Literature DB >> 21911781

Arterial pulse wave dynamics after percutaneous aortic valve replacement: fall in coronary diastolic suction with increasing heart rate as a basis for angina symptoms in aortic stenosis.

Justin E Davies1, Sayan Sen, Chris Broyd, Nearchos Hadjiloizou, John Baksi, Darrel P Francis, Rodney A Foale, Kim H Parker, Alun D Hughes, Andrew Chukwuemeka, Roberto Casula, Iqbal S Malik, Ghada W Mikhail, Jamil Mayet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis causes angina despite unobstructed arteries. Measurement of conventional coronary hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing valvular surgery has failed to explain these symptoms. With the advent of percutaneous aortic valve replacement (PAVR) and developments in coronary pulse wave analysis, it is now possible to instantaneously abolish the valvular stenosis and to measure the resulting changes in waves that direct coronary flow. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity were measured immediately before and after PAVR in 11 patients with unobstructed coronary arteries. Using coronary pulse wave analysis, we calculated the intracoronary diastolic suction wave (the principal accelerator of coronary blood flow). To test physiological reserve to increased myocardial demand, we measured at resting heart rate and during pacing at 90 and 120 bpm. Before PAVR, the basal myocardial suction wave intensity was 1.9±0.3×10(-5) W · m(-2) · s(-2), and this increased in magnitude with increasing severity of aortic stenosis (r=0.59, P=0.05). This wave decreased markedly with increasing heart rate (β coefficient=-0.16×10(-4) W · m(-2) · s(-2); P<0.001). After PAVR, despite a fall in basal suction wave (1.9±0.3 versus 1.1±0.1×10(-5) W · m(-2) · s(-2); P=0.02), there was an immediate improvement in coronary physiological reserve with increasing heart rate (β coefficient=0.9×10(-3) W · m(-2) · s(-2); P=0.014).
CONCLUSIONS: In aortic stenosis, the coronary physiological reserve is impaired. Instead of increasing when heart rate rises, the coronary diastolic suction wave decreases. Immediately after PAVR, physiological reserve returns to a normal positive pattern. This may explain how aortic stenosis can induce anginal symptoms and their prompt relief after PAVR. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01118442.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21911781     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.011916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  27 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter aortic valve insertion (TAVI): a review.

Authors:  B Clayton; G Morgan-Hughes; C Roobottom
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Coronary Revascularisation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Candidates: Why, Who, When?

Authors:  Davide Cao; Mauro Chiarito; Paolo Pagnotta; Bernhard Reimers; Giulio G Stefanini
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-05

Review 3.  Targeting the dominant mechanism of coronary microvascular dysfunction with intracoronary physiology tests.

Authors:  Hernán Mejía-Rentería; Nina van der Hoeven; Tim P van de Hoef; Julius Heemelaar; Nicola Ryan; Amir Lerman; Niels van Royen; Javier Escaned
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Major influence of a 'smoke and mirrors' effect caused by wave reflection on early diastolic coronary arterial wave intensity.

Authors:  Jonathan P Mynard; Daniel J Penny; Joseph J Smolich
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Assessment, treatment, and prognostic implications of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI.

Authors:  Edward Danson; Peter Hansen; Sayan Sen; Justin Davies; Ian Meredith; Ravinay Bhindi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Coronary microvascular dysfunction in the clinical setting: from mystery to reality.

Authors:  Joerg Herrmann; Juan Carlos Kaski; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Coronary wave intensity during the Valsalva manoeuvre in humans reflects altered intramural vessel compression responsible for extravascular resistance.

Authors:  M Cristina Rolandi; Froukje Nolte; Tim P van de Hoef; Maurice Remmelink; Jan Baan; Jan J Piek; Jos A E Spaan; Maria Siebes
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Estimation of coronary wave intensity analysis using noninvasive techniques and its application to exercise physiology.

Authors:  Christopher J Broyd; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Sayan Sen; Ricardo Petraco; Siana Jones; Rasha Al-Lamee; Nicolas Foin; Mahmud Al-Bustami; Amarjit Sethi; Raffi Kaprielian; Punit Ramrakha; Masood Khan; Iqbal S Malik; Darrel P Francis; Kim Parker; Alun D Hughes; Ghada W Mikhail; Jamil Mayet; Justin E Davies
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 9.  Challenges in Diagnosis and Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Srdjan Aleksandric; Marko Banovic; Branko Beleslin
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-11

10.  Validation of high temporal resolution spiral phase velocity mapping of temporal patterns of left and right coronary artery blood flow against Doppler guidewire.

Authors:  Jennifer Keegan; Claire E Raphael; Kim Parker; Robin M Simpson; Stephen Strain; Ranil de Silva; Carlo Di Mario; Julian Collinson; Rod H Stables; Ricardo Wage; Peter Drivas; Malindie Sugathapala; Sanjay K Prasad; David N Firmin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.