Justin T Parizo1, Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert2, Joshua A Salomon2, Kiran K Khush1, John A Spertus3, Paul A Heidenreich1,4, Alexander T Sandhu1. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 2. Stanford Health Policy, Centers for Health Policy and Primary Care and Outcomes Research, The Freeman Spogli Institute, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 3. St Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, University of Missouri-Kansas City. 4. Division of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Abstract
Importance: In the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure (DAPA-HF) trial, dapagliflozin was shown to reduce cardiovascular mortality and hospitalizations due to heart failure while improving patient-reported health status. However, the cost-effectiveness of adding dapagliflozin therapy to standard of care (SOC) is unknown. Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin therapy among patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Design, Setting, and Participants: This Markov cohort cost-effectiveness model used estimates of therapy effectiveness, transition probabilities, and utilities from the DAPA-HF trial and other published literature. Costs were derived from published sources. Patients with HFrEF included subgroups based on diabetes status and health status impairment due to heart failure. We compiled parameters from the literature including DAPA-HF, on which our model is based, and many other sources from December 2019 to February 27, 2021. We performed our analysis in February 2021. Exposures: Dapagliflozin or SOC. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospitalizations for heart failure, life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and the cost per QALY gained (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio). Results: In the model, dapagliflozin therapy yielded a mean of 0.78 additional life-years and 0.46 additional QALYs compared with SOC at an incremental cost of $38 212, resulting in a cost per QALY gained of $83 650. The cost per QALY was similar for patients with or without diabetes and for patients with mild or moderate impairment of health status due to heart failure. The cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to estimates of the effect on mortality and duration of therapy effectiveness. If the cost of dapagliflozin decreased from $474 to $270 (43% decline), the cost per QALY gained would drop below $50 000. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that dapagliflozin provides intermediate value compared with SOC, based on American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association benchmarks. Additional data regarding the magnitude of mortality reduction would improve the precision of cost-effectiveness estimates.
Importance: In the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure (DAPA-HF) trial, dapagliflozin was shown to reduce cardiovascular mortality and hospitalizations due to heart failure while improving patient-reported health status. However, the cost-effectiveness of adding dapagliflozin therapy to standard of care (SOC) is unknown. Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin therapy among patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Design, Setting, and Participants: This Markov cohort cost-effectiveness model used estimates of therapy effectiveness, transition probabilities, and utilities from the DAPA-HF trial and other published literature. Costs were derived from published sources. Patients with HFrEF included subgroups based on diabetes status and health status impairment due to heart failure. We compiled parameters from the literature including DAPA-HF, on which our model is based, and many other sources from December 2019 to February 27, 2021. We performed our analysis in February 2021. Exposures: Dapagliflozin or SOC. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospitalizations for heart failure, life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and the cost per QALY gained (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio). Results: In the model, dapagliflozin therapy yielded a mean of 0.78 additional life-years and 0.46 additional QALYs compared with SOC at an incremental cost of $38 212, resulting in a cost per QALY gained of $83 650. The cost per QALY was similar for patients with or without diabetes and for patients with mild or moderate impairment of health status due to heart failure. The cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to estimates of the effect on mortality and duration of therapy effectiveness. If the cost of dapagliflozin decreased from $474 to $270 (43% decline), the cost per QALY gained would drop below $50 000. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that dapagliflozin provides intermediate value compared with SOC, based on American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association benchmarks. Additional data regarding the magnitude of mortality reduction would improve the precision of cost-effectiveness estimates.
Authors: Alexander T Sandhu; Daniel A Ollendorf; Richard H Chapman; Steven D Pearson; Paul A Heidenreich Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-04-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: John J V McMurray; Scott D Solomon; Silvio E Inzucchi; Lars Køber; Mikhail N Kosiborod; Felipe A Martinez; Piotr Ponikowski; Marc S Sabatine; Inder S Anand; Jan Bělohlávek; Michael Böhm; Chern-En Chiang; Vijay K Chopra; Rudolf A de Boer; Akshay S Desai; Mirta Diez; Jaroslaw Drozdz; Andrej Dukát; Junbo Ge; Jonathan G Howlett; Tzvetana Katova; Masafumi Kitakaze; Charlotta E A Ljungman; Béla Merkely; Jose C Nicolau; Eileen O'Meara; Mark C Petrie; Pham N Vinh; Morten Schou; Sergey Tereshchenko; Subodh Verma; Claes Held; David L DeMets; Kieran F Docherty; Pardeep S Jhund; Olof Bengtsson; Mikaela Sjöstrand; Anna-Maria Langkilde Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anita A Kelkar; John Spertus; Peter Pang; Renee F Pierson; Robert J Cody; Ileana L Pina; Adrian Hernandez; Javed Butler Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Bruce Neal; Vlado Perkovic; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Dick de Zeeuw; Greg Fulcher; Ngozi Erondu; Wayne Shaw; Gordon Law; Mehul Desai; David R Matthews Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Linda D Sharples; Matthew Dyer; Fay Cafferty; Nikolaos Demiris; Carol Freeman; Nicholas R Banner; Stephen R Large; Steven Tsui; Noreen Caine; Martin Buxton Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Feby Savira; Bing H Wang; Andrew R Kompa; Zanfina Ademi; Alice J Owen; Sophia Zoungas; Andrew Tonkin; Danny Liew; Ella Zomer Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 7.804
Authors: Merrill Thomas; Philip G Jones; David J Cohen; Arnold V Suzanne; Elizabeth A Magnuson; Kaijun Wang; Vinod H Thourani; Gregg C Fonarow; Alexander T Sandhu; John A Spertus Journal: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Date: 2021-07-21
Authors: Paul A Heidenreich; Gregg C Fonarow; Yekaterina Opsha; Alexander T Sandhu; Nancy K Sweitzer; Haider J Warraich Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 6.592
Authors: Marc Evans; Angharad R Morgan; Stephen C Bain; Sarah Davies; Umesh Dashora; Smeeta Sinha; Samuel Seidu; Dipesh C Patel; Hannah Beba; W David Strain Journal: Diabetes Ther Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 3.595
Authors: Daniela Tomasoni; Gregg C Fonarow; Marianna Adamo; Stefan D Anker; Javed Butler; Andrew J S Coats; Gerasimos Filippatos; Stephen J Greene; Theresa A McDonagh; Piotr Ponikowski; Giuseppe Rosano; Petar Seferovic; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Adriaan A Voors; Marco Metra Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2022-01-17 Impact factor: 17.349
Authors: Audrey Huili Lim; Nusaibah Abdul Rahim; Jinxin Zhao; S Y Amy Cheung; Yu-Wei Lin Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2022-09-05 Impact factor: 5.988