Literature DB >> 23103012

Significance of postoperative acute renal failure after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.

Jamil Borgi1, Athanasios Tsiouris, Arielle Hodari, Chad M Cogan, Gaetano Paone, Jeffrey A Morgan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deteriorating renal function is common in patients with advanced heart failure and is associated with poor outcomes. The relationship between renal function and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is complex and has been explored in multiple studies with contradictory results. The aim of our study is to examine the significance of postoperative renal failure after implantation of a continuous-flow LVAD and its relationship to outcomes.
METHODS: From March 2006 to July 2011, 100 patients underwent implantation of a HeartMate II (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA) or HeartWare (Heart International, Inc, Framingham, MA) LVAD at our institution. Patients were stratified based on postoperative development of acute renal failure (ARF). Variables were compared using 2-sided t tests, χ(2) tests, Cox proportional hazards models, and log-rank tests to determine whether there was a difference between the 2 groups and whether postoperative renal failure was a significant independent predictor of outcome.
RESULTS: We identified 28 patients (28%) with postoperative ARF and 72 patients (72%) without postoperative ARF. The 2 groups were similar with regard to demographics and comorbidities. The patients with ARF were more likely to be intubated preoperatively (14.3% versus 1.4%; p = 0.021) and had higher preoperative central venous pressure (CVP) (14.3 mm Hg versus 10.7 mm Hg; p = 0.015). Postoperatively patients with ARF had a longer hospital stay (32.4 versus 18.7; p = 0.05), were more likely to experience right ventricular (RV) failure (25% versus 5.6%; p = 0.01) and ventilator-dependent respiratory failure (VDRF) (28.6% versus 6.9%; p = 0.007). There was a significant difference when comparing the ARF and non-ARF groups for 30-day (17.9% versus 0%; p < 0.001), 180-day (28.6% versus 2.8%; p < 0.001), and 360-day mortality (28.6% versus 6.9%; p = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients in whom ARF developed after LVAD implantation had a higher rate of VDRF and RV failure and a longer length of stay (LOS). Postoperative ARF was associated with higher mortality at the 30-day, 180-day, and 360-day intervals. ARF after LVAD may be an early marker of poor outcome, particularly RV failure, and may be an opportunity for early intervention and rescue.
Copyright © 2013 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23103012     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.08.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  20 in total

1.  Short and long term outcomes of 200 patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Athanasios Tsiouris; Gaetano Paone; Hassan W Nemeh; Jamil Borgi; Celeste T Williams; David E Lanfear; Jeffrey A Morgan
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-26

Review 2.  Renal dysfunction and chronic mechanical circulatory support: from patient selection to long-term management and prognosis.

Authors:  Meredith A Brisco; Jeffrey M Testani; Jennifer L Cook
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 3.  Kidney dysfunction and left ventricular assist device support: a comprehensive perioperative review.

Authors:  Samuel T Coffin; Dia R Waguespack; Nicholas A Haglund; Simon Maltais; Jamie P Dwyer; Mary E Keebler
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.041

4.  Medical management of patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Adam D Devore; Robert J Mentz; Chetan B Patel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-02

Review 5.  Physiological impact of continuous flow on end-organ function: clinical implications in the current era of left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Arvind Bhimaraj; Cesar Uribe; Erick E Suarez
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

6.  Hemodynamic Predictors of Renal Function After Pediatric Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Chiu-Yu Chen; Maria E Montez-Rath; Lindsay J May; Katsuhide Maeda; Seth A Hollander; David N Rosenthal; Catherine D Krawczeski; Scott M Sutherland
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 7.  Mechanical Circulatory Support: Primer for Consultant Specialists.

Authors:  Christopher W Tam; Liang Shen; Amanda Dijanic Zeidman; Ankur Srivastava; Natalia S Ivascu
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 10.614

8.  Acute kidney injury and mortality following ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Abhijit Naik; Shahab A Akhter; Savitri Fedson; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Jonathan D Rich; Jay L Koyner
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 3.754

9.  Acute kidney injury after implantation of a left ventricular assist device: a comparison of axial-flow (HeartMate II) and centrifugal-flow (HeartWare HVAD) devices.

Authors:  Azeen Anjum; Chitaru Kurihara; Andre Critsinelis; Masashi Kawabori; Tadahisa Sugiura; Andrew B Civitello; Whitson B Etheridge; Reynolds M Delgado; Leo Simpson; Joggy K George; Ajith P Nair; O H Frazier; Jeffrey A Morgan
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 10.  Left Ventricular Assist Devices and the Kidney.

Authors:  Daniel W Ross; Gerin R Stevens; Rimda Wanchoo; David T Majure; Sandeep Jauhar; Harold A Fernandez; Massini Merzkani; Kenar D Jhaveri
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.