Literature DB >> 28743014

Stable individual signatures in object localization.

Anna Kosovicheva1, David Whitney2.   

Abstract

Perceptual processes in human observers vary considerably across a number of domains, producing idiosyncratic biases in the appearance of ambiguous figures [1], faces [2], and a number of visual illusions [3-6]. This work has largely emphasized object and pattern recognition, which suggests that these are more likely to produce individual differences. However, the presence of substantial variation in the anatomy and physiology of the visual system [4,7,8] suggests that individual variations may be found in even more basic visual tasks. To support this idea, we demonstrate observer-specific biases in a fundamental visual task - object localization throughout the visual field. We show that localization judgments of briefly presented targets produce idiosyncratic signatures of perceptual distortions in each observer and suggest that even the most basic visual judgments, such as object location, can differ substantially between individuals.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28743014      PMCID: PMC5650099          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  10 in total

1.  Persistent states in vision break universality and time invariance.

Authors:  Mark Wexler; Marianne Duyck; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  About individual differences in vision.

Authors:  Lukasz Grzeczkowski; Aaron M Clarke; Gregory Francis; Fred W Mast; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry.

Authors:  C A Curcio; K R Sloan; O Packer; A E Hendrickson; R E Kalina
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A selective history of the study of visual motion aftereffects.

Authors:  N J Wade
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Correlated size variations in human visual cortex, lateral geniculate nucleus, and optic tract.

Authors:  T J Andrews; S D Halpern; D Purves
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Spatial heterogeneity in the perception of face and form attributes.

Authors:  Arash Afraz; Maryam Vaziri Pashkam; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  The surface area of human V1 predicts the subjective experience of object size.

Authors:  D Samuel Schwarzkopf; Chen Song; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Tilted frames of reference have similar effects on the perception of gravitational vertical and the planning of vertical saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Michael Morgan; Simon Grant; Dean Melmoth; Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Rapid eye movements to a virtual target are biased by illusory context in the Poggendorff figure.

Authors:  D Melmoth; S Grant; J A Solomon; M J Morgan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Predictive cues reduce but do not eliminate intrinsic response bias.

Authors:  Mingjia Hu; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-06-21

2.  Serial dependence in position occurs at the time of perception.

Authors:  Mauro Manassi; Alina Liberman; Anna Kosovicheva; Kathy Zhang; David Whitney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

3.  Alpha Activity Reflects the Magnitude of an Individual Bias in Human Perception.

Authors:  Laetitia Grabot; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Response Bias Reflects Individual Differences in Sensory Encoding.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-07-01

5.  Size Perception Biases Are Temporally Stable and Vary Consistently Between Visual Field Meridians.

Authors:  Dietrich S Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-09-25

6.  The test-retest reliability and spatial tuning of serial dependence in orientation perception.

Authors:  Aki Kondo; Yuki Murai; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Toward a Theory of Visual Information Acquisition in Driving.

Authors:  Benjamin Wolfe; Ben D Sawyer; Ruth Rosenholtz
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Gravitational effects of scene information in object localization.

Authors:  Anna Kosovicheva; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Spatial Heterogeneity in Bistable Figure-Ground Perception.

Authors:  Nonie J Finlayson; Victorita Neacsu; D S Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-10-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.