Literature DB >> 2958630

Comparison of detection procedures for Chlamydia trachomatis, including enzyme immunoassays, in a mouse model of genital infection.

D Taylor-Robinson1, M Tuffrey.   

Abstract

Two chlamydial enzyme immunoassays, Chlamydiazyme and IDEIA, were evaluated in a mouse model of chlamydial genital-tract infection. The Chlamydiazyme assay and the IDEIA were assessed on specimens from 10 and 11 mice, respectively. The animals were infected with Chlamydia trachomatis, strain SA2f, and the results obtained by these methods on vaginal specimens taken on 4 or 5 occasions during 41-42 days were compared with those obtained in cell culture and to a less extent by the MicroTrak direct immunofluorescence test. In comparison with culture, the Chlamydiazyme assay had a sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 92%; IDEIA had a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 94%. These assays sometimes did not detect chlamydiae in specimens taken immediately before specimens which proved positive by culture and the immunoassays were less sensitive if swabs were taken after those for culture. The IDEIA also failed to detect chlamydiae in the late stage of the murine infection when chlamydial elementary bodies were seen by immunofluorescence. The implications of the observations for investigations in the human field as well as for further studies in the mouse are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2958630     DOI: 10.1099/00222615-24-2-169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  6 in total

1.  The value of urine samples from men with non-gonococcal urethritis for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  P E Hay; B J Thomas; C Gilchrist; H M Palmer; C B Gilroy; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-04

Review 2.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

3.  Comparison of IDEIA III and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.

Authors:  W D Lebar; H Schubiner; C Jemal; B R Herschman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of three Chlamydia trachomatis immunoassays with an unbiased, noninvasive clinical sample.

Authors:  I D Paul; E O Caul
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Improved sensitivity of an enzyme immunoassay IDEIA for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  B J Thomas; M F Osborn; C Gilchrist; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Comparison of three non-culture techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens.

Authors:  C J Hall; C Nelder
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.267

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.