Literature DB >> 26655972

Data-driven model comparing the effects of glial scarring and interface interactions on chronic neural recordings in non-human primates.

Karlo A Malaga1, Karen E Schroeder, Paras R Patel, Zachary T Irwin, David E Thompson, J Nicole Bentley, Scott F Lempka, Cynthia A Chestek, Parag G Patil.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We characterized electrode stability over twelve weeks of impedance and neural recording data from four chronically-implanted Utah arrays in two rhesus macaques, and investigated the effects of glial scarring and interface interactions at the electrode recording site on signal quality using a computational model. APPROACH: A finite-element model of a Utah array microelectrode in neural tissue was coupled with a multi-compartmental model of a neuron to quantify the effects of encapsulation thickness, encapsulation resistivity, and interface resistivity on electrode impedance and waveform amplitude. The coupled model was then reconciled with the in vivo data. Histology was obtained seventeen weeks post-implantation to measure gliosis. MAIN
RESULTS: From week 1-3, mean impedance and amplitude increased at rates of 115.8 kΩ/week and 23.1 μV/week, respectively. This initial ramp up in impedance and amplitude was observed across all arrays, and is consistent with biofouling (increasing interface resistivity) and edema clearing (increasing tissue resistivity), respectively, in the model. Beyond week 3, the trends leveled out. Histology showed that thin scars formed around the electrodes. In the model, scarring could not match the in vivo data. However, a thin interface layer at the electrode tip could. Despite having a large effect on impedance, interface resistivity did not have a noticeable effect on amplitude. SIGNIFICANCE: This study suggests that scarring does not cause an electrical problem with regard to signal quality since it does not appear to be the main contributor to increasing impedance or significantly affect amplitude unless it displaces neurons. This, in turn, suggests that neural signals can be obtained reliably despite scarring as long as the recording site has sufficiently low impedance after accumulating a thin layer of biofouling. Therefore, advancements in microelectrode technology may be expedited by focusing on improvements to the recording site-tissue interface rather than elimination of the glial scar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26655972     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/1/016010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  25 in total

1.  Glial responses to implanted electrodes in the brain.

Authors:  Joseph W Salatino; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai; Erin K Purcell
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 25.671

2.  Toward guiding principles for the design of biologically-integrated electrodes for the central nervous system.

Authors:  Cort H Thompson; Ti'Air E Riggins; Paras R Patel; Cynthia A Chestek; Wen Li; Erin Purcell
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Rodent model for assessing the long term safety and performance of peripheral nerve recording electrodes.

Authors:  Srikanth Vasudevan; Kunal Patel; Cristin Welle
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 4.  Physiological properties of brain-machine interface input signals.

Authors:  Marc W Slutzky; Robert D Flint
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Quantitative simulation of extracellular single unit recording from the surface of cortex.

Authors:  Mackenna Hill; Estefania Rios; Shyam Kumar Sudhakar; Douglas H Roossien; Ciara Caldwell; Dawen Cai; Omar J Ahmed; Scott F Lempka; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Electrodeposited platinum-iridium coating improves in vivo recording performance of chronically implanted microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Isaac R Cassar; Chunxiu Yu; Jaydeep Sambangi; Curtis D Lee; John J Whalen; Artin Petrossians; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Unique electrophysiological and impedance signatures between encapsulation types: An analysis of biological Utah array failure and benefit of a biomimetic coating in a rat model.

Authors:  Patrick A Cody; James R Eles; Carl F Lagenaur; Takashi D Y Kozai; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Rapid evaluation of the durability of cortical neural implants using accelerated aging with reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Pavel Takmakov; Kiersten Ruda; K Scott Phillips; Irada S Isayeva; Victor Krauthamer; Cristin G Welle
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Multi-scale, multi-modal analysis uncovers complex relationship at the brain tissue-implant neural interface: new emphasis on the biological interface.

Authors:  Nicholas J Michelson; Alberto L Vazquez; James R Eles; Joseph W Salatino; Erin K Purcell; Jordan J Williams; X Tracy Cui; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Chronic in vivo stability assessment of carbon fiber microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Paras R Patel; Huanan Zhang; Matthew T Robbins; Justin B Nofar; Shaun P Marshall; Michael J Kobylarek; Takashi D Y Kozai; Nicholas A Kotov; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.