Literature DB >> 28485701

Time Order as Psychological Bias.

Laetitia Grabot1,2, Virginie van Wassenhove1,2.   

Abstract

Incorrectly perceiving the chronology of events can fundamentally alter people's understanding of the causal structure of the world. For example, when astronomers used the "eye and ear" method to locate stars, they showed systematic interindividual errors. In the current study, we showed that temporal-order perception may be considered a psychological bias that attention can modulate but not fully eradicate. According to Titchener's law of prior entry, attention prioritizes the perception of an event and thus can help compensate for possible interindividual differences in the perceived timing of an event by normalizing perception in time. In a longitudinal study, we tested the stability of participants' temporal-order perception across and within sensory modalities, together with the magnitude of the participants' prior-entry effect. All measurements showed the persistence of stable interindividual variability. Crucially, the magnitude of the prior-entry effect was insufficient to compensate for interindividual variability: Conscious time order was systematically subjective, and therefore traceable on an individual basis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; interindividual variability; multisensory; open data; temporal order; time consciousness

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28485701      PMCID: PMC5428742          DOI: 10.1177/0956797616689369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  25 in total

1.  Visual prior entry.

Authors:  D I Shore; C Spence; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-05

Review 2.  Multisensory integration: maintaining the perception of synchrony.

Authors:  Charles Spence; Sarah Squire
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Simultaneity constancy.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kopinska; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Stimulus duration influences perceived simultaneity in audiovisual temporal-order judgment.

Authors:  Lars T Boenke; Matthias Deliano; Frank W Ohl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Encoding of event timing in the phase of neural oscillations.

Authors:  Anne Kösem; Alexandre Gramfort; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The 'when' pathway of the right parietal lobe.

Authors:  Lorella Battelli; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony.

Authors:  Jean Vroomen; Mirjam Keetels; Beatrice de Gelder; Paul Bertelson
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-12

8.  Temporal order judgments activate temporal parietal junction.

Authors:  Ben Davis; John Christie; Christopher Rorden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Audiovisual temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Massimiliano Zampini; David I Shore; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Attention and the speed of information processing: posterior entry for unattended stimuli instead of prior entry for attended stimuli.

Authors:  Katharina Weiß; Frederic Hilkenmeier; Ingrid Scharlau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Stimulus duration has little effect on auditory, visual and audiovisual temporal order judgement.

Authors:  Kaisa Tiippana; Viljami R Salmela
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Self, Me and I in the repertoire of spontaneously occurring altered states of Selfhood: eight neurophenomenological case study reports.

Authors:  Andrew A Fingelkurts; Alexander A Fingelkurts; Tarja Kallio-Tamminen
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Alpha Activity Reflects the Magnitude of an Individual Bias in Human Perception.

Authors:  Laetitia Grabot; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Differences between endogenous attention to spatial locations and sensory modalities.

Authors:  J Vibell; C Klinge; M Zampini; A C Nobre; C Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Dissociating the sequential dependency of subjective temporal order from subjective simultaneity.

Authors:  Renan Schiavolin Recio; André Mascioli Cravo; Raphael Yokoingawa de Camargo; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Temporal Audiovisual Motion Prediction in 2D- vs. 3D-Environments.

Authors:  Sandra Dittrich; Tömme Noesselt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-21

7.  Robustness of individual differences in temporal interference effects.

Authors:  Nadine Schlichting; Ritske de Jong; Hedderik van Rijn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sensory experience during early sensitive periods shapes cross-modal temporal biases.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Pia Ley; Siddhart S Rajendran; Idris Shareef; Ramesh Kekunnaya; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.