Literature DB >> 26635927

Short and long term outcomes of 200 patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Athanasios Tsiouris1, Gaetano Paone1, Hassan W Nemeh1, Jamil Borgi1, Celeste T Williams1, David E Lanfear1, Jeffrey A Morgan1.   

Abstract

AIM: To study the institutional experience over 8 years with 200 continuous-flow (CF) - left ventricular assist devices (LVAD).
METHODS: We evaluated our institution's LVAD database and analyzed all patients who received a CF LVAD as a bridge to transplant (BTT) or destination therapy from March 2006 until June 2014. We identified 200 patients, of which 179 were implanted with a HeartMate II device (Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, CA) and 21 received a Heartware HVAD (HeartWare Inc., Framingham, MA).
RESULTS: The mean age of our LVAD recipients was 59.3 years (range 17-81), 76% (152/200) were males, and 49% were implanted for the indication of BTT. The survival rate for our LVAD patients at 30 d, 6 mo, 12 mo, 2 years, 3 years, and 4 years was 94%, 86%, 78%, 71%, 62% and 45% respectively. The mean duration of LVAD support was 581 d (range 2-2595 d). Gastrointestinal bleeding (was the most common adverse event (43/200, 21%), followed by right ventricular failure (38/200, 19%), stroke (31/200, 15%), re exploration for bleeding (31/200, 15%), ventilator dependent respiratory failure (19/200, 9%) and pneumonia (15/200, 7%). Our driveline infection rate was 7%. Pump thrombosis occurred in 6% of patients. Device exchanged was needed in 6% of patients. On multivariate analysis, preoperative liver dysfunction, ventilator dependent respiratory failure, tracheostomy and right ventricular failure requiring right ventricular assist device support were significant predictors of post LVAD survival.
CONCLUSION: Short and long term survival for patients on LVAD support are excellent, although outcomes still remain inferior compared to heart transplantation. The incidence of driveline infections, pump thrombosis and pump exchange have declined significantly in recent years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous-flow; Heart failure; Left ventricular assist device; Outcomes

Year:  2015        PMID: 26635927      PMCID: PMC4660474          DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i11.792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Cardiol


  36 in total

1.  Septal function during left ventricular unloading.

Authors:  M R Moon; A F Bolger; A DeAnda; M Komeda; G T Daughters; S D Nikolic; D C Miller; N B Ingels
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-03-04       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Six-year experience of caring for forty-four patients with a left ventricular assist device at home: safe, economical, necessary.

Authors:  D L Morales; K A Catanese; D N Helman; M R Williams; A Weinberg; D J Goldstein; E A Rose; M C Oz
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 3.  Ventricular interactions during mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  D J Farrar
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1994-07

4.  Age and preoperative total bilirubin level can stratify prognosis after extracorporeal pulsatile left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Taro Shiga; Koichiro Kinugawa; Masaru Hatano; Atsushi Yao; Takashi Nishimura; Miyoko Endo; Naoko Kato; Yasunobu Hirata; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono; Ryozo Nagai
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.993

5.  Lessons learned from 150 continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a single institutional 7 year experience.

Authors:  Athanasios Tsiouris; Gaetano Paone; Hassan W Nemeh; Robert J Brewer; Jamil Borgi; Arielle Hodari; Jeffrey A Morgan
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Should left ventricular assist devices be implanted in patients seventy years of age and older: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Morgan; Hassan W Nemeh; Gaetano Paone
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 0.676

7.  Factors determining post-operative readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Athanasios Tsiouris; Gaetano Paone; Hassan W Nemeh; Robert J Brewer; Jeffrey A Morgan
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Cerebrovascular accidents in patients with a ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tsukui; Adib Abla; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Dennis M McNamara; Michael A Mathier; Linda M Cadaret; Robert L Kormos
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Significance of postoperative acute renal failure after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Jamil Borgi; Athanasios Tsiouris; Arielle Hodari; Chad M Cogan; Gaetano Paone; Jeffrey A Morgan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Outcomes and predictors of early mortality after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation as a bridge to transplantation.

Authors:  Anton Sabashnikov; Prashant N Mohite; Bartlomiej Zych; Diana García; Aron-Frederik Popov; Alexander Weymann; Nikhil P Patil; Rachel Hards; Massimo Capoccia; Thorsten Wahlers; Fabio De Robertis; Toufan Bahrami; Mohamed Amrani; Nicholas R Banner; André R Simon
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.872

View more
  11 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients: Red Scare or Pressure from the Right?

Authors:  Grigoriy E Gurvits
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Factors defining occurrence of ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes during continuous flow left ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Athanasios Tsiouris; Ioannis Heliopoulos; Dimitrios Mikroulis; Panayiotis D Mitsias
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-08-21

3.  Cost-effectiveness of Dapagliflozin for Treatment of Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Justin T Parizo; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Joshua A Salomon; Kiran K Khush; John A Spertus; Paul A Heidenreich; Alexander T Sandhu
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 30.154

4.  Evidence for synergy between sarcomeres and fibroblasts in an in vitro model of myocardial reverse remodeling.

Authors:  Shi Shen; Lorenzo R Sewanan; Stuart G Campbell
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.763

Review 5.  Bleeding with the artificial heart: Gastrointestinal hemorrhage in CF-LVAD patients.

Authors:  Grigoriy E Gurvits; Elena Fradkov
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Perioperative Enteral Nutrition After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Ryuichiro Abe; Atsuhiro Matsumoto; Ryota Sakaguchi; Koichi Toda; Yoshiki Sawa; Akinori Uchiyama; Yuji Fujino
Journal:  Nutr Metab Insights       Date:  2018-11-16

Review 7.  Ventricular Assist Device-Specific Infections.

Authors:  Yue Qu; Anton Y Peleg; David McGiffin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 8.  Cardiac mechanostructure: Using mechanics and anisotropy as inspiration for developing epicardial therapies in treating myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kiera D Dwyer; Kareen L K Coulombe
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-01-20

9.  Five-year outcomes following left ventricular assist device implantation in England.

Authors:  Alex Bottle; Puji Faitna; Paul P Aylin; Martin R Cowie
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-05

10.  Does endoscopic intervention prevent subsequent gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with left ventricular assist devices? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Sonali Palchaudhuri; Ishita Dhawan; Afshin Parsikia; Edo Y Birati; Joyce Wald; Shazia Mehmood Siddique; Laurel R Fisher
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.