Literature DB >> 21241905

Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation multifocal intraocular lens.

Jorge L Alió1, David P Piñero, Ana B Plaza-Puche, Maria Joanna Rodriguez Chan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare visual acuity outcomes and ocular and intraocular optical quality in patients with a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) or a multifocal IOL with rotational asymmetry.
SETTING: Vissum Corporation, Alicante, Spain.
DESIGN: Comparative case series.
METHODS: Consecutive eyes of cataract patients were divided into 2 groups. One group received a Lentis Mplus LS-312 multifocal IOL and the other, an Acri.Smart 48S monofocal IOL. Distance and near visual acuities, contrast sensitivity, intraocular aberrations (global minus corneal aberrations), and defocus curves were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively during a 3-month follow-up.
RESULTS: The study evaluated 52 eyes of 29 patients (age range 36 to 87 years); 24 eyes were in multifocal IOL group and 28 eyes, in the monofocal IOL group. Both groups had a significant improvement in uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities and in distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) postoperatively (P ≤ .04). The multifocal IOL group had significantly better uncorrected near acuity and DCNVA (Jaeger [J] 5 versus J2) (both P < .01). The defocus curves showed significantly better visual acuities in the multifocal group at several levels of defocus. The multifocal group had significantly higher amounts of postoperative intraocular primary coma (P<.01), especially in eyes with significant IOL tilt, although there were no significant differences in contrast sensitivity between the 2 IOL groups (P ≥ .25).
CONCLUSIONS: The new-generation multifocal IOL restored distance, intermediate, and near visual function after cataract surgery. The optical quality with this type of IOL was particularly affected by IOL tilt and decentration.
Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21241905     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  33 in total

1.  A comparison of visual outcomes in three different types of monofocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Vijay Shetty; Suhas S Haldipurkar; Rujuta Gore; Rita Dhamankar; Anirban Paik; Maninder Singh Setia
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Quality of vision, patient satisfaction and long-term visual function after bilateral implantation of a low addition multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Emilio Pedrotti; Rodolfo Mastropasqua; Jacopo Bonetto; Christian Demasi; Francesco Aiello; Carlo Nucci; Cesare Mariotti; Giorgio Marchini
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Impact of pupil transmission apodization on presbyopic through-focus visual performance with spherical aberration.

Authors:  Len Zheleznyak; HaeWon Jung; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Error induced by the estimation of the corneal power and the effective lens position with a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  David P Piñero; Vicente J Camps; María L Ramón; Verónica Mateo; Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  The role of sensory ocular dominance on through-focus visual performance in monovision presbyopia corrections.

Authors:  Len Zheleznyak; Aixa Alarcon; Kevin C Dieter; Duje Tadin; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Presbyopic lens exchange (PRELEX) cataract surgery outcomes with implantation of a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens: femtosecond laser-assisted versus manual phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Peter Žiak; Juraj Halička; Peter Mojžiš; Karolína Kapitánová; Javorka Michal; David P Piñero
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Comparison of visual outcomes and reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Özge Güngör Akkuş; Ikbal Seza Petriçli
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Comparative analysis of the visual and refractive outcomes of a refractive segmented multifocal intraocular lens with and without toricity: 1-year results.

Authors:  Ryo Shodai; Kazuno Negishi; Hiroyuki Arai; Ikuko Toda; Hidemasa Torii; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 9.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.

Authors:  Samantha R de Silva; Jennifer R Evans; Varo Kirthi; Mohammed Ziaei; Martin Leyland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-12

10.  [Clinical results after implantation of a new segmental refractive multifocal intraocular lens].

Authors:  B C Thomas; G U Auffarth; R Philips; J Novák; J Blazek; H Adamkova; T M Rabsilber
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.