Literature DB >> 26682136

Daily patient setup error in prostate image guided radiation therapy with fiducial-based kilovoltage onboard imaging and conebeam computed tomography.

Jason C Ye1, Muhammad M Qureshi1, Pauline Clancy1, Lauren N Dise1, John Willins1, Ariel E Hirsch1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examined the interfraction setup error in patients undergoing prostate radiotherapy using fiducial markers and on-board imaging.
METHODS: Patients (n=53) were aligned to the treatment isocenter by laser followed by orthogonal kilovoltage (kV) radiographs to visualize bony anatomy and implanted fiducial markers. The magnitude and direction of couch shifts for isocenter correction required was determined by image registration for bony anatomy and fiducial markers. Twice weekly, 25 of the 53 patients also underwent conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) to measure any residual error in patient positioning. Based on individual coordinate shifts from CBCT, a net three-dimensional (3D) residual shift magnitude vector R was calculated.
RESULTS: The average couch shifts were 0.26 and 0.40 cm in inferior direction and 0.25 and 0.33 cm in superior direction for alignments made with bony anatomy and fiducial markers, respectively (P<0.0001). There were no significant differences noted in the vertical or lateral planes between the two image registration methods. In subset of 25 patients, no residual shift from fiducial plain film set up was required with CBCT matching in 66.5%, 52.4% and 57.9% of fractions for longitudinal, vertical and lateral planes, respectively, with majority (79%) of patients having a net residual 3D shifts of <0.3 cm. The use of CBCT increased average treatment time by approximately 6 min compared to kV radiographs alone.
CONCLUSIONS: The residual setup errors following daily kV image guided localization, as determined by CBCT, were small, which demonstrates high accuracy of kV localization when fiducial markers are present.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conebeam computed tomography (CBCT); fiducial markers; image guided radiation therapy (IGRT); prostate cancer

Year:  2015        PMID: 26682136      PMCID: PMC4671976          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2015.10.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  21 in total

Review 1.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: current status and issues of interest.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  David A Jaffray; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; John W Wong; Alvaro A Martinez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Overview of image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Lei Xing; Brian Thorndyke; Eduard Schreibmann; Yong Yang; Tian-Fang Li; Gwe-Ya Kim; Gary Luxton; Albert Koong
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.482

Review 4.  Dynamic targeting image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Calvin Huntzinger; Peter Munro; Scott Johnson; Mika Miettinen; Corey Zankowski; Greg Ahlstrom; Reto Glettig; Reto Filliberti; Wolfgang Kaissl; Martin Kamber; Martin Amstutz; Lionel Bouchet; Dan Klebanov; Hassan Mostafavi; Richard Stark
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.482

5.  A comparison of the use of bony anatomy and internal markers for offline verification and an evaluation of the potential benefit of online and offline verification protocols for prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Helen A McNair; Vibeke N Hansen; Christopher C Parker; Phil M Evans; Andrew Norman; Elizabeth Miles; Emma J Harris; Louise Del-Acroix; Elizabeth Smith; Richard Keane; Vincent S Khoo; Alan C Thompson; David P Dearnaley
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Radiation dose from cone beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Monica W K Kan; Lucullus H T Leung; Wicger Wong; Nelson Lam
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Radiation dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography in an image-guided radiotherapy procedure.

Authors:  George X Ding; Charles W Coffey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Planning target volume margins for prostate radiotherapy using daily electronic portal imaging and implanted fiducial markers.

Authors:  David Skarsgard; Pat Cadman; Ali El-Gayed; Robert Pearcey; Patricia Tai; Nadeem Pervez; Jackson Wu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Intrafraction motion of the prostate during external-beam radiation therapy: analysis of 427 patients with implanted fiducial markers.

Authors:  Alexis N T J Kotte; Pieter Hofman; Jan J W Lagendijk; Marco van Vulpen; Uulke A van der Heide
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Early clinical experience with kilovoltage image-guided radiation therapy for interfraction motion management.

Authors:  Joshua D Lawson; Tim Fox; Eric Elder; Adam Nowlan; Lawrence Davis; James Keller; Ian Crocker
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.482

View more
  5 in total

1.  CBCT-based synthetic CT generation using generative adversarial networks with disentangled representation.

Authors:  Jiwei Liu; Hui Yan; Hanlin Cheng; Jianfei Liu; Pengjian Sun; Boyi Wang; Ronghu Mao; Chi Du; Shengquan Luo
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-12

2.  Long-time clinical experience in patient setup for several particle therapy clinical indications: management of patient positioning and evaluation of setup reproducibility and stability.

Authors:  Rosalinda Ricotti; Andrea Pella; Barbara Tagaste; Giovanni Elisei; Giulia Fontana; Maria Bonora; Mario Ciocca; Francesca Valvo; Roberto Orecchia; Guido Baroni
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.629

3.  Evaluation of a multi-atlas CT synthesis approach for MRI-only radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  F Guerreiro; N Burgos; A Dunlop; K Wong; I Petkar; C Nutting; K Harrington; S Bhide; K Newbold; D Dearnaley; N M deSouza; V A Morgan; J McClelland; S Nill; M J Cardoso; S Ourselin; U Oelfke; A C Knopf
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Modeling of Acute Rectal Toxicity to Compare Two Patient Positioning Methods for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: Can Toxicity Modeling be Used for Quality Assurance?

Authors:  X Liu; J Li; S E Schild; M H Schild; W Wong; S Vora; M G Herman; M Fatyga
Journal:  OMICS J Radiol       Date:  2018-12-03

5.  2D kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers is more precise for daily image guided alignments than soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography for prostate radiation therapy.

Authors:  Peter H Goff; Louis B Harrison; Eli Furhang; Evan Ng; Stephen Bhatia; Frieda Trichter; Ronald D Ennis
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-05-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.