| Literature DB >> 24978468 |
Koichi Akiyama1, Fumihiko Takeuchi1, Masato Isono1, Sureka Chakrawarthy2, Quang Ngoc Nguyen3, Wanqing Wen4, Ken Yamamoto5, Tomohiro Katsuya6, Anuradhani Kasturiratne2, Son Thai Pham3, Wei Zheng4, Yumi Matsushita7, Miyako Kishimoto8, Loi Doan Do3, Xiao-Ou Shu4, Ananda R Wickremasinghe2, Hiroshi Kajio8, Norihiro Kato1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24978468 PMCID: PMC4076329 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Plots of SNP–trait association and SNP partitioning for the 16q12.2/FTO region in Japanese (type 2 diabetes, a) and Europeans (type 2 diabetes, b; BMI, c).
Association results for Europeans are drawn from the published studies [19], [20]. a, b and c each contain three panels. In the top panels, all assayed/imputed SNPs in the GWA scan (that passed the quality control) are plotted with their −log10 (p-values) for type 2 diabetes (a and b) and BMI (c) against chromosome position (in Mb): genotypes are imputed to the HapMap Phase 2 data set. In the second panels, the genomic locations of RefSeq genes with intron and exon structure (NCBI Build 37) are displayed. The third panels show the plots for the intron-1 FTO region, where the associated SNPs are partitioned into seven clusters and colored accordingly (see Methods).
SNP–BMI association at the FTO locus in multiple ethnic groups.
| Group | SNPs tested for BMI association at | |||||||||
| rs7206790 | rs1421085 | rs9939609 | rs9941349 | rs56137030 | rs62033408 | rs17817964 | rs7188250 (rs72805612) | rs12149832 | ||
| Effect/other allele | G/C | C/T | A/T | T/C | A/G | G/A | T/C | C/T | A/G | |
| Japanese (n = 10,659) | Effect al. freq. | 0.212 | 0.183 | 0.184 | 0.210 | 0.183 | 0.182 | 0.216 | 0.189 | 0.189 |
| BETA (SE) | 0.056 (0.016) | 0.072 (0.017) | 0.067 (0.017) | 0.049 (0.016) | 0.068 (0.017) | 0.065 (0.018) | 0.059 (0.016) | 0.064 (0.017) | 0.061 (0.017) | |
|
| 5.5E-4 | 2.3E-5 | 8.5E-5 | 0.003 | 6.9E-5 | 2.1E-4 | 2.3E-4 | 2.3E-4 | 2.5E-4 | |
| Vietnamese (n = 3,324) | Effect al. freq. | 0.192 | 0.188 | 0.189 | 0.237 | 0.188 | 0.187 | 0.201 | 0.197 | 0.192 |
| BETA (SE) | 0.056 (0.031) | 0.039 (0.027) | 0.051 (0.028) | 0.024 (0.026) | 0.047 (0.028) | 0.051 (0.027) | 0.049 (0.028) | 0.059 (0.027) | 0.067 (0.027) | |
|
| 0.072 | 0.150 | 0.064 | 0.364 | 0.085 | 0.065 | 0.073 | 0.029 | 0.012 | |
| Sri Lankan (n = 3,029) | Effect al. freq. | 0.345 | 0.343 | 0.328 | 0.399 | 0.328 | 0.326 | 0.325 | 0.365 | 0.368 |
| BETA (SE) | 0.059 (0.027) | 0.098 (0.031) | 0.1 (0.031) | 0.08 (0.028) | 0.096 (0.031) | 0.098 (0.031) | 0.087 (0.03) | 0.079 (0.03) | 0.071 (0.031) | |
|
| 0.033 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.009 | 0.019 | |
| Combined (n = 17,584) | BETA (SE) | 0.057 (0.013) | 0.069 (0.013) | 0.069 (0.013) | 0.049 (0.012) | 0.068 (0.013) | 0.068 (0.013) | 0.062 (0.013) | 0.065 (0.013) | 0.064 (0.013) |
|
| 8.9E-6 | 1.2E-7 | 1.3E-7 | 7.2E-5 | 2.0E-7 | 3.7E-7 | 8.4E-7 | 6.2E-7 | 5.7E-7 | |
|
| 0.85 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.95 | 0.89 | 0.84 | |
| European | Effect al. freq. | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.47 | N/A | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.45 |
| BETA (SE) | N/A | 0.082 (0.004) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
|
| 2.3E-30 | 3.1E-62 | 9.9E-60 | 1.8E-54 | N/A | N/A | 1.4E-59 | N/A | 5.6E-58 | |
| African American (n = 20,488) | Effect al. freq. | 0.59 | 0.12 | 0.52 | 0.19 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| BETA (SE) | N/A | 0.053 (0.015) | 0.002 (0.009) | 0.033 (0.012) | 0.064 (0.014) | 0.049 (0.015) | 0.049 (0.014) | 0.064 (0.015) | 0.044 (0.015) | |
|
| N/A | 3.0E-04 | 0.82 | 0.005 | 8.3E-06 | 0.001 | 8.6E-04 | 1.3E-05 | 2.5E-03 | |
In each group, two separate panels were characterized and combined by meta-analysis: Amagasaki and Fukuoka panels in Japanese, Hanoi and Thai Binh panels in Vietnamese, and Ragama and estate panels in Sri Lankans (see Methods).
BETA and SEM of each trait are shown as z-score after adjustment for standard deviation.
Besides the SNPs listed in Table 2, two SNPs—rs62033408 and rs72805612 (in complete LD with rs7188250)—were tested for BMI association, because these showed significant association in African-Americans [7].
