Literature DB >> 17445897

Spherical aberration and depth of focus in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a prospective randomized study.

Karolinne Maia Rocha1, Eduardo S Soriano, Wallace Chamon, Maria Regina Chalita, Walton Nosé.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare distance-corrected, near, and intermediate visual acuities as a measurement of depth of focus and spherical aberration of eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses (IOLs).
DESIGN: Randomized prospective study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty eyes of 60 patients with bilateral cataract implanted with 3 IOL models (AcrySof IQ, AcrySof SN60AT [Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX], and Sensar AR40 [Allergan Surgical, Irvine, CA]).
METHODS: Pupil diameter was analyzed by using a Colvard pupillometer (OASIS Medical, Inc., Glendora, CA) under photopic, mesopic, and scotopic conditions. Distance (6 m), intermediate (1 m), and near (0.33 m) visual acuities were measured with distance correction in place 90 days after surgery. Wavefront analysis (LadarWave; Alcon Laboratories) was performed using 5-mm and measured photopic pupil diameter at 30 and 90 days after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To evaluate spherical aberration and depth of focus (by means of distance-corrected near and intermediate visual acuity) in patients implanted with aspheric and spherical IOLs.
RESULTS: Photopic pupil sizes in each group were similar at 30 days after surgery. At 90 days after surgery, mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution distance-corrected near visual acuity (+/-standard deviation [SD]) was 0.50+/-0.20 in the AcrySof IQ group, 0.38+/-0.17 in the AcrySof SN60AT group, and 0.45+/-0.16 in Sensar AR40 group. Mean spherical aberration values (+/-SD) were 0.03+/-0.05 microm in the AcrySof IQ group, 0.24+/-0.04 microm in the AcrySof SN60AT group, and 0.14+/-0.07 microm in the Sensar AR40 group. The AcrySof IQ group showed a statistically significant lower induction of spherical aberration and worse distance-corrected near visual acuity. The AcrySof SN60AT group showed statistically significant higher mean spherical aberration values and better distance-corrected near and intermediate visual acuity.
CONCLUSIONS: The reduction of total spherical aberration after aspheric IOL implantation may degrade distance-corrected near and intermediate visual acuity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17445897     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  21 in total

1.  Visual and optical performance of eyes with different corneal spherical aberration implanted with aspheric intraocular lens.

Authors:  Xian-Hui Gong; Qin-Xiang Zheng; Na Wang; Ding Chen; Juan Zhao; Jin Li; Yun-E Zhao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  A comparison of visual outcomes in three different types of monofocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Vijay Shetty; Suhas S Haldipurkar; Rujuta Gore; Rita Dhamankar; Anirban Paik; Maninder Singh Setia
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Comparison of contrast sensitivity, depth of field and ocular wavefront aberrations in eyes with an IOL with zero versus positive spherical aberration.

Authors:  Jay S Pepose; Mujtaba A Qazi; Keith H Edwards; Jeff P Sanderson; Edwin J Sarver
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Optical quality of aspheric toric intraocular lenses at different degrees of decentering.

Authors:  Cari Pérez-Vives; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; David Madrid-Costa; Santiago García-Lázaro; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Higher order aberration comparison between two aspherical intraocular lenses: MC6125AS and Akreos advanced optics.

Authors:  Mohammad Taher Rajabi; Sara Korouji; Mahgol Farjadnia; Mohammad Naderan; Mohammad Bagher Rajabi; Bahram Khosravi; Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaie
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Visual performance with accommodating and multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Jie Lan; Yu-Sen Huang; Yun-Hai Dai; Xiao-Ming Wu; Jia-Jun Sun; Li-Xin Xie
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Temporal multiplexing with adaptive optics for simultaneous vision.

Authors:  Eleni Papadatou; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Iván Marín-Franch; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Objective evaluation of through-focus optical performance of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses using an optical bench system.

Authors:  Myoung Joon Kim; Len Zheleznyak; Scott Macrae; Hungwon Tchah; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Can we measure mesopic pupil size with the cobalt blue light slit-lamp biomicroscopy method?

Authors:  Miguel J Maldonado; Alberto López-Miguel; David P Piñero; José R Juberías; Juan C Nieto; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 10.  [Aspheric intraocular lenses].

Authors:  T Kohnen; O K Klaproth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.174

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.