| Literature DB >> 26642925 |
Lilian E Hunt1, Boris Noyvert1, Leena Bhaw-Rosun2, Abdul K Sesay2, Lavinia Paternoster3, Ellen A Nohr4, George Davey Smith3, Niels Tommerup5, Thorkild I A Sørensen3,6,7, Greg Elgar8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Association studies have identified a number of loci that contribute to an increased body mass index (BMI), the strongest of which is in the first intron of the FTO gene on human chromosome 16q12.2. However, this region is both non-coding and under strong linkage disequilibrium, making it recalcitrant to functional interpretation. Furthermore, the FTO gene is located within a complex cis-regulatory landscape defined by a topologically associated domain that includes the IRXB gene cluster, a trio of developmental regulators. Consequently, at least three genes in this interval have been implicated in the aetiology of obesity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26642925 PMCID: PMC4671217 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-015-0250-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Med ISSN: 1756-994X Impact factor: 11.117
Study group details
| rs9939609 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T/T (%) | A/A (%) | Total (%) | Average BMI | Variance (95 % CI) | Standard error from mean | |
| Controls. BMI <31 kg/m2 | 106 (37.3) | 55 (19.4) | 161 (56.7) | 21.5 | ±0.4 | 4.3 |
| Cases. BMI ≥31 kg/m2 | 59 (20.8) | 64 (22.5) | 123 (43.3) | 33.2 | ±0.5 | 5.6 |
| Total | 165 (58.1) | 119 (41.9) | 284 (100) | 26.5 | ±0.7 | 7.1 |
Fig. 1Variant frequencies across the 2 Mb interval. The allele frequency of each variant in our study group is plotted against its frequency in European populations from the 1,000 Genomes Project. Only variants identified in both sets of data in the same format are directly compared (n = 8338). Two SNPs give very high values in our study group but low values in the Europeans population; these are artefacts caused by simple sequence repeats
Variant summary data for chr16q12.2 classified by functional region and BMI status
| Region | Size of region (kb) | Number of variant locations | Variant locations per Kb | Mean MAF | Average number variants per individual | Average number non-ref alleles per individual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNEs | 25.1 | Cases 117 | 4.66 | 0.118 | 20.03 | 27.52 |
| Controls 109 | 4.34 | 0.127 | 19.94 | 27.60 | ||
| Total 141 | 5.61 | 0.098 | 19.98 | 27.57 | ||
| Coding | 17.2 | Cases 38 | 2.21 | 0.075 | 4.61 | 5.37 |
| Controls 56 | 3.26 | 0.051 | 4.75 | 5.40 | ||
| Total 70 | 4.07 | 0.041 | 4.69 | 5.39 | ||
| Non-coding | 1,957.7 | Cases 11014 | 5.51 | 0.181 | 2853 | 3916 |
| Controls 11826 | 5.91 | 0.167 | 2836 | 3892 | ||
| Total 13980 | 6.94 | 0.142 | 2843 | 3902 |
Fig. 2Allele frequencies for each variant across the 2 Mb interval compared between controls and cases. Variants within the AH44 LD block are in red and variants in the second association region upstream of IRX5 are in green
Fig. 3Association of SNPs in cases vs. controls. Minus log10(P value) of Case/Control association for each SNP across the 2 Mb interval generated from Haploview [38] and represented by vertical blue lines. The first peak (at 53.82 Mb) in the intron of FTO shows the known association at rs9939609:T > A and reflects the strong linkage disequilibrium across that region. The second peak (54.84 Mb) indicates a novel associated region upstream of IRX5
Fig. 4Linkage disequilibrium across the two associated regions. Mountain plots generated by Haploview [38] for (a) rs9939609:T > A associated region chr16:53,797,908-53,846,168 (48.3 kb) and (b) the novel associated region at chr16:54,812,014-54,865,446 (53.4 kb), across our complete study group. Bright red represents D’ = 1 and LOD ≥ 2 (complete dependence and strong evidence for linkage); shades of pink/red represent D’ < 1 and LOD ≥ 2; blue represents D’ = 1 and LOD < 2; white represents D’ < 1 and LOD < 2(low dependency and poor evidence for linkage). The full plot of the region sequenced is shown for reference (chr16:53500000-55500000)
Replication data using SNP rs12598453:C > G as a representative of the three SNPs referred to in the text
| Cohort | Number of individuals | Number of controls, cases | AF in cases, controls |
| BMI averages by genotype: CC, CG, GG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequenced men | 284 | 161, 123 | 0.491, 0.646 | 0.00021 | 25.2, 26.03, 28.13 |
| Male GOYA | 1,450 | 785, 665 | 0.496, 0.547 | 0.0054 | 26.51, 26.89, 27.39 |
| GOYA men, younger than 25 years | 1,381 | 749, 632 | 0.493, 0.551 | 0.0027 | 26.45, 26.85, 27.47 |
| Female GOYA | 3,908 | 1948, 1960 | 0.507, 0.529 | 0.056 | 30.00, 30.21, 30.46 |
| GOYA women, younger than 25 years | 562 | 255, 307 | 0.465, 0.560 | 0.0014 | 29.79, 30.67, 32.5 |
| All combined | 5,401 | 2762, 2639 | 0.503, 0.534 | 0.0012 | 29.04, 29.24, 29.63 |
| All combined, younger than 25 years | 1,984 | 1032, 952 | 0.486, 0.556 | 0.000011 | 27.35, 27.85, 28.89 |
Fig. 5Comparison of association data with previously mapped FTO and IRX3 interactions. Association data for bi-allelic SNPs identified in this study are mapped to the mm9 mouse genome build and represented in blue (methods). The IRX3 (green) and FTO (red) promoter interaction data [21] are shown for the same region allowing a direct comparison of our SNP associations and previously published interaction data