Literature DB >> 26683900

Estimation of coronary wave intensity analysis using noninvasive techniques and its application to exercise physiology.

Christopher J Broyd1, Sukhjinder Nijjer2, Sayan Sen2, Ricardo Petraco2, Siana Jones3, Rasha Al-Lamee2, Nicolas Foin2, Mahmud Al-Bustami4, Amarjit Sethi4, Raffi Kaprielian4, Punit Ramrakha4, Masood Khan4, Iqbal S Malik4, Darrel P Francis2, Kim Parker2, Alun D Hughes3, Ghada W Mikhail4, Jamil Mayet2, Justin E Davies2.   

Abstract

Wave intensity analysis (WIA) has found particular applicability in the coronary circulation where it can quantify traveling waves that accelerate and decelerate blood flow. The most important wave for the regulation of flow is the backward-traveling decompression wave (BDW). Coronary WIA has hitherto always been calculated from invasive measures of pressure and flow. However, recently it has become feasible to obtain estimates of these waveforms noninvasively. In this study we set out to assess the agreement between invasive and noninvasive coronary WIA at rest and measure the effect of exercise. Twenty-two patients (mean age 60) with unobstructed coronaries underwent invasive WIA in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Immediately afterwards, noninvasive LAD flow and pressure were recorded and WIA calculated from pulsed-wave Doppler coronary flow velocity and central blood pressure waveforms measured using a cuff-based technique. Nine of these patients underwent noninvasive coronary WIA assessment during exercise. A pattern of six waves were observed in both modalities. The BDW was similar between invasive and noninvasive measures [peak: 14.9 ± 7.8 vs. -13.8 ± 7.1 × 10(4) W·m(-2)·s(-2), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC): 0.73, P < 0.01; cumulative: -64.4 ± 32.8 vs. -59.4 ± 34.2 × 10(2) W·m(-2)·s(-1), CCC: 0.66, P < 0.01], but smaller waves were underestimated noninvasively. Increased left ventricular mass correlated with a decreased noninvasive BDW fraction (r = -0.48, P = 0.02). Exercise increased the BDW: at maximum exercise peak BDW was -47.0 ± 29.5 × 10(4) W·m(-2)·s(-2) (P < 0.01 vs. rest) and cumulative BDW -19.2 ± 12.6 × 10(3) W·m(-2)·s(-1) (P < 0.01 vs. rest). The BDW can be measured noninvasively with acceptable reliably potentially simplifying assessments and increasing the applicability of coronary WIA.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artery; blood flow; hypertrophy; microcirculation; physiology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26683900      PMCID: PMC4778269          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00575.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  42 in total

1.  Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study.

Authors:  Sayan Sen; Javier Escaned; Iqbal S Malik; Ghada W Mikhail; Rodney A Foale; Rafael Mila; Jason Tarkin; Ricardo Petraco; Christopher Broyd; Richard Jabbour; Amarjit Sethi; Christopher S Baker; Micheal Bellamy; Mahmud Al-Bustami; David Hackett; Masood Khan; David Lefroy; Kim H Parker; Alun D Hughes; Darrel P Francis; Carlo Di Mario; Jamil Mayet; Justin E Davies
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Arterial pulse wave dynamics after percutaneous aortic valve replacement: fall in coronary diastolic suction with increasing heart rate as a basis for angina symptoms in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Justin E Davies; Sayan Sen; Chris Broyd; Nearchos Hadjiloizou; John Baksi; Darrel P Francis; Rodney A Foale; Kim H Parker; Alun D Hughes; Andrew Chukwuemeka; Roberto Casula; Iqbal S Malik; Ghada W Mikhail; Jamil Mayet
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Wave reflection predicts cardiovascular events in hypertensive individuals independent of blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors: an ASCOT (Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcome Trial) substudy.

Authors:  Charlotte Manisty; Jamil Mayet; Robyn J Tapp; Kim H Parker; Peter Sever; Neil R Poulter; Neil H Poulter; Simon A McG Thom; Alun D Hughes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Evaluation of a novel sphygmomanometer, which estimates central aortic blood pressure from analysis of brachial artery suprasystolic pressure waves.