P hetero; P-value for Inter-population heterogeneity among three Asian groups.
rs9939609 is in complete LD (r = 1.000) with rs62033400 in both HapMap CEU and HapMap JPT+CHB, whereas they are not in strong LD (r = 0.065) in HapMap YRI. In African Americans, rs62033400 showed strong association with BMI (P = 1.1E-5). In HapMap JPT+CHB, rs9923544 and rs9941349 are in complete LD (r = 1.00).
Results for Europeans are drawn from the GIANT consortium (http://www.broadinstitute.org/collaboration/giant/index.php/GIANT_consortium) and those for African Americans are from the published data [7]; the effect allele frequencies in Europeans are from HapMap CEU data.
*In European populations, the results for a proxy, rs1558902, which is in complete LD (r = 1.0) with rs1421085 in HapMap CEU, were reported.
FTO Haplotypes involving index SNPs and their association with BMI and type 2 diabetes.
| Lead SNPs in the associated | Haplotype frequency | BMI association in meta-analysis (n = 17,128) | T2D association in meta-analysis (n = 15,098) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Haplotype class | rs7206790 | rs1421085 | rs3751812 | rs9939609 | rs9941349 | rs56137030 | rs17817964 | rs12149832 | African ancestry (n = 246) | European ancestry (n = 379) | East Asian ancestry (n = 286) | Japanese (n = 2,046) | Vietnam-ese (n = 1,196) | SriLankan (n = 2,437) | Beta | Standard error |
| Hetero-geneity, | OR | Standard error |
| Hetero-geneity, |
| H1 | G/C | C | T | A | T | A | T | A | 0.05 | 0.41 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.32 | 0.064 | 0.014 | 2.1E-6 | 0.758 | 1.221 | 0.029 | 8.9E-12 | 0.695 |
| H1-2 | G | C | T |
| T |
| T | A | None | 0.003 | None | None | None | Low | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| H1-3 | G | C | T |
| T | A | T |
| None | 0.01 | Low | 0.01 | 0.01 | Low | 0.048 | 0.087 | 0.583 | 0.211 | 1.040 | 0.189 | 0.837 | 0.998 |
| H2-1 | G |
|
|
|
| A |
|
| 0.01 | None | None | None | None | None | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| H2 (ancestral) | G/C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.45 | None | None | Low | Low | Low | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| H2-2 | C/G |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.03 | None | None | None | Low | None | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| H3 | C/G |
|
| T |
|
|
|
| 0.38 | 0.53 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.54 | -0.045 | 0.012 | 2.0E-4 | 0.944 | 0.889 | 0.027 | 9.3E-6 | 0.685 |
| H3-1 | G |
|
| T |
|
|
|
| Low | 0.02 | None | Low | Low | 0.02 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| H3-3 | C |
|
| T |
|
|
|
| None | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.025 | 0.045 | 0.574 | 0.154 | 1.066 | 0.107 | 0.555 | 0.795 |
| H3-4 | C |
|
| T |
|
|
|
| None | None | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | None | −0.010 | 0.035 | 0.777 | 0.377 | 0.934 | 0.074 | 0.358 | 0.349 |
| H4 | C/G |
|
| T |
|
|
|
| 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.07 | −0.048 | 0.028 | 0.089 | 0.312 | 0.881 | 0.067 | 0.057 | 0.549 |
It is assumed that a cluster of base-substitutions (involving rs1421085, rs3751812, rs9941349, rs56137030, rs17817964, and rs12149832) initially occurred, followed by another cluster of base-substitutions (involving rs9939609) within the target interval at FTO. Then, presumably the underlined alleles were produced by either recombination or recurrent base-substitutions that occurred independently at each SNP (see Figure 2 and Table S5). Ancestral types of alleles are shown in bold letters.
In the estimates of haplotype frequency, they are labelled with “Low”when the frequency is <0.004 (except for H1–2 in the European-ancestry population).
There is recombination between rs7206790 and other assayed SNPs. For rs7206790, haplotypes with recombination are further split by two alleles; the major and minor alleles are shown in the left and right sides of the slash for the corresponding haplotypes.
rs3751812 was genotyped in T2D-association samples alone (but not in BMI-association samples) because rs3751812 and rs9939609 could not be differentiated due to the absence of H2 haplotype class in populations of East Asian and European ancestry. BMI/T2D association in each population was calculated by using haplotype-based linear/logistic regression with PLINK. The effect sizes of three Asian populations (Japanese, Vietnamese and Sri Lankan) were combined by a fixed-effect meta-analysis, while SriLankan data were not used for H1-3 and H3-4 because of the low frequency.
*Besides the SNPs tagging individual LD clusters that were drawn from T2D association results (see Figure 1), rs1421085 and rs56137030 were characterized in the present study, because they were reported to be promising candidates for causal variants at FTO in African American populations [7].
**Test of heterogeneity in effect size between the three populations meta-analyzed in the present study.
Figure 2Estimated haplotype phylogeny at the FTO locus.
Haplotypes with frequencies ≥0.05 are demonstrated in the figure, apart from H1-1, H1-2, H1-3, H3-1 and H3-3, which could be generated by recombination. Also see Table 2 and Table S5.
Figure 3Overlap of SNPs associated with BMI at FTO.
The Venn diagram illustrates the number of SNPs that show association with BMI in any of three ethnic groups. The total number of associated SNPs in individual ethnic groups is listed in parentheses after the ethnic group name.