Literature DB >> 26658858

Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.

Katharine Molloy1, Timothy D Griffiths2, Maria Chait3, Nilli Lavie4.   

Abstract

Due to capacity limits on perception, conditions of high perceptual load lead to reduced processing of unattended stimuli (Lavie et al., 2014). Accumulating work demonstrates the effects of visual perceptual load on visual cortex responses, but the effects on auditory processing remain poorly understood. Here we establish the neural mechanisms underlying "inattentional deafness"--the failure to perceive auditory stimuli under high visual perceptual load. Participants performed a visual search task of low (target dissimilar to nontarget items) or high (target similar to nontarget items) load. On a random subset (50%) of trials, irrelevant tones were presented concurrently with the visual stimuli. Brain activity was recorded with magnetoencephalography, and time-locked responses to the visual search array and to the incidental presence of unattended tones were assessed. High, compared to low, perceptual load led to increased early visual evoked responses (within 100 ms from onset). This was accompanied by reduced early (∼ 100 ms from tone onset) auditory evoked activity in superior temporal sulcus and posterior middle temporal gyrus. A later suppression of the P3 "awareness" response to the tones was also observed under high load. A behavioral experiment revealed reduced tone detection sensitivity under high visual load, indicating that the reduction in neural responses was indeed associated with reduced awareness of the sounds. These findings support a neural account of shared audiovisual resources, which, when depleted under load, leads to failures of sensory perception and awareness. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The present work clarifies the neural underpinning of inattentional deafness under high visual load. The findings of near-simultaneous load effects on both visual and auditory evoked responses suggest shared audiovisual processing capacity. Temporary depletion of shared capacity in perceptually demanding visual tasks leads to a momentary reduction in sensory processing of auditory stimuli, resulting in inattentional deafness. The dynamic "push-pull" pattern of load effects on visual and auditory processing furthers our understanding of both the neural mechanisms of attention and of cross-modal effects across visual and auditory processing. These results also offer an explanation for many previous failures to find cross-modal effects in experiments where the visual load effects may not have coincided directly with auditory sensory processing.
Copyright © 2015 Molloy et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MEG; attentional load; auditory; visual

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26658858      PMCID: PMC4682776          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2931-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  54 in total

1.  The functional neuroanatomy of novelty processing: integrating ERP and fMRI results.

Authors:  B Opitz; A Mecklinger; A D Friederici; D Y von Cramon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Daniel H O'Connor; Miki M Fukui; Mark A Pinsk; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Increases in alpha oscillatory power reflect an active retinotopic mechanism for distracter suppression during sustained visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Simon P Kelly; Edmund C Lalor; Richard B Reilly; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change.

Authors:  C Escera; K Alho; I Winkler; R Näätänen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Joint decorrelation, a versatile tool for multichannel data analysis.

Authors:  Alain de Cheveigné; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources.

Authors:  C Wickens; A Kramer; L Vanasse; E Donchin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Spatial attention modulates initial afferent activity in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Simon P Kelly; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; John J Foxe
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Cortical responses to changes in acoustic regularity are differentially modulated by attentional load.

Authors:  Maria Chait; Christian C Ruff; Timothy D Griffiths; David McAlpine
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Enhancement and suppression in the visual field under perceptual load.

Authors:  Nathan A Parks; Diane M Beck; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-23
View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  A roadmap for the study of conscious audition and its neural basis.

Authors:  Andrew R Dykstra; Peter A Cariani; Alexander Gutschalk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Auditory Scene Analysis: An Attention Perspective.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Disruption in neural phase synchrony is related to identification of inattentional deafness in real-world setting.

Authors:  Daniel E Callan; Thibault Gateau; Gautier Durantin; Nicolas Gonthier; Frédéric Dehais
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neural signature of inattentional deafness.

Authors:  Gautier Durantin; Frederic Dehais; Nicolas Gonthier; Cengiz Terzibas; Daniel E Callan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Preserved sensory processing but hampered conflict detection when stimulus input is task-irrelevant.

Authors:  Tristan Bekinschtein; Simon van Gaal; Stijn Adriaan Nuiten; Andrés Canales-Johnson; Lola Beerendonk; Nutsa Nanuashvili; Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  The effect of distraction on change detection in crowded acoustic scenes.

Authors:  Theofilos Petsas; Jemma Harrison; Makio Kashino; Shigeto Furukawa; Maria Chait
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effects of Visual Speech on Early Auditory Evoked Fields - From the Viewpoint of Individual Variance.

Authors:  Izumi Yahata; Tetsuaki Kawase; Akitake Kanno; Hiroshi Hidaka; Shuichi Sakamoto; Nobukazu Nakasato; Ryuta Kawashima; Yukio Katori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Attention Trade-Off for Localization and Saccadic Remapping.

Authors:  Anna Dreneva; Ulyana Chernova; Maria Ermolova; William Joseph MacInnes
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20

9.  Changes of the Brain Causal Connectivity Networks in Patients With Long-Term Bilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Gang Zhang; Long-Chun Xu; Min-Feng Zhang; Yue Zou; Le-Min He; Yun-Fu Cheng; Dong-Sheng Zhang; Wen-Bo Zhao; Xiao-Yan Wang; Peng-Cheng Wang; Guang-Yu Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  The Role of Cognitive and Perceptual Loads in Inattentional Deafness.

Authors:  Mickaël Causse; Jean-Paul Imbert; Louise Giraudet; Christophe Jouffrais; Sébastien Tremblay
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.