Literature DB >> 8301354

Visual search among items of different salience: removal of visual attention mimics a lesion in extrastriate area V4.

J Braun1.   

Abstract

In more than one respect, visual search for the most salient or the least salient item in a display are different kinds of visual tasks. The present work investigated whether this difference is primarily one of perceptual difficulty, or whether it is more fundamental and relates to visual attention. Display items of different salience were produced by varying either size, contrast, color saturation, or pattern. Perceptual masking was employed and, on average, mask onset was delayed longer in search for the least salient item than in search for the most salient item. As a result, the two types of visual search presented comparable perceptual difficulty, as judged by psychophysical measures of performance, effective stimulus contrast, and stability of decision criterion. To investigate the role of attention in the two types of search, observers attempted to carry out a letter discrimination and a search task concurrently. To discriminate the letters, observers had to direct visual attention at the center of the display and, thus, leave unattended the periphery, which contained target and distractors of the search task. In this situation, visual search for the least salient item was severely impaired while visual search for the most salient item was only moderately affected, demonstrating a fundamental difference with respect to visual attention. A qualitatively identical pattern of results was encountered by Schiller and Lee (1991), who used similar visual search tasks to assess the effect of a lesion in extrastriate area V4 of the macaque.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8301354      PMCID: PMC6576816     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  14 in total

1.  Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention.

Authors:  Fei Fei Li; Rufin VanRullen; Christof Koch; Pietro Perona
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Response suppression in v1 agrees with psychophysics of surround masking.

Authors:  Barbara Zenger-Landolt; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Biased competition and visual search: the role of luminance and size contrast.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-08-08

4.  Is visual attention required for robust picture memory?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Kristin O Michod
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Effects of spatial attention on motion discrimination are greater in the left than right visual field.

Authors:  Rain G Bosworth; Jennifer A F Petrich; Karen R Dobkins
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Contrast adaptation and representation in human early visual cortex.

Authors:  Justin L Gardner; Pei Sun; R Allen Waggoner; Kenichi Ueno; Keiji Tanaka; Kang Cheng
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Components of visual search in childhood-onset schizophrenia and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  C Karatekin; R F Asarnow
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1998-10

Review 9.  HOW DO RADIOLOGISTS USE THE HUMAN SEARCH ENGINE?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Karla K Evans; Trafton Drew; Avigael Aizenman; Emilie Josephs
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  The New Robotics-towards human-centered machines.

Authors:  Stefan Schaal
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2007-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.