Literature DB >> 25485563

Lessons learned from 150 continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a single institutional 7 year experience.

Athanasios Tsiouris1, Gaetano Paone, Hassan W Nemeh, Robert J Brewer, Jamil Borgi, Arielle Hodari, Jeffrey A Morgan.   

Abstract

Continuous-flow (CF) left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have become the standard of care for patients with advanced heart failure refractory to optimal medical therapy. The goal of this study was to review our 7 year single institutional experience with CF LVADs. Mean age was 50.4 + 12.5 (17-69) years for bridge-to-transplantation (BTT) patients and 57.6 + 10.4 (31-81) years for destination therapy (DT) patients (p < 0.001). Overall, 38 patients (26%) were female and 58 (41%) were African American. Etiology of heart failure was ischemic in 54 patients (37%) and nonischemic in 93 patients (63%). Overall survival at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and 2 years was 93%, 89%, 84%, and 81%, respectively. Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) was the most common complication (24%), followed by stroke (18%), right ventricular (RV) failure (18%), ventilator-dependent respiratory failure (10%), reoperation for bleeding (10%), and driveline infection (9%). These data demonstrate excellent survival with low mortality for both BTT and DT patients on long-term LVAD support. However, for LVAD therapy to become the gold standard for long-term treatment of end-stage heart failure and a plausible alternative to heart transplantation, we need to continue to improve the incidence of frequent postoperative complications, such as RV failure, driveline infections, strokes, and GIB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25485563     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  6 in total

1.  Short and long term outcomes of 200 patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Athanasios Tsiouris; Gaetano Paone; Hassan W Nemeh; Jamil Borgi; Celeste T Williams; David E Lanfear; Jeffrey A Morgan
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-26

2.  Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Omar M Abu Saleh; John M Stulak; Mark P Wilhelm; Larry M Baddour; M Rizwan Sohail
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 3.  Stroke and Intracranial Hemorrhage in HeartMate II and HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sung M Cho; Nader Moazami; Jennifer A Frontera
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 4.  The Importance of the Management of Infectious Complications for Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Michinari Hieda; Makoto Sata; Takeshi Nakatani
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-26

5.  Heartmate 3 fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device for the treatment of advanced heart failure -1 year results from the Ce mark trial.

Authors:  Thomas Krabatsch; Ivan Netuka; Jan D Schmitto; Daniel Zimpfer; Jens Garbade; Vivek Rao; Michiel Morshuis; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Silvana Marasco; Laura Damme; Yuriy Pya
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Design and rationale of haemodynamic guidance with CardioMEMS in patients with a left ventricular assist device: the HEMO-VAD pilot study.

Authors:  Jesse F Veenis; Olivier C Manintveld; Alina A Constantinescu; Kadir Caliskan; Ozcan Birim; Jos A Bekkers; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Corstiaan A den Uil; Eric Boersma; Mattie J Lenzen; Felix Zijlstra; William T Abraham; Philip B Adamson; Jasper J Brugts
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-01-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.