Literature DB >> 23153906

Coronary flow reserve during dipyridamole stress echocardiography predicts mortality.

Lauro Cortigiani1, Fausto Rigo, Sonia Gherardi, Francesco Bovenzi, Sabrina Molinaro, Eugenio Picano, Rosa Sicari.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the ability of coronary flow reserve (CFR) over regional wall motion to predict mortality in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).
BACKGROUND: CFR evaluated using pulsed Doppler echocardiography testing on left anterior descending artery is the state-of-the-art method during vasodilatory stress echocardiography.
METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter, observational study, we evaluated 4,313 patients (2,532 men; mean age 65 ± 11 years) with known (n = 1,547) or suspected (n = 2,766) CAD who underwent high-dose dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg over 6 min) stress echocardiography with CFR evaluation of left coronary descending artery (LAD) by Doppler. Overall mortality was the only endpoint analyzed.
RESULTS: Stress echocardiography was positive for ischemia in 765 (18%) patients. Mean CFR was 2.35 ± 0.68. At individual patient analysis, 1,419 (33%) individuals had CFR ≤2. During a median follow-up of 19 months (1st quartile 8; 3rd quartile 36), 146 patients died. The 4-year mortality was markedly higher in subjects with CFR ≤2 than in those with CFR >2, both considering the group with ischemia (39% vs. 7%; p < 0.0001) and the group without ischemia at stress echocardiography (12% vs. 3%; p < 0.0001). At multivariable analysis, CFR on LAD ≤2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.29 to 4.78; p < 0.0001), ischemia at stress echocardiography (HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.65 to 3.48, p < 0.0001), left bundle branch block (HR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.50 to 3.41; p < 0.0001), age (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.06-1.10; p < 0.0001), resting wall motion score index (HR: 3.52, 95% CI: 2.38 to 5.21; p < 0.0001), male sex (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.12 to 2.52; p = 0.003), and diabetes mellitus (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.03 to 2.08; p = 0.03) were independent predictors of mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: CFR on LAD is a strong and independent indicator of mortality, conferring additional prognostic value over wall motion analysis in patients with known or suspected CAD. A negative result on stress echocardiography with a normal CFR confers an annual risk of death <1% in both patient groups.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23153906     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  36 in total

1.  Neointimal coverage and vasodilator response to titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents and everolimus-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome: insights from the BASE-ACS trial.

Authors:  Pasi Karjalainen; Tuomas O Kiviniemi; Tuomas Lehtinen; Wail Nammas; Antti Ylitalo; Antti Saraste; Jussi Mikkelsson; Mikko Pietila; Fausto Biancari; Juhani K E Airaksinen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Stress echocardiography: what is new and how does it compare with myocardial perfusion imaging and other modalities?

Authors:  Marysia S Tweet; Adelaide M Arruda-Olson; Nandan S Anavekar; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Guest Editorial: Controversies in Fractional Flow Reserve.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Scali; Doralisa Morrone; Mario Marzilli
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2016-12

4.  Drop-off in positivity rate of stress echocardiography based on regional wall motion abnormalities over the last three decades.

Authors:  Lauro Cortigiani; Pamela Ramirez; Maico Coltelli; Francesco Bovenzi; Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Coronary responses to cold air inhalation following afferent and efferent blockade.

Authors:  Matthew D Muller; Zhaohui Gao; Patrick M McQuillan; Urs A Leuenberger; Lawrence I Sinoway
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Coronary flow reserve in patients with resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Sebastian Völz; Sara Svedlund; Bert Andersson; Gan Li-Ming; Bengt Rundqvist
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 7.  Assessing the Haemodynamic Impact of Coronary Artery Stenoses: Intracoronary Flow Versus Pressure Measurements.

Authors:  Valérie E Stegehuis; Gilbert Wm Wijntjens; Tadashi Murai; Jan J Piek; Tim P van de Hoef
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2018-08

Review 8.  Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Assessment with Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography.

Authors:  Iana Simova
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2015-07

9.  Myocardial strain indices and coronary flow reserve are only mildly affected in healthy hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Dimitrios Evangelou; Aris Bechlioulis; Georgios Tzeltzes; Lampros Lakkas; Ioanna Theodorou; Rigas Kalaitzidis; Evangelia Dounousi; Lampros K Michalis; Katerina K Naka
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Coronary Artery Imaging with Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography.

Authors:  Masaaki Takeuchi; Akemi Nakazono
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.