Literature DB >> 11428528

Contrast sensitivity and depth of focus with aspheric multifocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lens.

S Dadeya, S Kaushik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laboratoires Domilens, Lyon, France, has introduced a new aspheric multifocal intraocular lens (IOL), the Progress 3. The central portion, measuring 4.7 mm in diameter, has an anterior surface of progressively increasing power, such that there is a central add of +5.00 dioptres. We compared contrast sensitivity and depth of focus in patients who received the Progress 3 and in those who received a conventional monofocal IOL.
METHODS: Prospective study. Forty patients with age-related cataract were randomly divided into two groups: 20 patients received the Progress 3 aspheric multifocal IOL, and 20 patients received a conventional monofocal IOL of similar design. Contrast sensitivity was measured with the Pelli-Robson letter-based chart. Depth of focus was determined by dialling a series of overcorrections over the patient's manifest refraction until the patient read 6/12 clearly. The depth of focus was defined as the range over which 6/12 or better acuity was achieved. Quality of vision was evaluated by patient questionnaire.
RESULTS: Mean contrast sensitivity was significantly lower in the patients with a multifocal IOL than in those with a monofocal IOL (1.38 vs. 1.56 log units) (p < 0.001). The mean depth of focus values for the two groups were 3.10 D and 1.65 D respectively (p < 0.001). The prevalence of subjective problems was similar in the two groups.
INTERPRETATION: In our opinion, aspheric multifocal IOLs should be reserved for patients who are willing to trade increased depth of focus for reduced contrast sensitivity postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11428528     DOI: 10.1016/s0008-4182(01)80040-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0008-4182            Impact factor:   1.882


  13 in total

1.  Paraxial analysis of the depth of field of a pseudophakic eye with accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jit B Ale; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  A comparison of visual outcomes in three different types of monofocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Vijay Shetty; Suhas S Haldipurkar; Rujuta Gore; Rita Dhamankar; Anirban Paik; Maninder Singh Setia
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  All-distance visual acuity in eyes with a nontinted or a yellow-tinted diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Miki Masumoto; Hideyuki Hayashi
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  The clinical depth of field achievable with trifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses: theoretical considerations and proof of concept clinical results.

Authors:  Ante Barišić; Sudi Patel; Nikica Gabric; Claes G Feinbaum
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Effectiveness of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery and lens replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sumitra S Khandelwal; Jason J Jun; Selene Mak; Marika Suttorp Booth; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Hikaru Ito; Yukari Ohori; Yui Takano; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Subjective and objective depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes: comparison between extended depth of focus, trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Carlos Palomino-Bautista; Rubén Sánchez-Jean; David Carmona-González; David P Piñero; Ainhoa Molina-Martín
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 8.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.

Authors:  Samantha R de Silva; Jennifer R Evans; Varo Kirthi; Mohammed Ziaei; Martin Leyland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-12

9.  Depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes implanted with different type of presbyopia-correcting IOLS.

Authors:  Carlos Palomino-Bautista; Rubén Sánchez-Jean; David Carmona-Gonzalez; David P Piñero; Ainhoa Molina-Martín
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Customized Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Adult Cataract in Iran.

Authors:  Zhaleh Rajavi; Mohammad Ali Javadi; Narsis Daftarian; Sare Safi; Farhad Nejat; Armin Shirvani; Hamid Ahmadieh; Saeid Shahraz; Hossein Ziaei; Hamidreza Moein; Behzad Fallahi Motlagh; Sepehr Feizi; Alireza Foroutan; Hassan Hashemi; Seyed Javad Hashemian; Mahmoud Jabbarvand; Mohammad Reza Jafarinasab; Farid Karimian; Hossein Mohammad-Rabei; Mehrdad Mohammadpour; Nader Nassiri; Mahmoodreza Panahi-Bazaz; Mohammad Reza Rohani; Mohammad Reza Sedaghat; Kourosh Sheibani
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.