Authors:  Aaron C W Lin; Andrew Lowe; Karishma Sidhu; Wil Harrison; Peter Ruygrok; Ralph Stewart
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  Coronary flow reserve during dipyridamole stress echocardiography predicts mortality.

Authors:  Lauro Cortigiani; Fausto Rigo; Sonia Gherardi; Francesco Bovenzi; Sabrina Molinaro; Eugenio Picano; Rosa Sicari
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-11

6.  Differences in the magnitude of wave reflection account for differential effects of amlodipine- versus atenolol-based regimens on central blood pressure: an Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcome Trial substudy.

Authors:  Charlotte H Manisty; Andrew Zambanini; Kim H Parker; Justin E Davies; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet; Simon A McG Thom; Alun D Hughes
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Synergistic adaptations to exercise in the systemic and coronary circulations that underlie the warm-up angina phenomenon.

Authors:  Timothy P E Lockie; M Cristina Rolandi; Antoine Guilcher; Divaka Perera; Kalpa De Silva; Rupert Williams; Kaleab N Asrress; Kiran Patel; Sven Plein; Phil Chowienczyk; Maria Siebes; Simon R Redwood; Michael S Marber
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Improvement in coronary blood flow velocity with acute biventricular pacing is predominantly due to an increase in a diastolic backward-travelling decompression (suction) wave.

Authors:  Andreas Kyriacou; Zachary I Whinnett; Sayan Sen; Punam A Pabari; Ian Wright; Richard Cornelussen; David Lefroy; D Wyn Davies; Nicholas S Peters; Prapa Kanagaratnam; Jamil Mayet; Alun D Hughes; Darrel P Francis; Justin E Davies
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Comparison of the SphygmoCor and Omron devices in the estimation of pressure amplification against the invasive catheter measurement.

Authors:  Feng-Hua Ding; Yan Li; Rui-Yan Zhang; Qi Zhang; Ji-Guang Wang
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  Coronary wave energy: a novel predictor of functional recovery after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kalpa De Silva; Paul Foster; Antoine Guilcher; Asela Bandara; Roy Jogiya; Tim Lockie; Phil Chowiencyzk; Eike Nagel; Michael Marber; Simon Redwood; Sven Plein; Divaka Perera
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 6.546

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Targeting the dominant mechanism of coronary microvascular dysfunction with intracoronary physiology tests.

Authors:  Hernán Mejía-Rentería; Nina van der Hoeven; Tim P van de Hoef; Julius Heemelaar; Nicola Ryan; Amir Lerman; Niels van Royen; Javier Escaned
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Major influence of a 'smoke and mirrors' effect caused by wave reflection on early diastolic coronary arterial wave intensity.

Authors:  Jonathan P Mynard; Daniel J Penny; Joseph J Smolich
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Non-invasive coronary wave intensity analysis.

Authors:  Christopher J Broyd; Fausto Rigo; Justin Davies
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Diastolic-systolic velocity ratio to detect coronary stenoses under physiological resting conditions: a mechanistic study.

Authors:  Guus A de Waard; Christopher J Broyd; Christopher M Cook; Nina W van der Hoeven; Ricardo Petraco; Sukhjinder S Nijjer; Tim P van de Hoef; Mauro Echavarria-Pinto; Martijn Meuwissen; Sayan Sen; Paul Knaapen; Javier Escaned; Jan J Piek; Niels van Royen; Justin E Davies
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-03-01

5.  Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived coronary wave intensity analysis.

Authors:  Claire E Raphael; Jennifer Keegan; Kim H Parker; Robin Simpson; Julian Collinson; Vass Vassiliou; Ricardo Wage; Peter Drivas; Stephen Strain; Robert Cooper; Ranil de Silva; Rod H Stables; Carlo Di Mario; Michael Frenneaux; Dudley J Pennell; Justin E Davies; Alun D Hughes; David Firmin; Sanjay K Prasad
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.364

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.