Literature DB >> 23771399

The gist of the abnormal: above-chance medical decision making in the blink of an eye.

Karla K Evans1, Diane Georgian-Smith, Rosemary Tambouret, Robyn L Birdwell, Jeremy M Wolfe.   

Abstract

Very fast extraction of global structural and statistical regularities allows us to access the "gist"--the basic meaning--of real-world images in as little as 20 ms. Gist processing is central to efficient assessment and orienting in complex environments. This ability is probably based on our extensive experience with the regularities of the natural world. If that is so, would experts develop an ability to extract the gist from the artificial stimuli (e.g., medical images) with which they have extensive visual experience? Anecdotally, experts report some ability to categorize images as normal or abnormal before actually finding an abnormality. We tested the reality of this perception in two expert populations: radiologists and cytologists. Observers viewed brief (250- to 2,000-ms) presentations of medical images. The presence of abnormality was randomized across trials. The task was to rate the abnormality of an image on a 0-100 analog scale and then to attempt to localize that abnormality on a subsequent screen showing only the outline of the image. Both groups of experts had above-chance performance for detecting subtle abnormalities at all stimulus durations (cytologists d' ≈ 1.2 and radiologists d' ≈ 1), whereas the nonexpert control groups did not differ from chance (d' ≈ 0.23, d' ≈ 0.25). Furthermore, the experts' ability to localize these abnormalities was at chance levels, suggesting that categorization was based on a global signal, and not on fortuitous attention to a localized target. It is possible that this global signal could be exploited to improve clinical performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23771399      PMCID: PMC3851597          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0459-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

1.  Modeling categorization of scenes containing consistent versus inconsistent objects.

Authors:  Michael L Mack; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Visual sensing IS seeing: why "mindsight," in hindsight, is blind.

Authors:  Daniel J Simons; Gabriel Nevarez; Walter R Boot
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-07

3.  Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli.

Authors:  A Oliva; P G Schyns
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Lung lesions: correlation between viewing time and detection.

Authors:  J W Oestmann; R Greene; D C Kushner; P M Bourgouin; L Linetsky; H J Llewellyn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Ultra-rapid visual categorisation of natural and artifactual objects.

Authors:  R VanRullen; S J Thorpe
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Finding lung nodules with and without comparative visual scanning.

Authors:  D P Carmody; C F Nodine; H L Kundel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-06

Review 7.  Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L-H Võ; Karla K Evans; Michelle R Greene
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  When categories collide: accumulation of information about multiple categories in rapid scene perception.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-05-09

9.  Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: seeing the forest without representing the trees.

Authors:  Michelle R Greene; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Processing scene context: fast categorization and object interference.

Authors:  Olivier R Joubert; Guillaume A Rousselet; Denis Fize; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Attention in the real world: toward understanding its neural basis.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The effect of expert knowledge on medical search: medical experts have specialized abilities for detecting serious lesions.

Authors:  Ryoichi Nakashima; Chisaki Watanabe; Eriko Maeda; Takeharu Yoshikawa; Izuru Matsuda; Soichiro Miki; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-10-01

3.  Classification errors and response times over multiple distributed sessions as a function of category structure.

Authors:  Derek E Zeigler; Ronaldo Vigo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10

4.  Rapid perceptual processing in two- and three-dimensional prostate images.

Authors:  Melissa Treviño; Baris Turkbey; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Marcin Czarniecki; Peter L Choyke; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-01-03

5.  Gist processing in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Nicholas M D'Ardenne; Robert M Nishikawa; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-12-18

6.  Visual search in breast imaging.

Authors:  Ziba Gandomkar; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  A half-second glimpse often lets radiologists identify breast cancer cases even when viewing the mammogram of the opposite breast.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Tamara Miner Haygood; Julie Cooper; Anne-Marie Culpan; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  HOW DO RADIOLOGISTS USE THE HUMAN SEARCH ENGINE?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Karla K Evans; Trafton Drew; Avigael Aizenman; Emilie Josephs
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 9.  Using fuzzy-trace theory to understand and improve health judgments, decisions, and behaviors: A literature review.

Authors:  Susan J Blalock; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  Detecting the "gist" of breast cancer in mammograms three years before localized signs of cancer are visible.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Anne-Marie Culpan; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.