Literature DB >> 26682168

A comparison of visual outcomes in three different types of monofocal intraocular lenses.

Vijay Shetty1, Suhas S Haldipurkar1, Rujuta Gore1, Rita Dhamankar1, Anirban Paik1, Maninder Singh Setia1.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the visual outcomes (distance and near) in patients opting for three different types of monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) (Matrix Aurium, AcrySof single piece, and AcrySof IQ lens).
METHODS: The present study is a cross-sectional analysis of secondary clinical data collected from 153 eyes (52 eyes in Matrix Aurium, 48 in AcrySof single piece, and 53 in AcrySof IQ group) undergoing cataract surgery (2011-2012). We compared near vision, distance vision, distance corrected near vision in these three types of lenses on day 15 (±3) post-surgery.
RESULTS: About 69% of the eyes in the Matrix Aurium group had good uncorrected distance vision post-surgery; the proportion was 48% and 57% in the AcrySof single piece and AcrySof IQ group (P=0.09). The proportion of eyes with good distance corrected near vision were 38%, 33%, and 15% in the Matrix Aurium, AcrySof single piece, and AcrySof IQ groups respectively (P=0.02). Similarly, The proportion with good "both near and distance vision" were 38%, 33%, and 15% in the Matrix Aurium, AcrySof single piece, and AcrySof IQ groups respectively (P=0.02). It was only the Matrix Aurium group which had significantly better both "distance and near vision" compared with the AcrySof IQ group (odds ratio: 5.87, 95% confidence intervals: 1.68 to 20.56).
CONCLUSION: Matrix Aurium monofocal lenses may be a good option for those patients who desire to have a good near as well as distance vision post-surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cataract surgery; monofocal lenses; visual acuity

Year:  2015        PMID: 26682168      PMCID: PMC4651884          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.06.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  18 in total

1.  Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; David P Piñero; Ana B Plaza-Puche; Maria Joanna Rodriguez Chan
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Apparent accommodation and depth of field in pseudophakia.

Authors:  M J Elder; C Murphy; G F Sanderson
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Contrast sensitivity and depth of focus with aspheric multifocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  S Dadeya; S Kaushik
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.882

4.  Violet and blue light blocking intraocular lenses: photoprotection versus photoreception.

Authors:  M A Mainster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Foldable toric intraocular lens for astigmatism correction in cataract patients.

Authors:  Javier Mendicute; Cristina Irigoyen; Jaime Aramberri; Ana Ondarra; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Intraindividual comparison of a blue-light filter on visual function: AF-1 (UY) versus AF-1 (UV) intraocular lens.

Authors:  Ulrich Mester; Frank Holz; Thomas Kohnen; Chris Lohmann; Manfred Tetz
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Spherical aberration and depth of focus in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Karolinne Maia Rocha; Eduardo S Soriano; Wallace Chamon; Maria Regina Chalita; Walton Nosé
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Recent studies provide an updated clinical perspective on blue light-filtering IOLs.

Authors:  James A Davison; Anil S Patel; Joao P Cunha; Jim Schwiegerling; Orkun Muftuoglu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Prevalence of cataract in an older population in India: the India study of age-related eye disease.

Authors:  Praveen Vashist; Badrinath Talwar; Madhurjya Gogoi; Giovanni Maraini; Monica Camparini; Ravilla D Ravindran; Gudlavalleti V Murthy; Kathryn E Fitzpatrick; Neena John; Usha Chakravarthy; Thulasiraj D Ravilla; Astrid E Fletcher
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Prospective randomized study of clinical performance of 3 aspheric and 2 spherical intraocular lenses in 250 eyes.

Authors:  Aldo Caporossi; Gianluca Martone; Fabrizio Casprini; Lorenzo Rapisarda
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical Outcomes, Contrast Sensitivity, Reading Performance and Patient Satisfaction Following Bilateral Implantation of AT LARA 829MP EDoF IOLs.

Authors:  Sri Ganesh; Sheetal Brar; Nikhil Rp; Dishitha Rathod
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-21

Review 2.  Patient considerations in cataract surgery - the role of combined therapy using phenylephrine and ketorolac.

Authors:  Roberto Gonzalez-Salinas; Adriano Guarnieri; María Concepción Guirao Navarro; Manuel Saenz-de-Viteri
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.711

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.