produced segmentations that were appropriate for input into AR applications. This held true at simulated dose L = 0.06 (estimated 144 mAs) but not at L = 0.09 (estimated 136 mAs). The application of denoising algorithms to the images resulted in increased artifacts and decreased bone density.
CONCLUSIONS: The pCT image quality that is required for AR auto-segmentation is lower than that which is currently employed in spinal surgery. We recommend a reduced radiation dose protocol of approximately 140 mAs. This has the potential to reduce the radiation experienced by patients in comparison to procedures without AR support. Future research is required to identify the specific, clinically relevant radiation dose thresholds required for surgical navigation.
© 2022. CARS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Augmented reality; Dose reduction; Radiation; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35025073     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-022-02561-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  20 in total

Review 1.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Qi-Shan Huang; Ping Zhou; Yang Zhou; Rui-Kai Wu; Yi Lou; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Computer navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided navigation for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Tong Meng; Xiao-Fei Guan; Hai-Long Zhang; Shi-Sheng He
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Safety and efficacy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography: consecutive series of 1148 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Mohamad Bydon; Risheng Xu; Anubhav G Amin; Mohamed Macki; Paul Kaloostian; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ali Bydon; Ziya L Gokaslan; Timothy F Witham
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-06-13

Review 4.  The utility of virtual reality and augmented reality in spine surgery.

Authors:  Joon S Yoo; Dillon S Patel; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Thomas S Brundage; Kern Singh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

5.  Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation in Spine Surgery to Minimize Staff Radiation Exposure.

Authors:  Erik Edström; Gustav Burström; Artur Omar; Rami Nachabe; Michael Söderman; Oscar Persson; Paul Gerdhem; Adrian Elmi-Terander
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Spinal navigation for minimally invasive thoracic and lumbosacral spine fixation: implications for radiation exposure, operative time, and accuracy of pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  T Tajsic; K Patel; R Farmer; R J Mannion; R A Trivedi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Implementation of augmented reality support in spine surgery.

Authors:  Barbara Carl; Miriam Bopp; Benjamin Saß; Benjamin Voellger; Christopher Nimsky
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A prospective multicenter registry on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral levels with the use of the O-arm imaging system and StealthStation Navigation.

Authors:  Erik Van de Kelft; F Costa; D Van der Planken; F Schils
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Pedicle Screw Placement Using Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation With Intraoperative 3D Imaging: A First In-Human Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Adrian Elmi-Terander; Gustav Burström; Rami Nachabe; Halldor Skulason; Kyrre Pedersen; Michael Fagerlund; Fredrik Ståhl; Anastasios Charalampidis; Michael Söderman; Staffan Holmin; Drazenko Babic; Inge Jenniskens; Erik Edström; Paul Gerdhem
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Radiation dose and image quality comparison during spine surgery with two different, intraoperative 3D imaging navigation systems.

Authors:  Rami Nachabe; Keith Strauss; Beth Schueler; Mohamad Bydon
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.