OBJECTIVE: Head motion during 30-min (six 5-min frames) brain PET scans starting 30 min post-injection of FDG was evaluated together with the effect of post hoc motion correction between frames in J-ADNI multicenter study carried out in 24 PET centers on a total of 172 subjects consisting of 81 normal subjects, 55 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 36 mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. METHODS: Based on the magnitude of the between-frame co-registration parameters, the scans were classified into six levels (A-F) of motion degree. The effect of motion and its correction was evaluated using between-frame variation of the regional FDG uptake values on ROIs placed over cerebral cortical areas. RESULT: Although AD patients tended to present larger motion (motion level E or F in 22 % of the subjects) than MCI (3 %) and normal (4 %) subjects, unignorable motion was observed in a small number of subjects in the latter groups as well. The between-frame coefficient of variation (SD/mean) was 0.5 % in the frontal, 0.6 % in the parietal and 1.8 % in the posterior cingulate ROI for the scans of motion level 1. The respective values were 1.5, 1.4, and 3.6 % for the scans of motion level F, but reduced by the motion correction to 0.5, 0.4 and 0.8 %, respectively. The motion correction changed the ROI value for the posterior cingulate cortex by 11.6 % in the case of severest motion. CONCLUSION: Substantial head motion occurs in a fraction of subjects in a multicenter setup which includes PET centers lacking sufficient experience in imaging demented patients. A simple frame-by-frame co-registration technique that can be applied to any PET camera model is effective in correcting for motion and improving quantitative capability.
OBJECTIVE: Head motion during 30-min (six 5-min frames) brain PET scans starting 30 min post-injection of FDG was evaluated together with the effect of post hoc motion correction between frames in J-ADNI multicenter study carried out in 24 PET centers on a total of 172 subjects consisting of 81 normal subjects, 55 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 36 mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. METHODS: Based on the magnitude of the between-frame co-registration parameters, the scans were classified into six levels (A-F) of motion degree. The effect of motion and its correction was evaluated using between-frame variation of the regional FDG uptake values on ROIs placed over cerebral cortical areas. RESULT: Although ADpatients tended to present larger motion (motion level E or F in 22 % of the subjects) than MCI (3 %) and normal (4 %) subjects, unignorable motion was observed in a small number of subjects in the latter groups as well. The between-frame coefficient of variation (SD/mean) was 0.5 % in the frontal, 0.6 % in the parietal and 1.8 % in the posterior cingulate ROI for the scans of motion level 1. The respective values were 1.5, 1.4, and 3.6 % for the scans of motion level F, but reduced by the motion correction to 0.5, 0.4 and 0.8 %, respectively. The motion correction changed the ROI value for the posterior cingulate cortex by 11.6 % in the case of severest motion. CONCLUSION: Substantial head motion occurs in a fraction of subjects in a multicenter setup which includes PET centers lacking sufficient experience in imaging demented patients. A simple frame-by-frame co-registration technique that can be applied to any PET camera model is effective in correcting for motion and improving quantitative capability.
Authors: Kevin T Chen; Stephanie Salcedo; Daniel B Chonde; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Michael A Levine; Julie C Price; Bradford C Dickerson; Ciprian Catana Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: T Yamane; Y Ikari; T Nishio; K Ishii; K Ishii; T Kato; K Ito; D H S Silverman; M Senda; T Asada; H Arai; M Sugishita; T Iwatsubo Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Kevin T Chen; Stephanie Salcedo; Kuang Gong; Daniel B Chonde; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Alexander E Drzezga; Bruce Rosen; Jinyi Qi; Bradford C Dickerson; Ciprian Catana Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Kevin T Chen; Enhao Gong; Fabiola Bezerra de Carvalho Macruz; Junshen Xu; Athanasia Boumis; Mehdi Khalighi; Kathleen L Poston; Sharon J Sha; Michael D Greicius; Elizabeth Mormino; John M Pauly; Shyam Srinivas; Greg Zaharchuk Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 29.146
Authors: Elizabeth Morris; Anastasia Chalkidou; Alexander Hammers; Janet Peacock; Jennifer Summers; Stephen Keevil Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-11-28 Impact factor: 9.236