Susanne Schnell1, Can Wu, Sameer A Ansari. 1. aDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois bDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois cDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University dDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate the feasibility of 4-dimensional (4D) flow MRI for the clinical assessment of cerebral and extracerebral vascular hemodynamics in patients with neurovascular disease. RECENT FINDINGS: 4D flow MRI has been applied in multiple studies to qualitatively and quantitatively study intracranial aneurysm blood flow for potential risk stratification and to assess treatment efficacy of various neurovascular lesions, including intraaneurysmal and parent artery blood flow after flow diverter stent placement and staged embolizations of arteriovenous malformations and vein of Galen aneurysmal malformations. Recently, the technique has been utilized to characterize age-related changes of normal cerebral hemodynamics in healthy individuals over a broad age range. SUMMARY: 4D flow MRI is a useful tool for the noninvasive, volumetric and quantitative hemodynamic assessment of neurovascular disease without the need for gadolinium contrast agents. Further improvements are warranted to overcome technical limitations before broader clinical implementation. Current developments, such as advanced acceleration techniques (parallel imaging and compressed sensing) for faster data acquisition, dual or multiple velocity encoding strategies for more accurate arterial and venous flow quantification, ultrahigh-field strengths to achieve higher spatial resolution and streamlined postprocessing workflow for more efficient and standardized flow analysis, are promising advancements in 4D flow MRI.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate the feasibility of 4-dimensional (4D) flow MRI for the clinical assessment of cerebral and extracerebral vascular hemodynamics in patients with neurovascular disease. RECENT FINDINGS: 4D flow MRI has been applied in multiple studies to qualitatively and quantitatively study intracranial aneurysm blood flow for potential risk stratification and to assess treatment efficacy of various neurovascular lesions, including intraaneurysmal and parent artery blood flow after flow diverter stent placement and staged embolizations of arteriovenous malformations and vein of Galen aneurysmal malformations. Recently, the technique has been utilized to characterize age-related changes of normal cerebral hemodynamics in healthy individuals over a broad age range. SUMMARY: 4D flow MRI is a useful tool for the noninvasive, volumetric and quantitative hemodynamic assessment of neurovascular disease without the need for gadolinium contrast agents. Further improvements are warranted to overcome technical limitations before broader clinical implementation. Current developments, such as advanced acceleration techniques (parallel imaging and compressed sensing) for faster data acquisition, dual or multiple velocity encoding strategies for more accurate arterial and venous flow quantification, ultrahigh-field strengths to achieve higher spatial resolution and streamlined postprocessing workflow for more efficient and standardized flow analysis, are promising advancements in 4D flow MRI.
Authors: Viton Vitanis; Robert Manka; Daniel Giese; Henrik Pedersen; Sven Plein; Peter Boesiger; Sebastian Kozerke Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Susanne Schnell; Sameer A Ansari; Parmede Vakil; Marie Wasielewski; Maria L Carr; Michael C Hurley; Bernard R Bendok; Hunt Batjer; Timothy J Carroll; James Carr; Michael Markl Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: W Chang; Y Wu; K Johnson; M Loecher; O Wieben; M Edjlali; C Oppenheim; P Roca; J Hald; B Aagaard-Kienitz; D Niemann; C Mistretta; P Turski Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Felix G Meinel; Judith Fischer; Andreas Pomschar; Natalie Wöhrle; Inga K Koerte; Denise Steffinger; Rüdiger P Laubender; Alexander Muacevic; Maximilian F Reiser; Noam Alperin; Birgit Ertl-Wagner Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Leonardo A Rivera-Rivera; Patrick Turski; Kevin M Johnson; Carson Hoffman; Sara E Berman; Phillip Kilgas; Howard A Rowley; Cynthia M Carlsson; Sterling C Johnson; Oliver Wieben Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: L M Gottwald; J Töger; K Markenroth Bloch; E S Peper; B F Coolen; G J Strijkers; P van Ooij; A J Nederveen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Sergey Sindeev; Philipp Georg Arnold; Sergey Frolov; Sascha Prothmann; Dieter Liepsch; Andrea Balasso; Philipp Berg; Stephan Kaczmarz; Jan Stefan Kirschke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: E Hwuang; P H Wu; A Rodriguez-Soto; M Langham; F W Wehrli; M Vidorreta; B Moon; K Kochar; S Parameshwaran; N Koelper; M D Tisdall; J A Detre; W Witschey; N Schwartz Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 7.299