Literature DB >> 24990357

Joint decorrelation, a versatile tool for multichannel data analysis.

Alain de Cheveigné1, Lucas C Parra2.   

Abstract

We review a simple yet versatile approach for the analysis of multichannel data, focusing in particular on brain signals measured with EEG, MEG, ECoG, LFP or optical imaging. Sensors are combined linearly with weights that are chosen to provide optimal signal-to-noise ratio. Signal and noise can be variably defined to match the specific need, e.g. reproducibility over trials, frequency content, or differences between stimulus conditions. We demonstrate how the method can be used to remove power line or cardiac interference, enhance stimulus-evoked or stimulus-induced activity, isolate narrow-band cortical activity, and so on. The approach involves decorrelating both the original and filtered data by joint diagonalization of their covariance matrices. We trace its origins; offer an easy-to-understand explanation; review a range of applications; and chart failure scenarios that might lead to misleading results, in particular due to overfitting. In addition to its flexibility and effectiveness, a major appeal of the method is that it is easy to understand.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifact rejection; Blind source separation (BSS); Common Spatial Pattern (CSP); Denoising; Denoising Source Separation (DSS); Electrocorticography (ECoG); Electroencephalography (EEG); Independent Component Analysis (ICA); Joint diagonalization; Local field potential (LFP); Magnetoencephalography (MEG); Multielectrode array; Noise reduction; Optical imaging; Principal Component Analysis (PCA); Simultaneous diagonalization; Time Domain source separation (TDSEP)

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24990357     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  45 in total

1.  Characterizing Regularization Techniques for Spatial Filter Optimization in Oscillatory EEG Regression Problems : Guidelines Derived from Simulation and Real-World Data.

Authors:  Andreas Meinel; Sebastián Castaño-Candamil; Benjamin Blankertz; Fabien Lotte; Michael Tangermann
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2019-04

2.  Multiple Midfrontal Thetas Revealed by Source Separation of Simultaneous MEG and EEG.

Authors:  Marrit B Zuure; Leighton B Hinkley; Paul H E Tiesinga; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Michael X Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cortical Representations of Speech in a Multitalker Auditory Scene.

Authors:  Krishna C Puvvada; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Brain responses in humans reveal ideal observer-like sensitivity to complex acoustic patterns.

Authors:  Nicolas Barascud; Marcus T Pearce; Timothy D Griffiths; Karl J Friston; Maria Chait
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Delta Vs Gamma Auditory Steady State Synchrony in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Krishna C Puvvada; Ann Summerfelt; Xiaoming Du; Nithin Krishna; Peter Kochunov; Laura M Rowland; Jonathan Z Simon; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Characterization of Electrophysiological Propagation by Multichannel Sensors.

Authors:  L Alan Bradshaw; Juliana H Kim; Suseela Somarajan; William O Richards; Leo K Cheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Dual signal subspace projection (DSSP): a novel algorithm for removing large interference in biomagnetic measurements.

Authors:  Kensuke Sekihara; Yuya Kawabata; Shuta Ushio; Satoshi Sumiya; Shigenori Kawabata; Yoshiaki Adachi; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Rapid computations of spectrotemporal prediction error support perception of degraded speech.

Authors:  Ediz Sohoglu; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Detecting changes in dynamic and complex acoustic environments.

Authors:  Yves Boubenec; Jennifer Lawlor; Urszula Górska; Shihab Shamma; Bernhard Englitz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.

Authors:  Katharine Molloy; Timothy D Griffiths; Maria Chait; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.