Literature DB >> 25034795

Factors determining post-operative readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Athanasios Tsiouris1, Gaetano Paone2, Hassan W Nemeh2, Robert J Brewer2, Jeffrey A Morgan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the current era of extensive healthcare reform, there has been a heightened focus on the frequency and cause for readmissions within 30 days of discharge given that readmissions are not reimbursed by most providers. The aim of our study was to determine the frequency, etiology and patterns of 30-day readmissions among recipients of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) at our institution as well to determine whether there were any significant predictors of readmission.
METHODS: From March 2006 through June 2013, 150 patients underwent implantation of a continuous-flow LVAD at our institution. Patients were stratified into two groups based on their 30-day readmission status. A total of 12 patients died before discharge and were excluded from our analysis. Causes for 30-day readmissions and duration of hospital stay for the readmissions were recorded. Numerous pre-operative variables and post-operative complications were compared using 2-sided t-tests and chi-square tests between patients who were and were not readmitted within 30 days of their discharge after their LVAD implant.
RESULTS: The 30-day readmission rate was 26.1% (36 of 138), with approximately 70% of post-operative readmissions occurring within 10 days of the patient's initial hospital discharge. Recurrent heart failure (12 of 36, 33.3%) and gastrointestinal bleeding (8 of 36, 22.2%) were the most common causes for 30-day readmission. The median length of stay (LOS) for readmission was 11.7 days. Thirty-day readmission did not affect short- or long-term survival. On univariate analysis, post-operative gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) was a significant risk factor for 30-day readmissions (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.99, p = 0.05), and overall length of stay was a significant factor in reducing 30-day readmission rates (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.99, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience indicates that 30-day readmission rates after LVAD implantation remain relatively high, with most occurring within 10 days of discharge. Recurrent heart failure and GIB were the most common causes of post-operative rehospitalization. In addition, GIB during the index hospitalization was a significant predictor of 30-day readmission.
Copyright © 2014 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  30-day re-admission; LVAD; left ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25034795     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  15 in total

1.  Short and long term outcomes of 200 patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Athanasios Tsiouris; Gaetano Paone; Hassan W Nemeh; Jamil Borgi; Celeste T Williams; David E Lanfear; Jeffrey A Morgan
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-26

2.  Center Variation in Medicare Spending for Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant Hospitalizations.

Authors:  Michael P Thompson; Francis D Pagani; Qixing Liang; Lynze R Franko; Min Zhang; Jeffrey S McCullough; Raymond J Strobel; Keith D Aaronson; Robert L Kormos; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  National Landscape of Unplanned 30-Day Readmissions in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Shanti Patel; Priti Poojary; Sumeet Pawar; Aparna Saha; Achint Patel; Kinsuk Chauhan; Ashish Correa; Pratik Mondal; Kanika Mahajan; Lili Chan; Rocco Ferrandino; Dhruv Mehta; Shiv Kumar Agarwal; Narender Annapureddy; Jignesh Patel; Paul Saunders; Gregory Crooke; Jacob Shani; Tariq Ahmad; Nihar Desai; Girish N Nadkarni; Vijay Shetty
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Global Outcome in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Timothy J Fendler; Michael E Nassif; Kevin F Kennedy; Susan M Joseph; Scott C Silvestry; Gregory A Ewald; Shane J LaRue; Justin M Vader; John A Spertus; Suzanne V Arnold
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Gone With the Vane.

Authors:  Emily R Legan; Renhao Li
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 8.311

6.  Long-term use of left ventricular assist devices: a report on clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Sneha Raju; Jane MacIver; Farid Foroutan; Carolina Alba; Filio Billia; Vivek Rao
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Performance Improvement to Decrease Readmission Rates for Patients With a Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Jackeline Iseler; John Fox; Kelly Wierenga
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 1.187

Review 8.  Acquired von Willebrand syndrome associated with left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Angelo Nascimbene; Sriram Neelamegham; O H Frazier; Joel L Moake; Jing-Fei Dong
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Effect of concomitant mitral valve procedures for severe mitral regurgitation during left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Masashi Kawabori; Chitaru Kurihara; Ryan T Conyer; Andre C Critsinelis; Tadahisa Sugiura; Todd Rosengart; Jeffrey A Morgan
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 1.731

10.  Gastrointestinal angiodysplasia is associated with significant gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with continuous left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Justin Cochrane; Christian Jackson; Greg Schlepp; Richard Strong
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.